Christmas has nothing to do with Christ's actual birth...it is a secular holiday...
Hence the Coptic translation supplies interesting evidence as to how John 1:1 would have been understood back then. What do we find?
The sohidic Coptic translation uses an indefinite article with the word "god" in the final part of John 1:1. Evidently those ancient translations realized that John's words recorded at John 1:1 did not mean that jests was to be identified as Almighty God. The Word was a god, not Almighty God.
Christmas has nothing to do with Christ's actual birth...it is a secular holiday...
Psst...maybe let Christians provide the definition of Christian holidays, k?
There is barely anything about modern day Christmas that resembles its origination/intent. How it is celebrated today is a sham pushed on us by the retail industry in the pretense that it will make us feel good when truth is that Christmas is the most stressfull time of the year for far too many who feel pressured emotionally and financially into the whole gift giving tradition pushed by retailers with creative ways to help you and your money part ways. There is barely anything about Christmas in the 21st century related to early Christianity and Christ. The date was initially selected by the early church merely as a time/means to convert pagans into christians (but don't ever forget how the early christian church treated those who did not convert). I do not understand why modern day Christians refuse to accept or believe that early pagan beginnings/traditions were commonly used in the beginning of the christian church and then clung to well into our modern times.
I don't understand either... :shrug: Then again, I don't run into too many modern day Christians that would argue with you - though to be fair, I run in different denominational circles than the Christians that would go to war over this. Nah, the history is pretty clear, and the Church would hardly be the first organization to benefit from piggybacking off of another organization's branding.
Doesn't mean your description of Christmas is definitive or accurate in every case, or what is celebrated today in my church. So we don't celebrate Christ's birthday on his birthdate...who cares? Whether it was Dec 25 or Mar 25, you still have folks celebrating his birthday 2000 years later. Not too shabby.
I love Christmas. I'm sorry you don't. Hopefully you have another time of the year that you really enjoy. I promise, I won't crap all over it.
I recognize Christmas for what it has become ... and don't hate Christmas...There are things about it that I do enjoy....however, I wouldn't be upset if it went away specifically the commercialized piece of it.
Celebrating the birth of Christ 2000+ years later is pretty impressive...especially when you think about the fact that no other person - male or female has made as big an impact on mankind and religion. Regardless of one's belief or lack of....we would be hard pressed to find anyone in this world who have never heard the name Jesus, who he was, and what he represents to Christianity.
The pagan Yule is a fun festival. That's why the Christians usurped it.
And that's why here in Sweden it is still called Jul - the pagans have won, OK?
Psst...maybe let Christians provide the definition of Christian holidays, k?
It is not a Christian holiday...Christ was not even born on Dec. 25th nor did he command his followers to observe his birth...it is a pagan holiday masked as Christian...
It is not a Christian holiday...Christ was not even born on Dec. 25th nor did he command his followers to observe his birth...it is a pagan holiday masked as Christian...
It is not a Christian holiday...Christ was not even born on Dec. 25th nor did he command his followers to observe his birth...it is a pagan holiday masked as Christian...
seems more likely that he asked for the holiday then he had anything to do with a god but your right in the bible stories jesus did not call for new holidays
dont know why he would object to them though
How gratifying to be able to agree with you Elvira - an all too rare event.
Better find some new names for the days of the week, then, because they are named after Pagan gods.
I have and will always acknowledge the extremely important role Jehovah’s Witnesses have played in protecting Church-State separation
However I also think that it was out of self-preservation and not a general principle, and i am not convinced that a JW majority would allow such separation.
Not something I have power over...I do have power over whether to inculcate pagan worship/rituals into my worship to Jehovah, though...I choose not to...
“‘Therefore, get out from among them, and separate yourselves,’ says Jehovah, ‘and quit touching the unclean thing’”; “‘and I will take you in.’” 2 Corinthians 6:17
"It is in vain that they keep worshipping me, for they teach commands of men as doctrines.’ You let go of the commandment of God and cling to the tradition of men.” Mark 7:7,8
"For God’s wrath is being revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who are suppressing the truth in an unrighteous way," Romans 1:18
I was aware. And I will be a chaperone on a school trip to the museum soon.You may be interested in this...JW's have a section in the Holocaust Museum...
https://www.ushmm.org/learn/student...itnesses-victims-of-the-nazi-era/introduction
He did call it a Christian holiday...
He did call it a Christian holiday...