• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Has Fox News stopped reporting on the Hillary Clinton spy story?

Schism said:
You're interpreting Durhams words. He never said "right wing media".
Click to expand...
The RW media is the only media that reported on the Clinton "conspiracy" The mainstream recognized that there was substantially new in the filing than the " conflict of interest" issues Durham was suggesting should be reviewed by the Judge which mainstream media did report.
 
Schism said:
You're not quoting Durham. You're quoting a left-wing news outlet. It's an opinion piece.
Click to expand...
I am quoting FACTS!.

Amazing the mental gymnastics you go through to avoid facing the fact that you are being conned.
 
Callen said:
The RW media is the only media that reported on the Clinton "conspiracy" The mainstream recognized that there was substantially new in the filing than the " conflict of interest" issues Durham was suggesting should be reviewed by the Judge.
Click to expand...

That's your interpretation. You have a right to opinion. All that matters going forward are the court cases and indictments to come.

Scream and kick if you want. Durham is closing in on Clinton's inner circle, and eventually Hillary herself.
 
NolanVoyd said:
I am quoting FACTS!.

Amazing the mental gymnastics you go through to avoid facing the fact that you are being conned.
Click to expand...

You sure seem all upset over being right. However, your temper tantrums aren't going to make Durham's indictments go away, nor are they going to change who these people were working for.

The Russia Hoax is closing in on the conspirators. That you aren't supportive of uncovering crimes is very telling.
 
Schism said:
Scream and kick if you want. Durham is closing in on Clinton's inner circle, and eventually Hillary herself.
Click to expand...
We'll see about that but I am quite certain you are going to be sadly disappointed. Not to worry, I'm equally certain Fox will provide the necessary spin
 
NolanVoyd said:
America needs the right, the Republicans, to come back to the world of facts and reality.
Click to expand...
We've been there all along - you can tell because we're the ones that don't believe throwing trillions of dollars at imaginary or insignificant problems will turn the world into a land of milk and honey.
NolanVoyd said:
Put away the conspiracy theories and excuses for the most corrupt and unamerican president in American history.
Click to expand...
So you don't think 1/6 was an insurrection? That Trump worked for the Russians? That Joe Biden is sentiment? That Trump supporters are a cult?
NolanVoyd said:
Find your patriotism.
Click to expand...
My patriotism is alive and well as it has been for well over 50 years. I expressed that patriotism for 22 years by serving in the US Navy. You?
NolanVoyd said:
We will welcome you back with open arms.
Click to expand...
I don't WANT to be welcomed back by a bunch of foggy-brained fools.
 
Callen said:
We'll see about that but I am quite certain you are going to be sadly disappointed. Not to worry, I'm equally certain Fox will provide the necessary spin
Click to expand...

We're one year away from conservatives taking over both Houses of Congress. I assure you, this will be on the agenda.
 
Cardinal said:
So cut and paste the very substantive and meaningful thing he said in his filing here, only one catch: you can't do it using Fox's narrative.

And obviously you're not going to take up this challenge, because you know you can't.
Click to expand...
Nice try; I stopped responding to grade-school level taunts in grade school.
 
Bullseye said:
Nice try; I stopped responding to grade-school level taunts in grade school.
Click to expand...
Lol.

He asked you to quote facts

You call the request "a grade school level taunt".

Amazing!

That says it all.
 
Schism said:
You sure seem all upset over being right. However, your temper tantrums aren't going to make Durham's indictments go away, nor are they going to change who these people were working for.

The Russia Hoax is closing in on the conspirators. That you aren't supportive of uncovering crimes is very telling.
Click to expand...
Oh my God. Now you are lying.

There is no anger in my posts. No temper tantrum.

You are lying.

I think we are done here.
 
Schism said:
We're one year away from conservatives taking over both Houses of Congress. I assure you, this will be on the agenda.
Click to expand...
On that we can agree. It will be relentless unless of course the Durham report is a total bomb.
 
Bullseye said:
Nice try; I stopped responding to grade-school level taunts in grade school.
Click to expand...
Nope. I just knew that the basis for Fox's story can't be found in Durhams filing, so of course I knew that you couldn't cite the relevant text from the filing here.
 
NolanVoyd said:
Lol.

He asked you to quote facts

You call the request "a grade school level taunt".

Amazing!

That says it all.
Click to expand...
Live with the sorrow. You and I both know IF Durham words could prove your thesis you'd be filling the thread with them. So go find them instead of doing a piss-poor imitation of a elementary school tough guy. Ain't gonna work.
 
Cardinal said:
Nope. I just knew that the basis for Fox's story can't be found in Durhams filing, so of course I knew that you couldn't cite the relevant text from the filing here.
Click to expand...
You gotta get over your Fox obsession. :rolleyes: And pay attention. I said early on that Durham's problem was some RW media exaggerating his document; at this point that's true.
 
Bullseye said:
Live with the sorrow. You and I both know IF Durham words could prove your thesis you'd be filling the thread with them. So go find them instead of doing a piss-poor imitation of a elementary school tough guy. Ain't gonna work.
Click to expand...
See post 117.
 
Schism said:
You're not quoting Durham. You're quoting a left-wing news outlet. It's an opinion piece.
Click to expand...
I am quoting undeniable facts.

FACT:

The acknowledgment in Thursday's filing came as former President Donald Trump and the right-wing media falsely claim that an earlier filing from Durham definitively proves that the Hillary Clinton campaign "illegally spied" on Trump in 2016 and 2017.

FACT:

It did not allege that anyone associated with the Clinton campaign illegally spied on Trump or his White House.

Fact:

Fox and other right wing media lied about it to manipulate you.
 
Bullseye said:
You gotta get over your Fox obsession. :rolleyes: And pay attention. I said early on that Durham's problem was some RW media exaggerating his document; at this point that's true.
Click to expand...
Not exaggeration. Fabrication.
 
Mycroft said:
Fox has let the story rest for two reasons...just not the reasons you mentioned.

They don't care about any threatened lawsuit by Hillary. She'll never go there. And the news they've presented is absolutely the truth.

No...the reasons are these: 1) The story ran its course...for the time being. There's nothing new to report until Durham takes more action. 2) They are letting the Trump hating media propaganda machine take a break from twisting themselves into un-credible pretzels trying to "explain away" the importance of what Durham has done recently.

Besides, there are other sources that are talking about Durham. Here's one that explains the situation in a nutshell: https://www.larouchepac.com/durham_...urham&utm_medium=email&utm_source=larouchepac

btw, I've consistently maintained my opinion that Durham won't be going after the "national security state".
Click to expand...
Why am I nor surprised that you present a LaRouche site as a source, dear Mycroft? But didn't the Epoch Times or OAN cover this?

For those who have forgotten...

www.nytimes.com

Lyndon LaRouche, Cult Figure Who Ran for President 8 Times, Dies at 96 (Published 2019)

A quixotic leader who began his political career on the far left and ended it on the far right, railing against a host of groups.
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com
 
NolanVoyd said:
I am quoting undeniable facts.

FACT:

The acknowledgment in Thursday's filing came as former President Donald Trump and the right-wing media falsely claim that an earlier filing from Durham definitively proves that the Hillary Clinton campaign "illegally spied" on Trump in 2016 and 2017.

FACT:

It did not allege that anyone associated with the Clinton campaign illegally spied on Trump or his White House.

Fact:

Fox and other right wing media lied about it to manipulate you.
Click to expand...

Again, you claimed Durham "said" when in fact it was a left wing media opinion.

The walls are closing in on Hillary. Kick and scream all you want.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom