I know.OK, update. It got thrown out yesterday:
Sidney Powell’s Georgia Lawsuit Gets Thrown Out In Court
Two of the attorney’s lawsuits alleging voter fraud have now been struck down.www.forbes.com
I think that's it then. Today was 'safe harbor day' and all states have certified their results.
Yes, but they say the states have no standing.
www.marketwatch.com
I'm just mentioning a lawsuit that we haven't discussed.Yes, but they say the states have no standing.
Are you really grasping at that straw now?
"How many times does The Donald want to lose?"
He's about 50-1 at this point.
Trump places hopes in longshot Texas lawsuit that asks Supreme Court to overturn election results in 4 states
Even as a legal expert calls it 'dumbest case I've ever seen filed on an emergency basis at the Supreme Court,' 17 states with Republican attorneys general..."Even conservative legal scholars, however, predicted that the lawsuit will fail. “By almost any measure, this is the legal equivalent of a Hail Mary pass,” wrote Hans von Spakovsky, a former Federal Elections Commissioner and senior legal fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation.""He called it a “press release masquerading as a lawsuit,” and argued that Texas does not have standing to sue, and even if it did it would have had to raise objections to these election changes before the election, not after. He added that the remedy Texas seeks would “disenfranchise tens of millions of voters” and that there’s “no reason to believe the voting conducted in any of the states was done unconstitutionally.”"Lisa Marshall Manheim, associate professor at the University of Washington School of Law, wrote in the Washington Post that “the litigation is legally incoherent, factually untethered, and based on theories of remedy that fundamentally misunderstand the electoral process,” predicting that it will fail."
And after so many conservatives commented negatively, you cherry pick Manheim?
I'm aware of how the lawsuit is perceived but I picked Manheim because it was the most over-the-top piece of pretentiousness.
WHy do you believe there was fraud if there is no *valid* evidence?
There have been plenty of reports about the kind of voter fraud that happens in every election. How can you not be aware that voter fraud happens all the time? https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud
And yet....not a single report has been validated (one was I guess). In Republican states, in swing states, by Republican governors, secretaries of state, and poll officials.
Where are the 'valid' claims?Do a search on "2020 voter fraud arrests".And yet....not a single report has been validated (one was I guess). In Republican states, in swing states, by Republican governors, secretaries of state, and poll officials.
I can report voter fraud from my couch
OMG, most of those are for prior elections, unsupported, and/or on ultra-conservative sites.
Come on!
www.fitsnews.com
That's a month old"Allegations of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election are the subject of a federal investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) – with the agency instructing its state offices to look into “credible” claims involving electoral irregularities.
Typically, the feds wait until elections have been formally certified to initiate such actions."
The 2020 Voter Fraud Investigation Is Officially ‘On’
Department of Justice investigating
And Barr has come out, as discussed there (in future tense), followed the process and concluded the exact opposite...he declared the election without fraud Not none...there have been some individuals, but there's no 'coordinated' effort and nothing that made any remotely significant difference. Not only that, there were cases of Republicans doing it too. There was one where some stupid far-right dudes were driving North with Trump ballots in the back of their pickup truck from somewhere down south. Small, delusional potatoes.
That's a month old
Not none...there have been some individuals, but there's no 'coordinated' effort and nothing that made any remotely significant difference. Not only that, there were cases of Republicans doing it too. There was one where some stupid far-right dudes were driving North with Trump ballots in the back of their pickup truck from somewhere down south. Small, delusional potatoes.
There has been ZERO VALID fraud found however. And the current suit from TX isnt about fraud either.
“To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election," Barr told The Associated Press. "
What are they waiting for?
www.foxnews.com
“To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election," Barr told The Associated Press. "
William Barr
And that's a month after the election and most of the investigations completed. Not only that, the few after that, brought by Rudy? Powell? All also thrown out of the courts.
The states have all certified the election. The window is closed. And what 'new' has been discovered and reported?
Barr: DOJ yet to find widespread voter fraud that could have changed 2020 election
Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday that the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, despite claims by President Trump and his campaign’s legal team.
Btw, no, you dont understand the TX suit. Has nothing to do with fraud...those voters submitted those vote legally under 'current' state law. The charge is that those changes to the law were not legal. The reasoning is that the changes were due to the epidemic and therefore, not valid. This exact thing was already thrown out by SCOTUS for PA.
That's right.“To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election," Barr told The Associated Press. "
William Barr
And that's a month after the election and most of the investigations completed. Not only that, the few after that, brought by Rudy? Powell? All also thrown out of the courts.
The states have all certified the election. The window is closed. And what 'new' has been discovered and reported?
Barr: DOJ yet to find widespread voter fraud that could have changed 2020 election
Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday that the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, despite claims by President Trump and his campaign’s legal team.
Btw, no, you dont understand the TX suit. Has nothing to do with fraud...those voters submitted those votes legally under 'current' state law. The charge is that those changes to the law were not legal. The reasoning is that the changes were due to the epidemic and therefore, not valid. This exact thing was already thrown out by SCOTUS for PA.
First, other states have no standing to interfere in those states election processes AND second, as has already been found in one dismissal, if they wanted to challenge, the challenges had to come BEFORE the election...and not ONLY in states where they didnt like the results.