• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hannity vs OWS

Μολὼν λαβέ;1060461076 said:
I wonder what he meant by this statement at the end of his MSNBC interview?

“I’m looking at far, far more radical alternatives than political alternatives.”
Harrison Schultz, Co-Organizer at Occupy Wall Street

Any good journalist would've asked him what he meant....
 
Any good journalist would've asked him what he meant....

You know what he meant...far left wild stuff...look the OWs are the opposite of the Teaparty...both far right and far left fringes of everything...theres alot of people that try and "ASSOCIATE" as being OW and Teaparty and supporting them on forums...but in the end they are not...purists in their beliefs..
American will reject the OWS"s wild escapades...just like the rejected the teaparty....this always happens this isnt new
 
It just upsets you that a FAIR and BALANCE Independent like myself can make a fair and clear observation on how uncivilized and flawed Liberalism has become.

No, he's upset because the majority of your posts have revealed you to be a partisan hack with no interest in actually debating issues, and instead insult people that you disagree with while simultaneously claiming that you are "fair and balanced". You are fair and balanced in the same way that FOX News is. Give me a break.
 
They refuse to believe anyone who says anything radical, evil or stupid has any part of leadership in OWS.

Because the OWS leadership espouses their culture, philosophy, and fundamental values. :ssst:
 
You know what he meant...far left wild stuff...look the OWs are the opposite of the Teaparty...both far right and far left fringes of everything...theres alot of people that try and "ASSOCIATE" as being OW and Teaparty and supporting them on forums...but in the end they are not...purists in their beliefs..
American will reject the OWS"s wild escapades...just like the rejected the teaparty....this always happens this isnt new

Oh, I know exactly what he meant. He wants to abolish capitalism just like all the other leaders do.
 
I'm not much of a Hannity fan but when he's right, he's right.



More proof of how pathetic OWSers are.


You forgot to include the phrase "as a fair and balanced independent, I agree with this" in your OP :roll:
 
Μολὼν λαβέ;1060461090 said:
Because the OWS leadership espouses their culture, philosophy, and fundamental values. :ssst:

No no no..I disagree...Im not defending them one bit...but there really isnt any leadership....just like the teaparty has no leadership...they have spokesman...and people that wrangle into position to speak for them but espouse their personsonal beliefs.

The ows is a mass of writhing humans mindless with all differenent thoughts running through their head....the entire protest group is riddled with street people and addicts..hookers and street criminals and homeless...WHO ARE attracted to ALL mass groupings in major cities....there is money to be made.
 
Oh, I know exactly what he meant. He wants to abolish capitalism just like all the other leaders do.

Josie that clown couldnt abolish his soiled shorts...lol...these guys get on these interviews run their yappers know nothing and are meaningless in the end..
The media will grab anyone in drag them in the studio to represent anything if they think someone will watch it....the guys a tard thats all
 
Josie that clown couldnt abolish his soiled shorts...lol...these guys get on these interviews run their yappers know nothing and are meaningless in the end..
The media will grab anyone in drag them in the studio to represent anything if they think someone will watch it....the guys a tard thats all


Well, it's not just him wanting that....
 
They refuse to believe anyone who says anything radical, evil or stupid has any part of leadership in OWS.

They're an organization and a movement, until someone makes them look bad, and then they become an entirely disconnected group of individuals, where no person reflects the movement.

All the "good" stuff = OWS.

All the bad stuff = an individual acting on his own.

So it has been since the beginning.
 
The more I read about Harrison Shultz, the more amused I am by his naivete. I mean, 29's a little old to not understand where the money supporting him comes from. Saying that it's "complicated" really isn't good enough. Claiming that the NY Times stated that the NYPD sent rapists to the park to discredit AWS is a wee problem too. Not, to use Shultz's term, "cool" at all.
 
Josie that clown couldnt abolish his soiled shorts...lol...these guys get on these interviews run their yappers know nothing and are meaningless in the end..
The media will grab anyone in drag them in the studio to represent anything if they think someone will watch it....the guys a tard thats all


So since the Tea Party folks, IYO, have no spokesperson. Who is the spokesperson for the OWS?
 
You forgot to include the phrase "as a fair and balanced independent, I agree with this" in your OP :roll:

Well if it makes you feel better...... I'm not much of a Hannity fan and I don't always agree with him but as a FAIR and BALANCED independent, I agree with him on this one because when he's right, he's right.
 
Μολὼν λαβέ;1060461059 said:
The imbecile, as you put it, is the co-organizer of Occupy Wall Street. He speaks for the masses and minions who blindly follow his radical agenda.

View attachment 67126968

If you think that's true, you don't understand it at all.
 
What we have here in this OWS person is a prime example of a useful idiot.



So, when's the last time that you went out and hit the street to try and make a change in this country?
 
So, when's the last time that you went out and hit the street to try and make a change in this country?
Getting a job, paying taxes and voting is what most of us do to make a better country. Hitting the street for more free stuff isn't that productive.
 
Getting a job, paying taxes and voting is what most of us do to make a better country. Hitting the street for more free stuff isn't that productive.

Well, nuber one: it's not about free stuff, and you know that. Secondly, many many of those people have jobs, are professional people and know why they're out there, and the majority are made up of students. Lastly, I knew yo wre one of those who does nothing to improve his lot or those of other people, you just ride on everybody else's coat tails and call yourself an American.
 
Well, nuber one: it's not about free stuff, and you know that. Secondly, many many of those people have jobs, are professional people and know why they're out there, and the majority are made up of students. Lastly, I knew yo wre one of those who does nothing to improve his lot or those of other people, you just ride on everybody else's coat tails and call yourself an American.
Seriously?! I suppose you could be a plant to make OWS look stupid and semi-literate as well, as someone suggested about Harrison Schultz. I'm just trying to make sense of a very weird post.
 
Getting a job, paying taxes and voting is what most of us do to make a better country. Hitting the street for more free stuff isn't that productive.

You're very naive to think that.
 
Seriously?! I suppose you could be a plant to make OWS look stupid and semi-literate as well, as someone suggested about Harrison Schultz. I'm just trying to make sense of a very weird post.

Not my post.
 


OK, he's not a sophisticated debater and got suckered into an endless parade of gotcha moments, by a professionally payed troll twice his age like Sean Hannity. Hey what was all that, "Bullying is bad" stuff we all keep hearing about?

I'd probably stutter like a moron too, my public speaking skills are somewhere in the negative. You know public speaking/debating is an actual skill that requires lots of honing, it doesn't mean you're wrong, or right, or stupid. Public speaking is pure sophistry. I learned absolutely nothing from this video.

This is what I think of sophists:

looking_down_barrel1.jpg


You'll get yours.
 
Last edited:
The Occupuppies are another 1% who want to be the 1% that will rule the 99% when the government takes over Wall Street.
 
That video is proof that Hannity is a professional troll. I don't use that word lightly, never called anyone here a troll even though that word is thrown around allot.

Notice Hannity starts to get very angry and starts swearing, his words bleeped out, when he tries to get an emotional rise out of the guest but the guest keeps on smiling and keeps his cool.

Two types of trolling techniques.

1) Passive aggressive.

2) Frontal assault.

Hannity was using #2 in this example. I've also seen him use #1.
 
Last edited:
That video is proof that Hannity is a professional troll. I don't use that word lightly, never called anyone here a troll even though that word is thrown around allot.

Notice Hannity starts to get very angry and starts swearing, his words bleeped out, when he tries to get an emotional rise out of the guest but the guest keeps on smiling and keeps his cool.

Two types of trolling techniques.

1) Passive aggressive.

2) Frontal assault.

Hannity was using #2 in this example. I've also seen him use #1.

And the guy sitting across the desk from Hannity was what. An Idiot!!!!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom