• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

History of US tax-rates since their inception

but even renters benefit from the deduction if the landlord can take it. Means rent can be lower. rental markets are very competitive, and even $50 lower per month is a big deal.


If you think all that is saved by an owner of an apartment bldg because of mtg interest deduction is passed on to the renter, you've got another think coming.
 

You can't declare something to be cheaper simply because it is the result of subsidy or price controls. That would be like saying Venezuelans were only paying $.10 per gallon for gas. Yes, that was the price at the pump not the actual cost to society. You can't just declare something to be cheaper and have it actually cost society less.
 
WHO'S WRONG, WRONG, WRONG?


I can and I did. National Health Care in Europe is less that half the per-capita cost in the US! From the Medical Express here: Report: why health care costs are lower in Europe than US

Excerpt:


The above cost-comparison info is dated by 8-years, but in that almost-a-decade nothing whatsoever has happened to change matters - except that US-costs have increased even further than the EU!

Now you refute the above factual evidence. Do show me how wrong-wrong-wrong it is ....
 
Last edited:

No, I'm not wrong, its a government contrived price. You cannot avoid the costs by simply declaring the price. Again I will make the example of the Venezuelans buying subsidized gas for $.10 or for that matter Americans paying slightly less at the pump than they would because of subsidized corn and ethanol. It isn't actually cheaper because the government waves a magic wand. Government price controls are in no way, shape or form an accurate measure of the actual cost of something.
 
 
The chart shows that between 1952 and 1963 - America was prospering with stability and progressive steps.

From 1949-1960 there were 4 recessions and America was mired in a conflict in Korea and the start of another conflict in Vietnam. The chart shows the absolute top federal income tax rate and doesn't reflect that the AGGREGATE tax rate was far lower than today.

You want to make a compromise? 1950s taxation in exchange for 1950s spending and of course we don't need the defense budget we need then so all that can go to whatever pet welfare project you want too.

What people forget about that 90% rate is that it came with a book of exemptions where few if anybody paid it.

Social Security payroll taxes were far, far lower. My old state, NJ hadn't even THOUGHT of imposing an income tax yet.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…