{Personal comment - I'm never eager to buy into conspiracy theories, but there's some evidence below by some professional organizations. That, and Putin had to be supportive of Trump's position that he might not support our NATO allies}
From DefenseOne.com: How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President - Defense One
Evidence suggests that a Russian intelligence group was the source of the most recent Wikileaks intel dump, which was aimed to influence the U.S. election.
Close your eyes and imagine that a hacking group backed by Russian President Vladimir Putin broke into the email system of a major U.S. political party. The group stole thousands of sensitive messages and then published them through an obliging third party in a way that was strategically timed to influence the United States presidential election. Now open your eyes, because that’s what just happened.
...It’s the same group that hit the State Department, the White House, and the civilian email of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The group’s modus operandi (a spearphishing attack that uploads a distinctive remote access tool on the target’s computer) is well known to cyber-security researchers.
...
Other security firms offered independent analysis and reached the same conclusion. The group Fidelis undertook their own investigation and found Crowdstrike to be correct.[/I]
I wonder if you know how much Hillary has gotten from Russia.
Yeah, THAT is a good theory, though I think that we'll play hell tryin to prove it. I think it might have been Anonymous; they've been warning about that stuff, so - just sayin... The point is though, wikileaks have shot a hole right through Clinton's bow with this crap, so already her convention is listing. At least Trump had to open his mouth first.
If Hillary let's that broad from the DNC speak tonight it's going to show people a lot more than Hillary would like.
FBI Suspects Russia Hacked DNC; U.S. Officials Say It Was to Elect Donald Trump - The Daily BeastThe FBI suspects that Russian government hackers breached the networks of the Democratic National Committee and stole emails that were posted to the anti-secrecy site WikiLeaks on Friday. It’s an operation that several U.S. officials now suspect was a deliberate attempt to influence the presidential election in favor of Donald Trump, according to five individuals familiar with the investigation of the breach.
The theory that Moscow orchestrated the leaks to help Trump, who has repeatedly praised Russian President Vladimir Putin and practically called for the end of NATO, is fast gaining currency within the Obama administration because of the timing of the leaks and Trump’s own connections to the Russian government, the sources said on condition of anonymity because the investigation is ongoing and developing quickly.
When Wikilieaks was bashing the Bush admin, it was the darling of the left, now it's the boogeyman.
Ahh so quick the boogiemen flow.
When Wikilieaks was bashing the Bush admin, it was the darling of the left, now it's the boogeyman.
Ahh so quick the boogiemen flow.
I love wikileaks so long as it provides accurate information, exposes corruption and constitutional/charter violations and other malfeasance as a reliable whistleblower and does so on an even handed, non-partisan basis.
Also I don't consider Hillary diehards and partisans to be 'left' at all.
It not a theory that it is the Russian Govt. doing the hacking . Please inform yourself.
FBI Suspects Russia Hacked DNC; U.S. Officials Say It Was to Elect Donald Trump - The Daily Beast
Why Experts Are Sure Russia Hacked the DNC Emails - NBC News
The theory that Moscow orchestrated the leaks to help Trump
That's... fine, when hillary and her supporters are to your right.. well hehe. Have fun with that.
From a more objective perspective concerned with an encompassing first world frame of reference rather than an exclusively American one, Hillary is indeed actually right wing in virtually every way save civil liberties.
The FBI "suspects"... and
Is IS a theory right now, and I am informed.
LMFAO
What fools...
Gobble gobble gobble up that looney narrative!!!!
Proof positive that the DNC is as corrupt as Hillary but it's a grand conspiracy between Putin and Trump?
:lamo
I'm glad I'll be dead in 50 years, I'd hate to see what the idiot youth of today will turn this place into...
This is why you all are called the UNTHINKING Left...
:lamo
Y'know, I really don't mind that Debbie Wasserman-Schulz is resigning - I've never trusted her anyway. It's something about her that I really, really didn't like - and it's good that she got caught.
That said, if Russia's interfering in our elections, that should be cause for concern for everyone...and WHY would they want to release e-mails which would damage the Democratic party? That last question is more important than anything else.
Assange did not hack the DNC. Putin's men did. The release was meant to aid Trump and you cannot deny it.
I like how you dismiss a theory without evidence, and then criticize the rest of us for not engaging in that act of willful ignorance.
That's just not true. The info was released in hopes of creating division in the Dems ranks and to ruin the Dems Convention. It will not work but not for lack of trying. Trump himself could not have determined a better time for the release and in fact he may have. You notice that the Russians have not hacked the RNC and that tells you who they are targeting.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/trump-putin-russia-connections
OH!!!:lamo
This is getting better and better!!
Yeah, I discount BS out of pocket...It's one of those things...
The evidence is the DNC is as corrupt as HRC.
That's the evidence.
You are showing your willful ignorance in avoiding the evidence and grasping ever so desperately, like a drowning man at CT.
No life boat is coming
Down you go.
...Pointing to the Russians and screaming foul in terms of the information provided reminds me of a story.
A few guys are walking through the woods hunting deer when suddenly an arrow falls from the sky from out of nowhere and strikes one of the hunters in the jugular vein. The guy has less than a minute to live. He looks at the other hunters hovering over him in shock and says, "Someone find the hunter who shot the arrow and ask him what kind of bow he was using."
That would be a rather ridiculous thing to say, wouldn't it? Knowing the answer, if knowing was possible, wouldn't change a damn thing about the victim's situation. In terms of the situation what idiot would ask such a question?
Y'know, I really don't mind that Debbie Wasserman-Schulz is resigning - I've never trusted her anyway. It's something about her that I really, really didn't like - and it's good that she got caught.
That said, if Russia's interfering in our elections, that should be cause for concern for everyone...and WHY would they want to release e-mails which would damage the Democratic party? That last question is more important than anything else.
Exert or sell it?What corruption ? Do you think that the DNC not allowed to exert political influence ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?