• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

God loves tariffs, stop your whining!

First off, Lawfare.org is not on your side. Second, that list contains tariff cases brought by businesses and a Tribe, not Democratic politicians, the context you argued within was the admin vs "Dems".

And I suppose Democrats had nothing at all to do with those tariff cases brought by businesses and a Tribe?
 
And I suppose Democrats had nothing at all to do with those tariff cases brought by businesses and a Tribe?
You can hold to any conspiracy theory you want...

iu
 
And I suppose Democrats had nothing at all to do with those tariff cases brought by businesses and a Tribe?
Democrats are pro-business, not sure why that offends you.
 
Feel free to do so.

Tarrifs intended to eliminate the trade deficit is an impossibility because of differences in national income averages; Americans simply have more money to spend so there will always be trade deficits with certain countries.

Tariffs as a tool of negotiation are undercut by the Administration not being able to actually articulate what it wants, as evident by the failure to negotiate a new deal with Japan.

Tariffs intended to rebuild manufacturing fail to recognize that; most manufacturing was lost to automation, American manufacturing needs access to cheap raw materials from foreign countries, the manufacturing base is already short 500K jobs.
 
Tarrifs intended to eliminate the trade deficit is an impossibility because of differences in national income averages; Americans simply have more money to spend so there will always be trade deficits with certain countries.

Tariffs as a tool of negotiation are undercut by the Administration not being able to actually articulate what it wants, as evident by the failure to negotiate a new deal with Japan.

Tariffs intended to rebuild manufacturing fail to recognize that; most manufacturing was lost to automation, American manufacturing needs access to cheap raw materials from foreign countries, the manufacturing base is already short 500K jobs.
All of which makes sense to me. Yet, Trump is the elected President and I'm willing to give him time to work his policies. Trump is an obnoxious man but he is not stupid.
 
All of which makes sense to me. Yet, Trump is the elected President and I'm willing to give him time to work his policies. Trump is an obnoxious man but he is not stupid.
Yes he very much is, both obnoxious and stupid. And those are just two of his very long list of shortcomings and psychopathologies.
 
All of which makes sense to me. Yet, Trump is the elected President and I'm willing to give him time to work his policies. Trump is an obnoxious man but he is not ststupid.
The only thing more stupid than the malignant narcissist scumbag piece of shit liar grifter rapist seditionist felon serial adulterer and tax cheat are his supporters.
 
Of course you can't - because that number is probably zero. In any case, it isn't likely that those churches have any government support, so no conflict of interests is at stake.
Maybe it's just a state policy, but the states that I have lived in all forbid churches or any other 501(c)3 organizations from mixing politics in their mission, especially forbidding the endorsement of political candidates. Such actions would make them subject to state taxes, such as property tax and sales tax, and make any contributions they receive income and the people contributing could not claim them as a deduction. On a federal level, that is somewhat the same. I contribute to the ACLU and other national good-government organizations but my contribution must go to their foundations and not directly to the organization. If I contributed directly , I wouldn't be able to deduct my contribution from my income for federal income taxes.
 
Yes he very much is, both obnoxious and stupid. And those are just two of his very long list of shortcomings and psychopathologies.
I'd bet dollars to donuts that he wouldn't be able to tell you, in his own words without prompting, what those EOs actually said. He just holds up those EOs after signing them like a kindergartner saying "Mommy, look at what I just did!"
 
other country tariffs have been ripping off America for decades
it has killed industries and good paying middle-class jobs
other presidents didn't have balls to do anything about it

View attachment 67566417
View attachment 67566418

You repeat a false script. If you understood tariffs you would no they can not and do not prove any kind of "rip off" and iin fact if anything simply show one thing-when the US engages in trade, it imports natural resources it does not have. That is all it shows. What it does not show and you do not understand is that:

1-the imbalance itself is not a rip off-the US takes the natural resource, refines it, then resells it making profit=all the imbalance shows is that the US is profiting from the natural resources;

2-the money the US pays for the resources then circulates in the country of the natural resources and is placed in their banks;


3-tose foreign banks then lend that money at favourable interest rates to the US so that the US can expand its businesses and make even further profit;

4-in fact there is no rip off-take for example the oil the US gets from Canada-it gets it and way below market prices, then refines it and exports it all making a huge profit-if anything Canada should have not been selling that oil as cheaply as we have to the US-if anything we were lazy not diversifying our exports of that oil to other countries which do not demand below market prices-now thanks to Trump's false narrative, we will-we will reoroute our oil, gas, potash, lumber, all products Trump claims the US does not need and is ripping off the US t- Europe, China, South Korea, Japan, South America. Asia, Australia and new Zealand with no tariffs and much fairer exchange rates-this is now causing the US to be unable to export this oil and lose hundreds of millions proving Trump is a liar-the US needs these resources as the basis to make its profit.

You repeating an article as you have shows you have zero understanding of the actual tariff system with Canada, China, and many other nations and think posting the above passes as your expertise on a complex issue.

People like you have been told that the very tariffs you posted do NOT exist. Had you done your researxch you would know that. THEY DO NOT EXIST. In fact for the tariffs you quote to apply the US would first have to export to Canada a certain level of the products you listed to trigger those tariffs. Trump's regime signed a trade agreement with Canada whereby those tariffs do NOT kick in because Canada agreed to only apply them after the US would sell a certain level which they have never reached. We reset the level to be fair to the US in these sectors.

So you produce a page that repudiates the very claim you make all because you won't research the issue!

Is it any wonder for the last 3 months Trump lies to you and you parrot it back. Just yesterday he said your egg prices went down and you probably lapped it up. Stop swallowing it and go brush your teeth.

I myself can not conceive you are this unaware of US trade and tariffs and can only subjectively conclude you are someoneone posing as American who is engaging in Russian spam.











The only countries that benefit from the script you have provided which is so transparently false are Russia and secondarily China. Even Magas are realizing the tariff war is a false script designed as a pretesense to enable a retail tax on American consumers and cause strock fluctuations for insiders to trade stocks knowing when their value will go from high to low and back up again.
 
Back
Top Bottom