• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hegseth intends to rename USNS Harvey Milk

false but your denial is to be expected. TDS, T Derangement Syndome, is a MAGA affliction...but addicts often refuse to admit to their addictions.



With the benefitting result that I wrote...I'm glad you agree. With Dobbs recognizing no status or rights for the unborn, no state can charge women with murder for having an abortion, no criminal charges at all it seems 😁 And "people's" trending in voting have been for fewer restrictions. Young people are choosing to have fewer to no children more and more, they appreciated abortion as needed. Eventually, the holdouts will die out.
Our discussion, which has been going off topic long enough is about the abortion issue and how it's affected by Dobbs. If you want to discuss trends in young adults, start a thread. Trends have nothing to do with the demise of Roe V Wade. Take care.
 
So, you want to kill the baby one way or another. Got it.

There is no baby involved in an abortion. That's a delusional, self-indulgent idea...wishful thinking that only makes sense to the individuals happily anticipating a new family member. Creepy and self-righteous for strangers.

I'm all for protecting actual babies and all born persons.

Our discussion, which has been going off topic long enough is about the abortion issue and how it's affected by Dobbs. If you want to discuss trends in young adults, start a thread. Trends have nothing to do with the demise of Roe V Wade. Take care.

You can pretend all you want that you think Dobbs is some great improvement over RvW but true anti-abortites dont really believe that "murdering babies is a states' rights issue." Right? If they're babies, how can states allow their murder? ;) Dobbs gives states a green light for that and many are happy to allow that protection for women according to their needs.
 
There is no baby involved in an abortion. That's a delusional, self-indulgent idea...wishful thinking that only makes sense to the individuals happily anticipating a new family member. Creepy and self-righteous for strangers.

I'm all for protecting actual babies and all born persons.



You can pretend all you want that you think Dobbs is some great improvement over RvW but true anti-abortites dont really believe that "murdering babies is a states' rights issue." Right? If they're babies, how can states allow their murder? ;) Dobbs gives states a green light for that and many are happy to allow that protection for women according to their needs.
The bolding is not going to help you. You have already lost the point. Take care.
 
The bolding is not going to help you. You have already lost the point. Take care.

It's always cute when you declare victory when you fail. Almost as cute as your teeny font tactic.

In any case, the bold is true and anti-abortites dont want to admit it...but that's exactly what the Dobbs decision means...and yet most anti's claim to be thrilled. Here's the truth, again:

True anti-abortites dont really believe that "murdering babies is a states' rights issue." Right? If they're babies, how can states allow their murder? ;) Dobbs gives states a green light for that and many are happy to allow that protection for women according to their needs.​
 
It's always cute when you declare victory when you fail. Almost as cute as your teeny font tactic.

In any case, the bold is true and anti-abortites dont want to admit it...but that's exactly what the Dobbs decision means...and yet most anti's claim to be thrilled. Here's the truth, again:

True anti-abortites dont really believe that "murdering babies is a states' rights issue." Right? If they're babies, how can states allow their murder? ;) Dobbs gives states a green light for that and many are happy to allow that protection for women according to their needs.​
If you want to carry on this conversation, open another thread. We are off topic here, and again, the bolding is just making you appear agitated that you lost the point. Take care.
 
If you want to carry on this conversation, open another thread. We are off topic here, and again, the bolding is just making you appear agitated that you lost the point. Take care.

Just stop denying the truth...it's that simple :D You brought up RvW here, not me.

True anti-abortites dont really believe that "murdering babies is a states' rights issue." Right? If they're babies, how can states allow their murder? ;) Dobbs gives states a green light for that and many are happy to allow that protection for women according to their needs.​
 
Who the **** doesn't want a ship named after Harriet Tubman? She was a badass.

Oh, right. She was a black badass, so doesn't count and none of her achievements matter.
A racist sees race everywhere.
 
Back
Top Bottom