Hillary Clinton tops list of Dems voters don't want in 2016 [W:72]

Re: Hillary Clinton tops list of Dems voters don't want in 2016

TiredOfLife said:

You can't debate a partisan hack.

Click to expand...

Not true. You're a partisan hack (i. e. an individual who think the corporate-military-industrial-establishment whore amounts to something solely because of her political party), and I'm wiping the floor with you

Still waiting for a singe noteworthy accomplishment from the aforementioned whore. . .tick tock. . .tick tock. . .

Re: Hillary Clinton tops list of Dems voters don't want in 2016

solletica said:

Not true. You're a partisan hack (i. e. an individual who think the corporate-military-industrial-establishment whore amounts to something solely because of her political party), and I'm wiping the floor with you

Still waiting for a singe noteworthy accomplishment from the aforementioned whore. . .tick tock. . .tick tock. . .

Click to expand...

The former First Lady is a whore eh? Have a nice life.

Re: Hillary Clinton tops list of Dems voters don't want in 2016

TiredOfLife said:

The former First Lady is a whore eh? Have a nice life.

Click to expand...

Don't you mean pampered life, i. e. the kind you get when you suck enough corporate **** to get to be the establishment pick?

Re: Hillary Clinton tops list of Dems voters don't want in 2016

j-mac said:

Liberal progressives really need to get over their knee jerk desire to attack sources, and people personally rather than addressing the argument, and data contained within. Don't you libs understand, it doesn't matter if I link to a news source that constantly touts conspiracy theory, and general garbage if the data used (the real argument in to debate) is independent, as in the case with the Rasmussen poll. You don't have to take the op ed journalism of the Examiner to look at the poll, and the questions asked to come to the real debate.

When that doesn't happen, and all you do is to attack the Examiner, attack the poll, attack me personally for posting it, then any rational person has to conclude that you either don't have an argument to offer over the results, or you don't like the results being discussed because they hit too close to the truth for you, and would challenge the meme put forth by talking heads on MSNBC.

Click to expand...

That is kinda original spin. When confronted with misrepresenting the data to dishonestly present a false impression, blame those who actually did read the data and presented it accurately, all the while running from the challenges posed to you. Damn knee jerk use of logic and facts to ruin your lies and spin...

Re: Hillary Clinton tops list of Dems voters don't want in 2016

solletica said:

Not true. You're a partisan hack (i. e. an individual who think the corporate-military-industrial-establishment whore amounts to something solely because of her political party), and I'm wiping the floor with you

Still waiting for a singe noteworthy accomplishment from the aforementioned whore. . .tick tock. . .tick tock. . .

Click to expand...

You mean other than being a successful lawyer, running for public office, successfully, serving as a senator, then serving as in one of the most powerful jobs in the US? Seriously, to claim Clinton does not have multiple noteworthy accomplishments and to dismiss a woman who has done more than almost any other woman in the US as a whore is the ultimate in hyperpartisan hackery.

Re: Hillary Clinton tops list of Dems voters don't want in 2016

She also led an effort that successfully reformed the Arkansas state educational system and was a board member of the Children's Defense Fund

Re: Hillary Clinton tops list of Dems voters don't want in 2016

Redress said:

That is kinda original spin. When confronted with misrepresenting the data to dishonestly present a false impression, blame those who actually did read the data and presented it accurately, all the while running from the challenges posed to you. Damn knee jerk use of logic and facts to ruin your lies and spin...

Click to expand...

Did you read the poll Red? I'll agree that the Examiner takes op ed licence to play up the question in the poll that some demo's lumped Clinton in with the others as least wanted to see run, but the poll was linked and you can clearly go in and see it for yourself....No spin, no 'lying', just read the poll and talk about it. However, your attitude, and anger at anyone whom politically disagrees with you won't allow you to do that. Instead you have to come in and do really little more than name call, insult, and deflect from the topic, to personally attack. Who the hell would want to have anything to do with you, given your vitriolic stance?

I went back and read what you so far in this thread have had to say, and for the most part it is anything but the topic, so unless you have something to say about how demo's themselves are at this point a little split in looking at the nomination, then I would civilly ask that you refrain from posting your attacks against the rules. Thanks.