The OP?For those who want to claim that LBGT+ supporters won't call out those LBGT+ who do wrong, and for those few LBGT+ people who think they, the group as a whole, can do no wrong:
Teen Called A 'Bigot' For Refusing To Change Her Name To Make Trans Classmate More Comfortable
A teenager was called out when her trans schoolmate shamed her for not changing her name.percolately.com
This is really beyond the pale, not to mention hypocritical, and puts a bad face on the rest of the LBGT+ community. So who's the ahole here? The cis girl, or the trans guy?
This is going too far but a drag queen wearing a thong and shaking and rub in front of a 7 year old isn't?For those who want to claim that LBGT+ supporters won't call out those LBGT+ who do wrong, and for those few LBGT+ people who think they, the group as a whole, can do no wrong:
Teen Called A 'Bigot' For Refusing To Change Her Name To Make Trans Classmate More Comfortable
A teenager was called out when her trans schoolmate shamed her for not changing her name.percolately.com
This is really beyond the pale, not to mention hypocritical, and puts a bad face on the rest of the LBGT+ community. So who's the ahole here? The cis girl, or the trans guy?
Well clearly the 'a-hole' is any teen who makes someone else uncomfortable for calling themselves by their own preferred given or nickname. It did not take me more than one paragraph to figure that out. We have a teenager who feels way too entitled and is willing to engage in snarky childish low key bullying, but remember, still a teenager very likely to feel embarrassed and cringe about this behavior in about ten years. Most of us have those stories in our background.For those who want to claim that LBGT+ supporters won't call out those LBGT+ who do wrong, and for those few LBGT+ people who think they, the group as a whole, can do no wrong:
Teen Called A 'Bigot' For Refusing To Change Her Name To Make Trans Classmate More Comfortable
A teenager was called out when her trans schoolmate shamed her for not changing her name.percolately.com
This is really beyond the pale, not to mention hypocritical, and puts a bad face on the rest of the LBGT+ community. So who's the ahole here? The cis girl, or the trans guy?
Why did he want her to use a nickname instead of her legal name? That was never mentioned.For those who want to claim that LBGT+ supporters won't call out those LBGT+ who do wrong, and for those few LBGT+ people who think they, the group as a whole, can do no wrong:
Teen Called A 'Bigot' For Refusing To Change Her Name To Make Trans Classmate More Comfortable
A teenager was called out when her trans schoolmate shamed her for not changing her name.percolately.com
This is really beyond the pale, not to mention hypocritical, and puts a bad face on the rest of the LBGT+ community. So who's the ahole here? The cis girl, or the trans guy?
It was mentioned. Her name is he same as his deadname.Why did he want her to use a nickname instead of her legal name? That was never mentioned.
“I have a pretty common name, and my name is the same as what his dead name was.”
That isn't a good enough reason. Sorry. NTA.It was mentioned. Her name is he same as his deadname.
This is going too far but a drag queen wearing a thong and shaking and rub in front of a 7 year old isn't?
Where do you get this nonsense?Demanding gay people just convert their sexuality to affirm trans men that's not too far?
Demanding straight men hook up with dunes and dresses so they can feel more like a woman that's not too far?
Are you perpetually persecuted?I'd say everything I listed was far more egregious and far more personal than this.
And you have seen every single interaction between a drag queen and a child ever to occur?That doesn't happen at drag queen story hour. Ive never seen that happen in a bar.
Trans people.Where do you get this nonsense
What itWhat does this nonsense mean?>
Not by the proper pronouns or"misgendering"Are you perpetually persecuted?
The request to use a different name is not a realistic request (as in there is no expectation of "violated manners" if the request is not granted).For those who want to claim that LBGT+ supporters won't call out those LBGT+ who do wrong, and for those few LBGT+ people who think they, the group as a whole, can do no wrong:
Teen Called A 'Bigot' For Refusing To Change Her Name To Make Trans Classmate More Comfortable
A teenager was called out when her trans schoolmate shamed her for not changing her name.percolately.com
This is really beyond the pale, not to mention hypocritical, and puts a bad face on the rest of the LBGT+ community. So who's the ahole here? The cis girl, or the trans guy?
Glad you could comment on the actual topic.This is going too far ...
First, start a new thread on the new topic. Stop trying to derail every thread that looks to not go your way (i.e. attacking the LGBTQ).... but a drag queen wearing a thong and shaking and rub in front of a 7 year old isn't?
This is the logical extension of the pronoun wars. Why not make the trans person comfortable by going by a nickname? It's such a small thing, and if the transperson is literally cringing and cowering because of the pain and discomfort he feels, then the kind and compassionate thing to do is to make this small adjustment. It's just a word, after all. It's a noun - a proper noun, not a pronoun - but if you can enforce one word usage, why not another?For those who want to claim that LBGT+ supporters won't call out those LBGT+ who do wrong, and for those few LBGT+ people who think they, the group as a whole, can do no wrong:
Teen Called A 'Bigot' For Refusing To Change Her Name To Make Trans Classmate More Comfortable
A teenager was called out when her trans schoolmate shamed her for not changing her name.percolately.com
This is really beyond the pale, not to mention hypocritical, and puts a bad face on the rest of the LBGT+ community. So who's the ahole here? The cis girl, or the trans guy?
It was mentioned - it was because it was the same name as the trans person's "dead name" and hearing it made the trans person have a reaction (cringing when the name was said).Why did he want her to use a nickname instead of her legal name? That was never mentioned.
In whose view? Most people don't think that using normal pronouns is a violation of manners either.The request to use a different name is not a realistic request (as in there is no expectation of "violated manners" if the request is not granted).
LOL, compared to what the Left wing ideologues do around here to every thread that doesn't suit their liking, his post was positively on point.Glad you could comment on the actual topic.
Now we go on to you trying to derail the topic.
First, start a new thread on the new topic. Stop trying to derail every thread that looks to not go your way (i.e. attacking the LGBTQ).
Second, with that new thread, has anybody actually said that what you IMAGINED is not going too far?
Or are you just throwing out yet another strawman poutrage complaint?
I can give multiple reasons that have nothing to do with transgenderism to explain why post #1's scenario request is unreasonable.In whose view? Most people don't think that using normal pronouns is a violation of manners either.
The ol' counter-accusation attempt to justify the misdeed response.LOL, compared to what the Left wing ideologues do around here to every thread that doesn't suit their liking, his post was positively on point.
No. It most definitively is not.This is the logical extension of the pronoun wars.
We have an ISOLATED INCIDENT which an anti-transgender person is trying to stereo-type onto the whole population of transgenderism.Seriously, though, the trans person in the example exposes the malignant narcissism, and self-absorbed navel-gazing that is endemic in that community. Me me me, accommodate me, change for me - I said X, so you must agree with X and do X.
Nobody should care if they're being called and transphobic or anti-transgender.I can give multiple reasons that have nothing to do with transgenderism to explain why post #1's scenario request is unreasonable.
Your claim of "most people" (along with the claim of "normal pronouns") is profoundly wrong. These days, there are a relatively small number of transphobes trying to make transgender issues into a wedge issue for political purposes.
The ol' counter-accusation attempt to justify the misdeed response.
Boringly predictable.
The reality is that the anti-transgender side has a boringly small number of tricks (which I have detailed in past posts) and @CLAX1911 's derailment attempt is simply a bad attempt to try to switch to one of those strawmen arguments.
No. It most definitively is not.
The baseline issue actually has nothing to do with transgender issues in the first place. A similar scenario - a boy's father dies and also has a friend whose name matches the boy's father name. Would the boy insist that other people should not use that name for his friend?
The article presents an isolated incident that most people would just move past.
We have an ISOLATED INCIDENT which an anti-transgender person is trying to stereo-type onto the whole population of transgenderism.
Who could have predicted that?
So you bothered to reply, but the only thing you wanted to address is that word?Nobody should care if they're being called and transphobic or anti-transgender.
It doesn't mean anything.
You have that backwards - today there are a relatively small number of activists who want to upend the English language, and are asking us all to cater to the demands other people have for the pronouns we use in the third person, without even addressing the person in question directlyI can give multiple reasons that have nothing to do with transgenderism to explain why post #1's scenario request is unreasonable.
Your claim of "most people" (along with the claim of "normal pronouns") is profoundly wrong. These days, there are a relatively small number of transphobes trying to make transgender issues into a wedge issue for political purposes.
There a people's father's who die all the time with names that match other people's names. Never once have I heard someone say "don't use your name John - switch it to Jack, because John was my father's name..." -- I mean, the request is absurd.The ol' counter-accusation attempt to justify the misdeed response.
Boringly predictable.
The reality is that the anti-transgender side has a boringly small number of tricks (which I have detailed in past posts) and @CLAX1911 's derailment attempt is simply a bad attempt to try to switch to one of those strawmen arguments.
No. It most definitively is not.
The baseline issue actually has nothing to do with transgender issues in the first place. A similar scenario - a boy's father dies and also has a friend whose name matches the boy's father name. Would the boy insist that other people should not use that name for his friend?
The article presents an isolated incident that most people would just move past.
This incident may be isolated, but it is emblematic of the entire transgender push these days - everything is about imposition and control. They not only want to self-identify, they want to demand that everyone else like it and "affirm it." Nobody has to agree with anyone else, even on personal issues. It's childish and stupid to think you can go through life ordering other people around by telling them what words to use.We have an ISOLATED INCIDENT which an anti-transgender person is trying to stereo-type onto the whole population of transgenderism.
Who could have predicted that?
It's high-time some of the trans folks are called what they are, misogynists. Since jack-a-lopes on the order of Dylan Mulvaney are nothing but insulting to women, mimicking what an effeminate gay male tends to think women do and act like. All the prancing and skipping, over-focus on frivolity and irrationality. If a heterosexual male did a show wherein he acted like Mulvaney and claimed that's how women act, he'd be strung up in the media for mocking women in a stereotypical fashion. These transwomen are quite often just caricatures.Nobody should care if they're being called and transphobic or anti-transgender.
It doesn't mean anything.
I always consider that those AITA posts are very likely just someone coming up with a story to cause controversy. It's difficult to tell which are telling the truth.For those who want to claim that LBGT+ supporters won't call out those LBGT+ who do wrong, and for those few LBGT+ people who think they, the group as a whole, can do no wrong:
Teen Called A 'Bigot' For Refusing To Change Her Name To Make Trans Classmate More Comfortable
A teenager was called out when her trans schoolmate shamed her for not changing her name.percolately.com
This is really beyond the pale, not to mention hypocritical, and puts a bad face on the rest of the LBGT+ community. So who's the ahole here? The cis girl, or the trans guy?
I didn't think people like mulvaney are trans they're just jumping in the trend. Some are autogynophiles/autoandrophiles. It's just the latest it was a form of rebellion. And many of them will stop when it's no longer cool anymore.It's high-time some of the trans folks are called what they are, misogynists. Since jack-a-lopes on the order of Dylan Mulvaney are nothing but insulting to women, mimicking what an effeminate gay male tends to think women do and act like. All the prancing and skipping, over-focus on frivolity and irrationality. If a heterosexual male did a show wherein he acted like Mulvaney and claimed that's how women act, he'd be strung up in the media for mocking women in a stereotypical fashion. These transwomen are quite often just caricatures.
This is profoundly not true.You have that backwards - today there are a relatively small number of activists who want to upend the English language, and are asking us all to cater to the demands other people have for the pronouns we use in the third person, without even addressing the person in question directly
Personal claims on the internet are like noses.There isn't a single person I encounter on a daily basis who wants to bother with the pronoun BS. We all grew up with you, your, he, him, she and her, and they work just fine. We are not required to refer to people as starburst/starburstself or pumpkin spice pronouns
Quick question...There a people's father's who die all the time with names that match other people's names. Never once have I heard someone say "don't use your name John - switch it to Jack, because John was my father's name..." -- I mean, the request is absurd.
This sentence is a perfect example of too many modern day transphobes.This incident may be isolated, but it is emblematic of the entire transgender push these days...
Isolated incidents demonstrate that the entire thing is this way?This incident may be isolated, but it is emblematic of the entire transgender push these days - everything is about imposition and control.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?