• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House passes resolution to move forward with Impeachment of Biden

Linuxcooldude said:
He probably shouldn't of done it in the White House.
Click to expand...
No matter. It did not meet the definition of High Crimes and Misdemeanors. An offense that any common citizen can commit is not a High Crime or misdemeanor. it is not a crime of high office. So sorry but NO!
 
jnug said:
I would not bother myself about this bit of Rightie nonsense
Click to expand...
I'm not bothered in the least, beyond pointing out the claim was a lie. And the poster knew it was a lie which is why he omitted the rest of the quote.
 
Slyfox696 said:
Why would you post this lie? That is not what Joe Biden said. And you know this, which is why you didn't post the full quote:

"This is a president who came along with the DACA program, no one had done that. Sent legislation to the desk, a pathway for the 11 million undocumented in America. This is a president that's done a great deal. I'm proud to have served with him. What I would do as president is several more things, because things have changed. I would, in fact, make sure that there is, we immediately surge to the border, all those people who are seeking asylum. They deserve to be heard. That’s who we are. We’re a nation that says, ‘If you want to flee and you’re fleeing oppression, you should come."
Click to expand...
Tantrum noted and appreciated. The toothpaste is out of the tube. Americans know that Joe Biden intentionally got people to flood the border in hopes of overwhelming our Border Patrol people.
Slyfox696 said:
So, again...why would you just blatantly post a lie like that?
Click to expand...
You don't like the truth, so you pretend that Biden's intentions were not for nefarious purposes. They were. And Americans know it. This impeachment process might run out of steam, but the awareness of Biden's incompetence will not.
 
post said:
Last night I was exposed to a re-broadcast of Hannity's earlier June 20, 2023 radio program. His guest was John Solomon,
They proceeded to misinform listeners about the performance of John Durham and the criminality of Clinton and the FBI and victimization of
Trump emphasized again in Durham's House committee testimony, yesterday.

The two looked forward to an appearance by Comer's whistleblower today, presenting evidence and testimony of Biden family criminality.

It was as if neither man was discredited and Murdoch hadn't been forced to pay an $800 million settlement.

So the brainwashing is self administered, you expose yourselves exclusively to sources that feed you shit instead of news reporting.

en.wikipedia.org

John Solomon (political commentator) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
"...Access to Trump presidential records
On June 19, 2022, Donald Trump sent a letter to the National Archives naming Solomon and Kash Patel as "representatives for access to Presidential records of my administration""

Does FBI Have Evidence That Joe Biden Received $5M Bribe from Burisma Exec?​

www.msn.com.ico
Snopes.com on MSN.com|3 hours ago
"GOP investigators and Rudy Giuliani have both claimed to know the identity of a whistleblower with information on an alleged bribe to the Bidens.
...In this article, Snopes untangles these confused claims while demonstrating that none of the claims in any way is consistent or new."
Click to expand...

Here is the scoop on the Ukraine prosecutor in question. I can't believe the GOP is STUUUUPID enough to bring this crap back from the dead:
"Shokin [the Ukraine prosecutor in question] was not investigating. He didn't want to investigate Burisma," Daria Kaleniuk, of the Ukrainian Anti-Corruption Action Center, told The Washington Post in July. "And Shokin was fired not because he wanted to do that investigation, but quite to the contrary, because he failed that investigation."

Shokin's claim to fame was NOT PROSECUTING, was talking bribes from companies NOT TO PROSECUTE THEM. US Policy supported by our allies was to try to help Ukraine get rid of him. Biden was simply executing US policy.

This above is about word for word what I posted at the time. The particular piece of GOP bullshit they are trying to peddle now is if anything more ripe today than it was then.
 
Linuxcooldude said:
We seperate families everyday. For Drunk driving, drug related, making drugs ect. Crimes in which adults do something illegal.
Click to expand...
Have you ever done anything illegal?
 
Give Republicans a power, watch them abuse it and ignore rules and morals. Censure, impeachment, counting election results, certifying results, voting to confirm appointments, on and on. And for good measure, then lie that Democrats are doing that.
 
SkyChief said:
You are absolutely right.

This impeachment has nothing to do with the (alleged) bribes that Joe Biden took for political favors - this impeachment is about his disastrous immigration/border security policies. . . . which IS substantiated by the record levels of human trafficking and the deaths related to fentanyl poisoning. These are directly linked to a dereliction of duty, to uphold the Law, and a blatant (and deliberate) failure to faithfully execute the office to which he has been entrusted.

Forget about the $5 Million bribe money. Biden is going DOWN.
Click to expand...
Has Sonny Hostin weighed in yet?
 
IQ57 said:
A legitimate impeachment?

He should have never been president. Stolen election. Illegitimate.

Democrats are fuming and projecting again.

The media and big tech are in control.
Click to expand...
^^^^ more mindless hate, projection, lies and BDS. Typical low IQ nonsense.
 
The Mark said:
So it's all about the bullshit claim of open borders?
Click to expand...

That appears to be the case this time. I'm certain there will be other articles of impeachment proposed prior to 2025.
 
Isidore said:
clerk.house.gov

Roll Call 285 Roll Call 285, Bill Number: H. Res. 529, 118th Congress, 1st Session

VOTE QUESTION: On Agreeing to the Resolution, DESCRIPTION: Relating to the resolution (H. Res. 503) impeaching Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors, VOTE TYPE: Recorded Vote, STATUS: Passed
clerk.house.gov

219 to 208
Click to expand...

I know we aren’t as common sense oriented as we use to be. Certainly not as practical as our Greatest Generation.

Hopefully we smarten up and realize our tools, especially our houses of representation, that we use to govern ourselves are not another reality tv show. It’s not for entertainment. It’s serious business and we must insist it be run like something serious.
 
Lursa said:
Exactly what are these "high crimes and misdemeanors?"
Click to expand...

It's entirely about immigration. Abuse of power and dereliction of duty.

"Using the powers of his high office, President Biden has knowingly presided over an executive branch that has continuously, overtly, and consistently violated Federal immigration law by pursuing an aggressive, open-borders agenda by purposefully and knowingly releasing more than 2,000,000 illegal aliens into the interior of the United States without the intention or ability to ensure that they appear in immigration court to face asylum or deportation proceedings."

So this hinges on proving that Biden "violated Federal immigration law" ?
Whatever.
 
The GOP should impeach Obama, make it so he was never the president. Then they can just write him out of the history books.
 
ModernDiogenes said:
I know we aren’t as common sense oriented as we use to be. Certainly not as practical as our Greatest Generation.

Hopefully we smarten up and realize our tools, especially our houses of representation, that we use to govern ourselves are not another reality tv show. It’s not for entertainment. It’s serious business and we must insist it be run like something serious.
Click to expand...

I've been wondering if they were planning on making Jerry Springer the Speaker of the House to preside over the spectacle. (I might actually watch that.)

The near instantaneous reaction afforded by the internet seems to have exacerbated a tendency towards short sightedness. Why bother doing all that work to represent the People when you can convince enough of them that you're on their side and are fighting for them?
 
ModernDiogenes said:
I know we aren’t as common sense oriented as we use to be. Certainly not as practical as our Greatest Generation.

Hopefully we smarten up and realize our tools, especially our houses of representation, that we use to govern ourselves are not another reality tv show. It’s not for entertainment. It’s serious business and we must insist it be run like something serious.
Click to expand...
C'mon ... it's the same clash of civilizations, democratic vs. less democratic.

Example #1
en.wikipedia.org

1920 United States census - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
"...Despite the constitutional requirement that House seats be reapportioned to the states respective of their population every ten years according to the census, members of Congress failed to agree on a reapportionment plan following this census, and the distribution of seats from the 1910 census remained in effect until 1933.... This census also marked a significant population shift from rural to urban. "

Example #2

Gun ownership ......2018 Gun deaths per 100,000 ....... 4 year college degrees ......incarceration per 100,000 pop.
Montana 66.3% ........................... 19.0 .......................................................... 34.8% ........................789
Wyoming 66.2% ...........................17.5 .......................................................... 29.2% ........................ 850
Alaska 64.5% ...................... ..........23.0.............................................................32,8% ....... ..................718
Idaho 60.1% ..................................14.6............................................................. 30.7% ........................ 761
West Virginia 58.5% ............17.5 ............................................... 24.1% .................... 731
Arkansas 57.2% ......................17.7 ............................................... 25.3% ................... 942
Alabama 55.5% ..................... 21.4 ............................................ 27.4% ..................... 938
Oklahoma 54.7% ................... 19.6 ........................................... 27.9% ...................... 993
Louisiana 53.1% .................... 21.2 ............................................ 26.4% .................... 1,094
Vermont 50.5% .......................11.0 ............................................ 44.4% ....................... 288
Georgia 49.2% ..................................14.9 ........................................................ 34.7% ............................. 968
New Mexico 46.2% ......................., 18.2 ......................................................... 30.1% ............................ 733
Texas 45.7% ............................ 12.1 ............................................ 33.1% ...................... 840
Florida 35.3% .................................... 12.6 ......................................................... 33.2% ............................. 795
California 28.3% ...................... 7.9 .............................................. 36.2% ...................... 549
Illinois 27.8% ......................... 11.6 ............................................... 37.1% .....,,.............. 497
Connecticut 23.6% ......................... 4.6 ........................................................... 42.1% ............................. 394
New York 19.9% ................... 4.4 ................................................. 39.9% ...................... 376
New Jersey 14.7% .....................,..... 5.5.............................................................. 43.1% ............................. 341
Massachusetts 14.7% .................. 4.4 ............................................................... 46.6% ............................. 275
 
less right said:
Five-year investigation you say? How long is that statute of limitations and why did Durham eat up five years of it?
Click to expand...
You have the wrong investigation. It is US attorney Weiss in Delaware's case which was held up for 5 years.
See #93 in an thread which discusses this.
 
eohrnberger said:
You have the wrong investigation. It is US attorney Weiss in Delaware's case which was held up for 5 years.
See #93 in an thread which discusses this.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the correction.

There are so many GOP investigations that lasted years and came up empty I sometimes confuse them.
 
This is nothing more than revenge for youknowwho's impeachments (which were justified)

What a sham
 
Credence said:
This is nothing more than revenge for youknowwho's impeachments (which were justified)

What a sham
Click to expand...

All Republicans in the House need to do is exercise the proper restrain in not mentioning the impeachments of Trump, otherwise it would have the immediate effect of revealing that this is merely revenge.

How successful do you think they'll be?
 
less right said:
Thanks for the correction.

There are so many GOP investigations that lasted years and came up empty I sometimes confuse them.
Click to expand...
No problem.
There's a lot of corruption in government that needs bright sunlight cast on it.
 
I'd say the next 10 elections are going to be a bloodbath for maga politicians. Young people and women are just not going to put up with it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom