• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Halo, CoD or Battlefield

Halo, CoD or Battlefield

  • Halo

    Votes: 5 21.7%
  • CoD

    Votes: 5 21.7%
  • Battlefield

    Votes: 8 34.8%
  • Other

    Votes: 5 21.7%

  • Total voters
    23
  • Poll closed .

Spriggs05

Anarcho Facist
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 14, 2012
Messages
1,429
Reaction score
854
Location
UK
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Which one? And no abuse.
 
I'm always between Halo and CoD.

Unfortunately I'm extremely disappointed in Microsoft and EA for the way Battlefield 3 was handled, I have one of those really low memory Xboxs and so even when I added another memory stick to it and cleared enough space on the hard drive I couldn't download the HD upgrade for the game because it wasn't a good enough Hard Drive... or so EA has determined.

And to be honest I found the gameplay slow and stodgy.

I have every single Halo game (minus Halo Wars) and I do love the series, slowly smashing my way through the Multiplayer.

And I do love CoD... logged alot of hours especially on MW2 and MW3, fantastic games.

Will definitely be checking out Crack Ops II when I can get my hands on a rental copy.
 
I agree with the amount of Hard Drive space required for Battlefield 3.

Overall though...I put in so much time in Battlefield...Battlefield 1942, Battlefield Vietnam was awesome. Battlefield 2. I love the series.

I've never been overly impressed with Call of Duty's online play. Too twitchy for me.
 
Which one? And no abuse.

I'm a big fan of the Call of Duty series. I played battlefield since battlefield 1942, but they haven't been able to reproduce the awesomeness of that game.

All in all, as far as shooters go, MW3 takes the cake.
 
I feel like Battlefield has always had the better maps. They are larger and you get to drive tanks.

I haven't played Halo since the 2nd one, so I really have no idea what it is like now.
 
I use a PC...not a console...so I've never experienced the problems you console-kiddies have. Too bad y'all will never experience BF3 on ultra.

I have limited experience with Halo. It's an okay game, I guess.

I've only played the first Call of Duty. I liked it. Very good graphics, good realism. The AI was top-notch.

Battlefield is my shooter game of choice, though I've strayed from the shooter genre. Dice and EA have improved the game with each entry to the series.
 
Don't play a ton of shooters. When I need a fix, I usually look to Team Fortress 2

I like Halo, but not enough to warrant buying an and xbox. I never really got into Battlefield besides Battlefield 1942, and COD got kind of old after while. I find the multiplayer to be too repetitive to keep my interest.
 
I'm a Halo fan, but since I only play the single-player campaigns (can't stand multiplayer) and that seems to be what CoD is geared toward, Halo is just the superior game for what I do.
 
Arma 2 is my favourite shooter.

My son...a big shooter fanatic...has played the hell out of BF3, but is now into Arma 2. He's been having a lot of fun with some mod that brings zombies into the battlefield.
 
My son...a big shooter fanatic...has played the hell out of BF3, but is now into Arma 2. He's been having a lot of fun with some mod that brings zombies into the battlefield.

That sound like Day Z. It is a great mod.

Arma 2 by itself is a lackluster game, the mods are what make it great.
 
That sound like Day Z. It is a great mod.

Arma 2 by itself is a lackluster game, the mods are what make it great.

Yeah...that's the one. He loves it.
 
Halo for sure, it's like the Star Wars of video games. Incredibly innovative and without it we wouldn't have online gaming like we do.
 
Halo for single player, CoD for multiplayer. Though I've logged a lot of hours recently on Halo 4's multiplayer, it's incomparable to MW3's.
 
My son...a big shooter fanatic...has played the hell out of BF3, but is now into Arma 2. He's been having a lot of fun with some mod that brings zombies into the battlefield.

DayZ.

The biggest thing to hit PCgaming since PCgaming. At least modwise.
 
DayZ.

The biggest thing to hit PCgaming since PCgaming. At least modwise.

The next big thing for my son is Far Cry 3. He had a lot of fun making maps for FC2 and wants to do the same for FC3.
 
I've always played both Halo and COD, logging equal hours into each. But lately, I've been playing the new Medal of Honor game... the multiplayer definitely deserves merit and is absolutely worth checking out.
 
Halo, by far.

Battlefield was nice, but I've kinda phased away from Call of Duty.
 
I know in two years CoD will be a niche title thanks to Respawn and Bungies Destiny but hopefully Halo keeps it up. Halo 4 is actually one of the reasons Black Ops 2 sales are down 15% over MW3.
 
Halo reigns supreme.
 
I never got Halo, just never could have fun with it, the campaign, or the multiplayer. If I had to choose out of the three, it'd be COD every day of the week.
 
Back
Top Bottom