• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How long until Barr is fired?

How long until Barr is fired?

  • It will be momentarily

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Within 24 hours

    Votes: 3 10.0%

  • Won't happen

    Votes: 9 30.0%

  • At some point before Trump leaves office

    Votes: 18 60.0%
  • Total voters
    30
EnigmaO01 said:
How long until Barr is fired?
Click to expand...
A few hours after the inauguration. (That should have been a choice.)

Trump won't fire him. There isn't enough time to install anyone more sycophantic than Barr.
 
Visbek said:
A few hours after the inauguration. (That should have been a choice.)

Trump won't fire him. There isn't enough time to install anyone more sycophantic than Barr.
Click to expand...

Making "firing" a poll choice after the election does't make sense.

If he leaves due to a new president in place -- isn't firing. It's just a changing of the guard.
 
Trump can always reappoint the toilet salesman.........
 
element94 said:
It sure was a WTF moment. Does he think this redeems him?
Click to expand...
It comes under the heading of "Rats Deserting the Ship". Or maybe he's decided to scuttle the ship since it's no longer sea worthy.
 
Another thread containing a leftwing circle jerk. How entertaining. NOT
 
element94 said:
So, while they say there is no evidence of fraud in the election, they are still looking into it. Nothing has really changed then, and the only thing keeping it going is Trump and his parrots still saying it without evidence. What do they expect to accomplish knowing there will be no evidence? I think it has to be drumming up support for the coup attempt. Trump still feels there is a way to remain in office, and no one will tell him otherwise. Wait'll the shooting starts, that will definitively separate those who are going to jail from those saving democracy. So far, some of the top republicans are just guilty of dereliction of duty to the country and its laws; how much more are they willing to wager? Let's see where they come down on Trump's self pardon and pardons for other's future crimes, though there doesn't seem to legal backing for either, I can still see an angry Lindsey Graham, psychotic Jim Jordan, and seriously deranged Ron Johnson fighting for him to be able to do both.
Click to expand...
I don't know about Jordan and Johnson, but Lindsey won't stick his neck out when there's a chance of it getting cut off (metaphorically, I'm not advocating violence).
 
element94 said:
So, while they say there is no evidence of fraud in the election, they are still looking into it. Nothing has really changed then, and the only thing keeping it going is Trump and his parrots still saying it without evidence. What do they expect to accomplish knowing there will be no evidence? I think it has to be drumming up support for the coup attempt. Trump still feels there is a way to remain in office, and no one will tell him otherwise. Wait'll the shooting starts, that will definitively separate those who are going to jail from those saving democracy. So far, some of the top republicans are just guilty of dereliction of duty to the country and its laws; how much more are they willing to wager? Let's see where they come down on Trump's self pardon and pardons for other's future crimes, though there doesn't seem to legal backing for either, I can still see an angry Lindsey Graham, psychotic Jim Jordan, and seriously deranged Ron Johnson fighting for him to be able to do both.
Click to expand...
Ah. Given you don't know what Barr said there was no chance that the clarification from the DOJ would make sense to you.
 
bubbabgone said:
Ah. Given you don't know what Barr said there was no chance that the clarification from the DOJ would make sense to you.
Click to expand...
But Trump says there is a mountain of evidence! Shouldn't Barr be able to find a mountain right away? Maybe the mountain is hiding behind the mountain of evidence of Biden's guilt that Durham can't find. Maybe Barr and Durham both need special mountain detectors.
 
calamity said:
I see it as a line not even Barr would cross.
Click to expand...
I had a weird thought. What if Barr said that because Trump told him to? What if It's Trump saying " Okay, It's over and done with." without having to actually say it himself?
Nah, Trumps not even that little bit honest.
 
bearpoker said:
But Trump says there is a mountain of evidence! Shouldn't Barr be able to find a mountain right away? Maybe the mountain is hiding behind the mountain of evidence of Biden's guilt that Durham can't find. Maybe Barr and Durham both need special mountain detectors.
Click to expand...
Is there any evidence of fraud?
 
bubbabgone said:
Is there any evidence of fraud?
Click to expand...
The may be isolated instances like the Republican guy who tried to get a mail-in ballot for his dead mother. Stuff like that crops up in every election. There is no evidence of systematic massive fraud covering several states that would swing an election. If there were, Rudy and company would have alleged fraud in one of their 38 and counting lawsuits before a judge in court instead of before a bunch of reporters in front of a porn shop.
 
bearpoker said:
The may be isolated instances like the Republican guy who tried to get a mail-in ballot for his dead mother. Stuff like that crops up in every election. There is no evidence of systematic massive fraud covering several states that would swing an election. If there were, Rudy and company would have alleged fraud in one of their 38 and counting lawsuits before a judge in court instead of before a bunch of reporters in front of a porn shop.
Click to expand...
That's essentially what Barr said too. There's fraud but not enough to turn the election. Unless it's massive fraud like is alleged with Dominion. He also said they're still looking.
Keep in mind, the massive fraud type is detailed in Powell's legal Claim. Have you read it?
I asked someone here that several times and they could never bring themselves to bother reading it.
I read it because I'm curious to see what she had, and it's like they didn't read it because they're petrified to see what she had.
 
bubbabgone said:
That's essentially what Barr said too. There's fraud but not enough to turn the election. Unless it's massive fraud like is alleged with Dominion. He also said they're still looking.
Keep in mind, the massive fraud type is detailed in Powell's legal Claim. Have you read it?
I asked someone here that several times and they could never bring themselves to bother reading it.
I read it because I'm curious to see what she had, and it's like they didn't read it because they're petrified to see what she had.
Click to expand...
No I haven't read it. I don't read typo laden, unprofessional garbage. If the woman can't present a paper that would pass in a 7th grade English class, why would I think it should pass in a court of law? I pity the poor law clerk who has to wade through all that. Let's see if the judge is impressed. Your chickens haven't hatched and I'm betting there's no rooster in sight.
 
bearpoker said:
No I haven't read it. I don't read typo laden, unprofessional garbage. If the woman can't present a paper that would pass in a 7th grade English class, why would I think it should pass in a court of law? I pity the poor law clerk who has to wade through all that. Let's see if the judge is impressed. Your chickens haven't hatched and I'm betting there's no rooster in sight.
Click to expand...
I managed to get through it despite the typos. You could do. It references Georgia Law and got footnotes n' ev'rything.
 
bubbabgone said:
Ah. Given you don't know what Barr said there was no chance that the clarification from the DOJ would make sense to you.
Click to expand...
I know bulls*** when I see it, and the whole election fraud thing is a massive load.
 
I think he'll resign at the end of Trump's term.
 
Carleen said:
Who cares. He would be gone in January anyway.
Click to expand...
Yeah but The Donald is a spiteful little bitch.

If he doesnt, it's because he believes he still needs Barr, which he may.
 
LouC said:
Don't think ersatz president Donny Dip Shit will do it.

Barr is slick, I think much slicker than Donny.
Click to expand...

He is. And possibly even slimier, if that's possible.
 
Lursa said:
Yeah but The Donald is a spiteful little bitch.

If he doesnt, it's because he believes he still needs Barr, which he may.
Click to expand...

That's the only reason I see for Trump keeping him around.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom