First choice would probably be Proxima Centauri, the closest star to the Solar System. Part of a triple star system called Alpha Centauri; Proxima is 4.22 light years from Earth. Alpha Centauri is actually the brightest star of the three in the system, and so the system is named after this star. Alpha Centauri is part of a closely orbiting binary about 4.37 light years from Earth.
[......]
Slowest: Ion drive propulsion, 81,000 years
Ion drive propulsion was considered to be science fiction only a few decades ago. In recent years however, the technology to support ion propulsion has moved from theory and into practice in a big way.
[......]
Fastest: Gravitational assists, 19,000 years
The Helios solar mission (Deep Space Network)
The 1976 Helios 2 mission was launched to study the interplanetary medium from 0.3AU to 1AU to the Sun. At the time, Helios 1 (launched in 1974) and Helios 2 held the record for closest approach to the Sun. However, to this day, Helios 2 holds the record for fastest ever spacecraft to travel in space.
[......]
Fastest (theoretical): Nuclear Pulse Propulsion, 85 years
Project Orion, using nuclear explosions as a propellant (NASA)
Nuclear pulse propulsion is a theoretically possible form of fast space travel. Very early on in the development of the development of the atomic bomb, nuclear pulse propulsion was proposed in 1947 and Project Orion was born in 1958 to investigate interplanetary space travel. In a nutshell, Project Orion hoped to harness the power of pulsed nuclear explosions to provide a huge thrust with very high specific impulse. It is a major advantage to extract maximum energy from a spacecraft’s fuel to minimize cost and maximize range, therefore a high specific impulse creates faster, longer-range spaceflight for minimum investment.
[......]
Actually we already have a theoretical basis for an FTL workaround... the Alcubierre drive. Not feasible as of yet, but the fact that there is a working hypothesis is encouraging that one day the problem will be solved.
Actually we already have a theoretical basis for an FTL workaround... the Alcubierre drive. Not feasible as of yet, but the fact that there is a working hypothesis is encouraging that one day the problem will be solved.
Experiments
Main article: White–Juday warp-field interferometer White
In 2012 a NASA laboratory announced that they have constructed an interferometer that they claim will detect the spacial distortions produced by the expanding and contracting spacetime of the Alcubierre metric. The work has been described in Warp Field Mechanics 101, a NASA paper by Harold Sonny White.[28][29] Alcubierre has expressed skepticism about the experiment, saying "from my understanding there is No way it can be done, probably not for Centuries If at all."[30].
In science fiction
Faster-than-light travel often appears in science fiction, where a wide variety of imaginary propulsion methods are postulated; not all of these are based on the Alcubierre drive or any other physical theory.
The Star Trek television series used the term "warp drive" to describe their method of faster than light travel. The Alcubierre theory, or anything similar, did not exist when the series was conceived, but Alcubierre stated in an email to William Shatner that his theory was directly inspired by the term used in the show,[31] and references it in his 1994 paper.[32]
That's right. All of this is only a matter of time. Even then, the nearest carbon based sentients could be a million light years away, not far by universe standards but discouraging as a time investment. More likely we'll settle some closer planets and infest the milky way with our monkey like humans.Scientists say we could make our first inter-stellar journey in 1000 years based on current GDP growth of the planet and scientific progress. There is a name for this calculation but I dont' remember it. Anyway, it says that if we leave sooner, lets say, in 900 years, chances are that the spacecraft that leaves 100 years after that will catch up to the previous space craft and also be better equipped for interstellar travel. Now chances are... interstellar travel will take decades no matter what. The whole Faster than Light or FTL.. or even close to the speed of light is hard to pull off. it's possible in quantum mechanics because you know, it's a crazy world out there. But applying quantum physics to anything bigger than atoms is tricky as far I know.
Still, go team Terra.
There is a name for this calculation but I dont' remember it. Anyway, it says that if we leave sooner, lets say, in 900 years, chances are that the spacecraft that leaves 100 years after that will catch up to the previous space craft and also be better equipped for interstellar travel.
Without a working theory of quantum gravity, any suggestion of a relation between time travel and FTL is even more speculative than FTL itself. I can see where a warp bubble need not invoke time travel or causality issues, since the bubble is still moving through our normal space-time even if the ship inside isn't.The alcubierre drive requires a form of energy that likely doesn't exist beyond quantum-scale levels (among many other problems). Much in the same way that nature doesn't allow us to produce an infinite amount of energy to accelerate beyond the speed of light, nature likely doesn't allow us to produce negative energy at the levels required. Besides, if we ever figure out how to produce negative energy there are much crazier things it would allow us to do besides FTL travel, like backwards time travel, causality violations etc.
Like it or not, we appear to live in a universe that prohibits FTL (probably to protect causality). Any interstellar travel that we do will likely be done in large, one-way relativistic generation ships, sadly.
Without a working theory of quantum gravity, any suggestion of a relation between time travel and FTL is even more speculative than FTL itself. I can see where a warp bubble need not invoke time travel or causality issues, since the bubble is still moving through our normal space-time even if the ship inside isn't.
Actually we already have a theoretical basis for an FTL workaround... the Alcubierre
drive. Not feasible as of yet, but the fact that there is a working hypothesis is encouraging that one day the problem will be solved.
It would take an infinite amount of energy to achieve a speed faster than the speed of light.
Google "Alcubierre drive". This is an entirely different matter than attempting to exceed c in the conventional sense... which is the point.
I'm pinning my hopes on neutrino's. They
have no charge positive of negative, but they are theorized to have a small (and I mean very very small) amount of mass. We currently cannot accurately detect them, but I suspect that in the future we will be able to harness their energy to both travel faster than light, and to power our homes. Just sayin you heard it here first..
Tim-
Nuetrino's ? The smallest and hardest to detect of all particles ? Nah.
How would capturing and harnessing Nuetrino's provide power or "thrust" ?
Personally I think from the ground to leaving a planets orbit we are going to be stuck with chemical propellants.
Once in space we'll use the manipulation of highly ionized particles to produce thrust with primary power coming from a fusion reactor.
This is in the future of course.
We are currently experimenting with plasma engines that eject charged particles at very high speeds after passing them through highly charged electro static fields.
On earth this doesn't amount to much if any practicle amount of thrust but in the vacuum of space a massive space ship can be propelled at great speeds for extremely long distances.
Now for warp engines it's all science fiction right now as we have yet to even test a device that allows us to bend space time, but perhaps the typical space propulsion system in the very distant future wi be a mix of all three.
Chemical propellants to break us out of the hold of planetary atmospheres, plasma engines which NASA is currently testing and then a Warp Engine to cover light years in seconds or minutes.
Oh I'm well aware of the current theories, I'm
just adding my own, "hypothesis". I think there's something to those little guys - we really have no clue about them, Neutrinos that is. There are literally trillions and trillions hitting you right now. Currently there is no known matter that interacts with it. I'm betting there really is, and we simply haven't found it.
Tim-
Actually we already have a theoretical basis for an FTL workaround... the Alcubierre drive. Not feasible as of yet, but the fact that there is a working hypothesis is encouraging that one day the problem will be solved.
It's less encouraging if you actually explore the hypothesis. Tis sort of propulsion would depend on a type of matter that we hav no evidence suggesting that it exists or can exist: matter with a negative mass. Really, it's just a result of the fact that many equations in physics still work if you plug negative numbers into them, but that doesn't mean negative mass is really a meaningful concept.
Additionally, the theoretical power requirements would be .... Well, literally astronomical.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?