- Joined
- Jul 19, 2012
- Messages
- 14,185
- Reaction score
- 8,768
- Location
- Houston
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Years ago a clinical scientist, Peter Gibson at Monash University in Australia, published a paper implying that there were lesser forms of gluten sensitivity that didn't produce full blown celiac disease but did result in a number of nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms. Since then the concept has ballooned as a means of explaining all sorts of ill-defined ailments such that at this point 18% of Americans claim to be sensitive to gluten and avoiding gluten in foods has turned into a multi-billion dollar industry.
Meanwhile, that same scientist went back and repeated his study using more subjects and better controls. He ended up deciding that there is no such thing as non-celiac gluten sensitivity, not the way he originally described it.
My prediction is that this will have absolutely no effect on the anti-gluten industry or on the people who claim to have gluten sensitivity.
Scientists who found gluten sensitivity evidence have now shown it doesn't exist - ScienceAlert
Meanwhile, that same scientist went back and repeated his study using more subjects and better controls. He ended up deciding that there is no such thing as non-celiac gluten sensitivity, not the way he originally described it.
My prediction is that this will have absolutely no effect on the anti-gluten industry or on the people who claim to have gluten sensitivity.
Scientists who found gluten sensitivity evidence have now shown it doesn't exist - ScienceAlert