- Joined
- Jun 11, 2009
- Messages
- 19,657
- Reaction score
- 8,454
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
"But let us somehow against all odds find a way to love each other as we are, and not how each of us would wish the other to be."
-Maggie Gallagher
Read more at: National Review
Former President of the National Organization for Marriage, Maggie Gallagher, said something I agree with for a once. I never thought I would live to see the day.
The rest of the article is also interesting. It lays out why some Christians may not attend a same-sex ceremony.
"But let us somehow against all odds find a way to love each other as we are, and not how each of us would wish the other to be."
-Maggie Gallagher
Read more at: National Review
Former President of the National Organization for Marriage, Maggie Gallagher, said something I agree with for a once. I never thought I would live to see the day.
The rest of the article is also interesting. It lays out why some Christians may not attend a same-sex ceremony.
"But let us somehow against all odds find a way to love each other as we are, and not how each of us would wish the other to be."
-Maggie Gallagher
Read more at: National Review
Former President of the National Organization for Marriage, Maggie Gallagher, said something I agree with for a once. I never thought I would live to see the day.
The rest of the article is also interesting. It lays out why some Christians may not attend a same-sex ceremony.
If someone said to me what she says to her "friend" in that article, the only possible response is that she should go **** herself. No one can respect part of you. No one can accept part of you and still be your friend. She doesn't "love them and keep them in her life." Half-love is not love. It's BS. If your belief is that some part of another person is broken or inferior, then you don't deserve to have them as a friend. Just because she wraps incredible disrespect in pretty words doesn't make it anything but bile.
If someone said to me what she says to her "friend" in that article, the only possible response is that she should go **** herself. No one can respect part of you. No one can accept part of you and still be your friend. She doesn't "love them and keep them in her life." Half-love is not love. It's BS. If your belief is that some part of another person is broken or inferior, then you don't deserve to have them as a friend. Just because she wraps incredible disrespect in pretty words doesn't make it anything but bile.
If someone said to me what she says to her "friend" in that article, the only possible response is that she should go **** herself. No one can respect part of you. No one can accept part of you and still be your friend. She doesn't "love them and keep them in her life." Half-love is not love. It's BS. If your belief is that some part of another person is broken or inferior, then you don't deserve to have them as a friend. Just because she wraps incredible disrespect in pretty words doesn't make it anything but bile.
If there’s somebody that I love that’s in my life, I don’t necessarily have to agree with their decisions or the decisions they’ve made to continue to love them and participate in important events
Read more at: National Review
If someone said to me what she says to her "friend" in that article, the only possible response is that she should go **** herself. No one can respect part of you. No one can accept part of you and still be your friend. She doesn't "love them and keep them in her life." Half-love is not love. It's BS. If your belief is that some part of another person is broken or inferior, then you don't deserve to have them as a friend. Just because she wraps incredible disrespect in pretty words doesn't make it anything but bile.
Her reasoning makes no sense to me at all. How does she expect to keep the gay couple in her life? If she won't attend their wedding, I'm assuming she won't go to their house either to attend their dinner parties, bbq's or whatever. And I'm pretty sure she won't invite the couple to her place either. Or meet the kids if they have or adopt any. What kind of relationship does she expect to have with these people? I really don't think she's thought this through at all.
Hi Arcana! :2wave: Long time no see.
If her religious views are like mine (and they seem similar), I would feel obligated not to participate in the ceremony, as that would be a semi-official "endorsing" of the union, which would put me in a most dubious position religiously speaking.
However, going to someone's house to visit or bbq or hang out would not be the same sort of "seeming endorsement", and wouldn't necessarily be a problem.
If it is, I guess I'm in trouble since I've been in my lesbian's friends house and went with a group including her and her S.O. to Carowinds one time...:lamo
Hiya Goshin
I guess I don't understand the difference. I mean, most likely the couple would not wed in a church seeing as most religions reject gay marriage. So it would be a secular wedding, i.e not a "real" wedding in the eyes of a religious person. Also, socialising with a married gay couple is kind of "endorsing" their union. In my view it's even more of an endorsement than merely attending the wedding ceremony.
If someone said to me what she says to her "friend" in that article, the only possible response is that she should go **** herself. No one can respect part of you. No one can accept part of you and still be your friend. She doesn't "love them and keep them in her life." Half-love is not love. It's BS. If your belief is that some part of another person is broken or inferior, then you don't deserve to have them as a friend. Just because she wraps incredible disrespect in pretty words doesn't make it anything but bile.
If someone doesn't want to be there for me on what is supposed to be one of the happiest days of my life, then what do they really want when it comes to our relationship?
Are they only there when it is convenient for them? Am I there only so they can say, "I'm not an awful person! I have gay friends!" Are we only friends because you want to "save" me?
I had a friend, a gay friend, that joined an evangelical church and wanted me there for his baptism. Now I don't agree with trying to be something I am not just to be accepted by my family. Nor do I agree with Christianity. But I will be damned if I wasn't going to be there for him when he took this next step on his journey.
A friend, a true friend, is going to be there in the front row with a big smile and wish them the best for their future.
I'm Jewish. I do not believe in the tenets of Christianity. The concept of Jesus being God is completely opposed to my views in every way. I have gone to Catholic funerals to remember my friend. I have gone to Christian weddings and services to support my friends. That's what a friend does, even if what they are doing is against their religion. I find it abhorrent that someone would put their religion over their friendships or loved ones over an issue like this.
This is how I see it too. If they say "let's do couples' night", can you truly do that without "endorsing" those decisions? Are you going to accept their children, if they adopt, use a surrogate, have children otherwise, without judgment? How can you truly do that without accepting their marriage, their relationship?
And it is bull what she says about "condemning a loved one to go against God". That is an excuse. There is no other way to put it. You can change all the words she said, replacing them with interracial or interfaith couples, and would people not be against such a view? And I notice she doesn't mention that she treats others she views as sinful and committing their life against God in that way. I don't see how she could even attend a wedding of another faith either or of those who cannot have children with each other.
This is trying to treat someone like a child or at least condescendingly. It is saying "you are wrong in how you live your life and I can't do certain things with you because of that, but I'll still be your friend, I'll still love you". It is insulting. And it makes people in real life feel very small and rejected.
Someone is choosing their religion over their love/caring for someone. I cannot in any way support or celebrate that. We are not talking about someone murdering someone or something like that. If you cannot look past your religion to support your friend's celebration, you do not deserve to have that person in your life. This is not only about SSM, but it's about anything similar that one's "morals" are against... marrying outside one's religion, marrying interracially, and a whole host of other things. By attending that wedding, the individual is NOT endorsing SSM. They are endorsing THEIR LOVE FOR THEIR FRIEND. If they cannot see that, then, if I were their friend, our friendship would end.
Her reasoning makes no sense to me at all. How does she expect to keep the gay couple in her life? If she won't attend their wedding, I'm assuming she won't go to their house either to attend their dinner parties, bbq's or whatever. And I'm pretty sure she won't invite the couple to her place either. Or meet the kids if they have or adopt any. What kind of relationship does she expect to have with these people? I really don't think she's thought this through at all.
It's her way of handling her problem. More power to her. I'm not sure I'd cut her off if she were my friend. I understand some people have irrational hang ups. I don't misconstrue that as hatred, just ignorance. Ignorance is forgivable.
If I invited someone to my wedding, and they didn't want to attend because they "didn't believe in SSM" then that would be the end of that friendship. That is simply, unacceptable to me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?