From the links:
Daily Kos: That Liberal Scumbag - Barry Goldwater
The first sentence:
Written by the noted liberal "Six Degrees of Aaron" :roll:
Why Do GOP Bosses Fear Ron Paul? | The Nation
Didn't see anything that suggested a pining for Goldwater or Ike, or suggested that Nixon or bush* were moderate
No point in wasting my time by going further. I'm disappointed. I don't remember you ever posting such delusional nonsense before.
I think folks would have taken your thread much more seriously had you just said electing the nation's 45th president from the "dynasty-class" might not be such a good idea instead of attempting to make the results of the Rasmussen poll out to be something more than it was.Oh, but I think there is a sort of Love/Hate thing there...Just as with Republicans that would be in place if Jeb Bush were to throw his hat in on that side of the isle....
See, on the one hand you have a totally recognizable name for the sheeple to rally around, but to those in the know, are we not tired of this repeating cycle of ordained elites in American political life?
I know I am...The talk of Bush running, just makes me shake my head....
Look, if/when Hillary throws her hat in again, she will be the nominee, that much I know....And so does anyone else that even has a pulse. I am just saying that it would be horrible for the country.
You don't like to address the main characteristics of the trope:
1) The current iteration is a shadow of its former self
2) A return to this brand of opponent will be much appreciated
3) Remove fancy with certain figure or group when that person or group returns to power.
If you read the links, they either embrace that view, or discuss those who do.
And here I thought repub's were having trouble with splits it their party....Demo's seem to be conflicted even within their own thoughts....
I agree that educations occur as much outside a university's campus as in it. Over educated is one of two things- far more qualified for a position than it requires or far more 'stuff' was poured into too small a vessel.
Take the ACA part of your post. If you had either an education or experience in this you'd know we are already paying for 'everyone'. Those who are uninsured boost the fees both hospitals and doctors charge to recoup that loss. WE PAY THAT. People who use the ER room for simple primary health care and skip out on the bill... WE PAY THAT. You personally may not be at the moment, another sign of a lack of experience, due to parents or something, perhaps you feel young, strong and invincible and don't think you need to worry about such things.
You might be both under-educated. Reagan didn't run on 60% is good, he ran on those bad ol' liberals spending our grandchildren's futures through ever increasing social programs. (He spent their future on unfunded government programs we still have not paid for) He ran on reducing the size of government but increased it in size and number manpower. He ran on reducing taxes but quietly increased taxes and fees through his two terms in office.
So you see my young student you seem to be as defensive and forgetful of St. Ronald's two terms in office. You seem as enamored with south bite rhetoric as your fellow students...
Seems the voters who don't want Hillary are the Republican ones.
Well... she was far and away the favorite in 2008... and you folks dumped her for the first circus act you could find.
Really... what Obama had accomplished is even less than coattail sitting Hillary, and Obama had even as many or more unsavory characters around him than The Clintons had.
You folks dumped Hillary in 2008, and my bet is you'll crap upon her again. That's why I lovingly call Frau Clinton... The Sewage Plant. She has decades of experience processing raw feces.
Candidate Obama wasn't a circus act. I remember his electrifying 2004 convention speech. I generally don't watch much of either party's convention coverage because it's more pleasant to read later. (Delegates are just a little too euphoric and silly sometimes for me--crazy hats and etc.)
But I remember Obama's speech because I was so drawn in that I sat down and listened and thought to myself, "There's the new star of the Democrat Party."
And so he was. I don't want to derail the discussion into an analysis of his failures or successes. But I surely agree that he has "unsavory characters" hanging around, by which I mean the Van Jones and Zeke Emanuel and only who knows how many other scary advisors.
Anyway,Hillary was done wrong, IMO. Here is a progressive site that disagrees: OpEdNews - Article: The Myth of Hillary's Mistreatment
Candidate Obama wasn't a circus act.
You wish.
As empty as the Democratic basket has become, the fact is they represent more Americans than the Republicans do. You guys have let yourselves become the party of white men and their wives. The Dems could run Woody Harrelson and Oprah Winfrey, in any order, and the Repubs wouldn't have an answer.
Well... she was far and away the favorite in 2008... and you folks dumped her for the first circus act you could find.
Really... what Obama had accomplished is even less than coattail sitting Hillary, and Obama had even as many or more unsavory characters around him than The Clintons had.
You folks dumped Hillary in 2008, and my bet is you'll crap upon her again. That's why I lovingly call Frau Clinton... The Sewage Plant. She has decades of experience processing raw feces.
LOL and you cons didn't do the same with Romney? How conservative really was Romney? Not very at all. You have no room to talk about "dumping" a politician since YOUR side did that with every conserative that came along.
LOL and you cons didn't do the same with Romney? How conservative really was Romney? Not very at all. You have no room to talk about "dumping" a politician since YOUR side did that with every conserative that came along.
It was the ultimate show, from his drawled aout speeech in Sel-ma...to the fainting clan members and Greek Columns. It was Jimmy Swaggert goes political and the press were his apostles spreading the word. The only thing missing was the women with the beard.Candidate Obama wasn't a circus act.
Oh... he reads a pretty telepromteur.I remember his electrifying 2004 convention speech. I generally don't watch much of either party's convention coverage because it's more pleasant to read later. (Delegates are just a little too euphoric and silly sometimes for me--crazy hats and etc.)
But I remember Obama's speech because I was so drawn in that I sat down and listened and thought to myself, "There's the new star of the Democrat Party."
It's who Obama is.And so he was. I don't want to derail the discussion into an analysis of his failures or successes. But I surely agree that he has "unsavory characters" hanging around, by which I mean the Van Jones and Zeke Emanuel and only who knows how many other scary advisors.
Anyway,Hillary was done wrong, IMO. Here is a progressive site that disagrees: OpEdNews - Article: The Myth of Hillary's Mistreatment
LOL and you cons didn't do the same with Romney? How conservative really was Romney? Not very at all. You have no room to talk about "dumping" a politician since YOUR side did that with every conserative that came along.
LOL and you cons didn't do the same with Romney? How conservative really was Romney? Not very at all. You have no room to talk about "dumping" a politician since YOUR side did that with every conserative that came along.
Romney was the more mature, experienced, knowledgeable and intelligent candidate and I believe most Americans who want the best for their country, and not necessarily for their political party, would dearly love a do-over.
Romney was the more mature, experienced, knowledgeable and intelligent candidate
Only if Romney would get different advisors that understood what a cheap fraud, and outright liar their opponent, and his minions in the press were.
Hillary Clinton is the Democrat voters most want to see win her party’s presidential nomination in 2016 – and least want to see win that nomination, too.
Only if Romney would get different advisors that understood what a cheap fraud, and outright liar their opponent, and his minions in the press were.
And the only one decent, honest and forthright enough to come straight out and say he had no intention of representing 47% of the population.
And for that you voted against him and decided that Obama was your man? You certainly prioritized issues.
And the only one decent, honest and forthright enough to come straight out and say he had no intention of representing 47% of the population.
The guy wanted to be President of half the country. We really don't need that.
Excuses, excuses, excuses. So much for reasonable responsibility yet again. :coffeepap
That wasn't just for j. Just used his as a representative sample.:2wave:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?