- Joined
- May 19, 2005
- Messages
- 30,534
- Reaction score
- 10,717
- Location
- Louisiana
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
That number is false and you well know it, it was a "simple poll" that asked aspecific questions of the viewing audience(which happens to be liberal) and used a 1500 = 314M formulation. Yeah, that's scientific.:roll:85% of gun owners support background checks for all gun sales. Gifting to family is exempted in the proposed bill in Congress.
85% of gun owners support background checks for all gun sales. Gifting to family is exempted in the proposed bill in Congress.
your goal is to ban guns. So you support any incremental step that helps further that goal. The current UBGC scheme will fail Then people like you will demand that all guns have to be registered in order to actually enforce the stupid UBGC legislation
I have no intention on performing BGCs on those with whom I'm familiar, nor do I intend to do so. If the poll questions were properly framed, I would expect you'd get a different response...
No it isn't. You are lying again. I've told you a hundred times it will be at least 200 years before that happens in the US.
Got anything on-topic to contribute?
That number is false and you well know it, it was a "simple poll" that asked aspecific questions of the viewing audience(which happens to be liberal) and used a 1500 = 314M formulation. Yeah, that's scientific.:roll:
you have never even told us what the actual questions wereNot familiar with how national polls are conducted are you? Try the Google!
You mean that all the "national polls" you use are one sided because they cherry pick questions asked and the target audience? *GASP*, seriously, you've just admitted polling is useless right here.Not familiar with how national polls are conducted are you? Try the Google!
that is a funny question coming from a poster whose main responses involve parrot squawking the same silly poll over and over and who constantly refuses to answer tough questions such as how would the government enforce this new law when it has only seen fit to charge 277 people out of almost 2 million who supposedly lied on a 4473
and it cannot be enforced because I have no duty to keep a record of what I own or what I sold
You mean that all the "national polls" you use are one sided because they cherry pick questions asked and the target audience? *GASP*, seriously, you've just admitted polling is useless right here.
If you think that, than you have no worries with the new law if it passes. It won't affect your gun sales profits if they can't make you do it right?
You mean that all the "national polls" you use are one sided because they cherry pick questions asked and the target audience? *GASP*, seriously, you've just admitted polling is useless right here.
I mean, why let ethics and law get in the way when you really really want something right? :roll:far lefties think individual rights should be subject to popular opinion. They support the rule of the mediocre and substituting quality for quantity
Nope, we aren't a democracy and your polls are skewed. Not my fault you are arguing in the wrong direction.Ha! What a loony post.
YOu really do post some of the most moronic responses. I am offended anytime stupid laws are passed due to an appeal to the ignorant and the emotional
It is only the far right gun nuts that think it is a stupid proposal.
Nope, we aren't a democracy and your polls are skewed. Not my fault you are arguing in the wrong direction.
That's what Karl Rove said about the polls that predicted reelection of the President. How'd that turn out for him! :lamo
News flash, I'm not a Republican and not a fan of Karl Rove so it's not a big insult to me. Here's the deal, when your people commit perjury, and that's what this is, we will eventually have people with the stones to throw them in jail where they belong. Know why your party lost in '94? I do, it was a combination of trying to go with HillaryCare and the "assault weapons ban" which is why your boy former President Bill Clinton told them not to introduce gun control, because people like you are going to be crying after your party gets thrown out on their asses.That's what Karl Rove said about the polls that predicted reelection of the President. How'd that turn out for him! :lamo
a typical non relevant response.
I've told you if you want a relevant response, you first have to make a relevant point. You should try it sometime!
lets take a poll of people who post on the gun forums as to which of us two makes more relevant posts
what do you think the answer will be?
when I ask you about your silly law your parrot squawk response is to cite some silly poll
You still have nothing relevant to say I see!
That's what Karl Rove said about the polls that predicted reelection of the President. How'd that turn out for him! :lamo
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?