The post he quoted. You pulled the "So its OK if Goodyear allows people to attack black and LGBT workers..." right out of your ass. Hence, the strawman. Not too difficult.
Goodyear will survive any normal boycott from people choosing other brands for their car. Especially when someone buys another brand that is owned by Goodyear.
The company may feel a financial impact if the fans of motorsports push for a boycott of Goodyear tires at tracks.
The best policy is no offensive or politically charged clothing allowed at work to avoid any potential controversy.
That isn't a strawman. A strawman is when a person misrepresented 2 or more ideas as a way to create a false premise and offers an idea that offers a solution to that false premise that is not accurate to the original idea. Goodyear has chosen to be inclusive and support equal rights for minority employees.
Goodyear can do as they wish on their own property. If you don't like it you can leave because a job is not a right.
Straw Man Fallacy
"A straw man fallacy occurs when someone takes another person’s argument or point, distorts it or exaggerates it in some kind of extreme way, and then attacks the extreme distortion, as if that is really the claim the first person is making."
Maybe you need to relearn what a straw man fallacy is. What you did was about as textbook as it gets.
"A straw man fallacy occurs when someone takes another person’s argument or point, distorts it or exaggerates it in some kind of extreme way, and then attacks the extreme distortion, as if that is really the claim the first person is making."
Maybe you need to relearn what a straw man fallacy is. What you did was about as textbook as it gets.
That isn't a strawman. A strawman is when a person misrepresents 2 or more ideas as a way to create a false premise and offers an idea that offers a solution to that false premise that is not accurate to the original idea.
We should all believe that the lives of police officers matter. Why one political party chooses to fight against this is also sad.
Fundamentally, I do agree. As I stated earlier, it should be an all or nothing. If you allow BLM then you need to allow MAGA.
The person responsible for the slides is likely to be disciplined as well, but if they find who leaked this to the net, my bet is that he'd be fired.
This is what I said,
Did you read what I said,
Why do you lump BLM with MAGA? BLM was not created by a political party, it's clearly a cry for equality after years of abuse at the hands of white policemen/women. The other is a, 'me too' response by the Republican party including the president himself.
Federal agency: Supporting 'Black Lives Matter' isn't partisan or political
The angry white guys who claim black racism is a problem and claim that, "I'm a victim too" remind me of a conservative who would go to a cancer fundraiser and tell each and everyone, "THERE ARE OTHER DISEASES TOO"!
Or how about, looking up the obituaries, finding a funeral to attend and as they're lowering the casket you shout to the family of the deceased, "I HAVE FELT LOSS TOO"!...
But BLM is explicitly part of any political party.
MAG is the brand of the current administration
That's absurd. a MAGA hat endorses a political candidate. BLM calls for human rights.
imo, Goodyear got this wrong. BLM is political statement just as MAGA is. Companies can make whatever policies they want within the law. If I was one of their employees i would wear a All lives Matter hat/shirt and see if they write me up or fire me. It would be interesting to see them explain the policy in court.
And if you don't like company policies you are free to go find a job where you do, that is capitalism.
Like when Trump said he’d like football players fired or deported for kneeling? Or removing broadcasting licenses from networks that criticize him? Or sending out federal officers to snatch citizens off of streets “rendition” style?
Lots more examples, but you get the picture.
Leftists have a problem with law officers arresting lawbreakers. That does not make sense.
Just don't go to Oregon. The governor there just unilaterally enacted one of th biggest tax hikes in history under the guise that she had the power to do so because of the coronavirus. So now workers and corporations will be paying massive taxes to support careless, idle, comfortable greedy leftist democrats and the leftist democrat socialist agenda.
Gov. Brown keeps abusing emergencies to pass taxes, bad laws | The Oregon Catalyst
Two days after declaring a state of emergency over the coronavirus, Gov. Kate Brown then declared a climate emergency. Bypassing the elected Legislature, Governor Brown enacted a wide-sweeping Carbon Tax through an Executive Order (#20-24). This order directed 19 different government departments to implement portions of a failed Carbon Tax plan. Her order raises gas prices by forcing gas stations to serve a more expensive low-carbon blend which drives up gas prices for consumers. Her order raises housing costs with new regulations on fluorescent lights, computers, faucets, shower heads, washers, dryers, water heaters, steam cookers, ventilating fans, and more. Not a single vote was taken for these rules to go into effect.
And Trump has a problem recognizing and abiding Americans civil/Constitutional rights.Leftists have a problem with law officers arresting lawbreakers. That does not make sense.
Leftists have a problem with law officers arresting lawbreakers. That does not make sense.
That had ZERO to do with what I posted.
But since you want to whine about taxes, every state is going to raise theirs, Texas is now discussing the same, due to the Pandemic.
I am willing to bet you were one of the people crying about the Search warrant execution At Roger Stones house.
The jack-booted democrat swat teams swooped in on Manafort and Stone in the middle of the night while allowing Comey and Podesta to walk away untouched. That is not justice, it is perversion of justice..
Of course. Democrats must maintain the status quo. Government paid educators getting 6 figure retirement incomes and 3 times that while working. Multiple government agencies with no real purpose staffed by more well paid employs with no real responsibilities and no danger of losing their jobs or their retirement benefits. On top of that are hundreds of thousands of well paid government workers at the state and local level with quite generous retirement packages.
Why pick on government workers? Because of the income equality that exists between unionized rich government workers and the poor working stiffs who must pay higher taxes in order to keep those rich retirees flush with cash. I'm not against government workers or retirees. I am against lawmakers giving away pay and retire benefits at the expense of taxpayers who would rather they keep their giveaways at sustainable levels where the rest of the American workers are.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?