- Joined
- Apr 15, 2020
- Messages
- 3,601
- Reaction score
- 749
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Least he has seed to spill ... leftist D’s shoot blanks
Ever think of how many babies you guarantee cannot exist every time you spill the seed?
Huh? Jews can't repent?
She voted for legalized abortion because she was a racist eugenicist wanting to use abortions to eliminate inferior races such as preventing 20 million black babies from being born. She openly acknowledged that was the motive of population control - not privacy - and voted for it.The left treats this woman as a revered icon. She's far from it. It's simply Marxist propaganda. The woman was a butcher, plain and simple 30 million babies killed under her watch. She supported partial birth abortion and the the suppression of religious freedom in the Hobby Lobby case. She voted to make gay marriage the law of the land. There was no justice more extreme left in the last 27 years.
I don't judge people's souls, but I would suggest unless she has repented in private, she will have or has had much to answer for.
Trump should nominate and the Senate should confirm a great conservative pro-life justice as soon as possible. I haven't done the political caculus of whether confirmation should be before or after election day. There are arguments both ways. But obviously Trump's pick, possibly Amy Coney Barrett, should be quickly approved. The hearings on Barrett should be interesting. I think we'll see how Democrats REALLY feel about women as they skewer her on everything from having so many children to her Catholic faith. We'll see how Democrats react when confronted with a TRULY devout Catholic, as opposed to the imposters in their party.
Dude when you flat out lie....people just laugh. LolShe voted for legalized abortion because she was a racist eugenicist wanting to use abortions to eliminate inferior races such as preventing 20 million black babies from being born. She openly acknowledged that was the motive of population control - not privacy - and voted for it.
Joe Biden ordered you to not accept facts - so you don't. That is what is laughable.Dude when you flat out lie....people just laugh. Lol
Trump wants to kill every minority in America because he is a white nationalist.Joe Biden ordered you to not accept facts - so you don't. That is what is laughable.
Joe Biden ordered you to not accept facts - so you don't. That is what is laughable.
You should be embarrassedJustice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s comment about eugenics
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in a New York Times Magazine interview in 2009, “Frankly I had thought that at the time (Roe vs. Wade) was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
The comment was in the context of Medicaid funding for abortion, the Chicago Tribune reported.
Eugenics is a set of beliefs and practices that aim to improve the genetic quality of a human population, historically by excluding people and groups judged inferior or promoting those judged superior.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Thought Roe v Wade Was About Eugenics: 3 Things You Need To Know
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Thought Roe v Wade Was About Eugenics: 3 Things You Need To Knowmoguldom.com
You should be embarrassed
What's False
Ginsburg did not say she personally supported Roe v. Wade because it could help limit the population growth of "undesirable" communities.
Did Ruth Bader Ginsburg Cite 'Population Growth' Concerns When Roe v. Wade Was Decided?
The Supreme Court justice's remarks in a 2009 interview have led to accusations that the Supreme Court justice was a proponent of eugenics.www.snopes.com
You got busted in a lie.She said that was the purpose and she voted for it.
Judging means holding a person's sins against him/her, even when repented of
Sounds like TDS symptom Number one
Holy crappy referencing and nonsense website to boot.Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s comment about eugenics
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in a New York Times Magazine interview in 2009, “Frankly I had thought that at the time (Roe vs. Wade) was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
The comment was in the context of Medicaid funding for abortion, the Chicago Tribune reported.
Eugenics is a set of beliefs and practices that aim to improve the genetic quality of a human population, historically by excluding people and groups judged inferior or promoting those judged superior.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Thought Roe v Wade Was About Eugenics: 3 Things You Need To Know
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Thought Roe v Wade Was About Eugenics: 3 Things You Need To Knowmoguldom.com
The left treats this woman as a revered icon. She's far from it. It's simply Marxist propaganda. The woman was a butcher, plain and simple 30 million babies killed under her watch. She supported partial birth abortion and the the suppression of religious freedom in the Hobby Lobby case. She voted to make gay marriage the law of the land. There was no justice more extreme left in the last 27 years.
I don't judge people's souls, but I would suggest unless she has repented in private, she will have or has had much to answer for.
Trump should nominate and the Senate should confirm a great conservative pro-life justice as soon as possible. I haven't done the political caculus of whether confirmation should be before or after election day. There are arguments both ways. But obviously Trump's pick, possibly Amy Coney Barrett, should be quickly approved. The hearings on Barrett should be interesting. I think we'll see how Democrats REALLY feel about women as they skewer her on everything from having so many children to her Catholic faith. We'll see how Democrats react when confronted with a TRULY devout Catholic, as opposed to the imposters in their party.
Does it include ignoring sexual abuse and actively covering it up? I'll pass, thanks.Devout Catholics know the mean of devout Catholic, and it hasn't changed. Only in the leftwing media has it changed to where a guy who opposes the most basic tenet of the RCC, Joe Biden, is referred to erroneously as a 'devout Catholic'.
You got busted in a lie.
HAHAHAHAHA
Actually I posted the evidenceYou doubled down on posting false claims. That is fun for you.
No you didn't.Actually I posted the evidence
Which you will ignore
The behavior you describe is against Catholic teaching. Thanks for backing up Catholic teaching. Now you don't have to pass.Does it include ignoring sexual abuse and actively covering it up? I'll pass, thanks.
I will let others decideNo you didn't.
If Ginsburg had her way I'd never been born. One of those undesirable races of people to the Democratic Party.I will let others decide
You can not see thru the hate you have for your childhood
If trump had his way every minority would be killedIf Ginsburg had her way I'd never been born. One of those undesirable races of people to the Democratic Party.
That quote about "eliminating undersirables" (read: 'blacks') is eerily similar to Margaret Sanger's.Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s comment about eugenics
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in a New York Times Magazine interview in 2009, “Frankly I had thought that at the time (Roe vs. Wade) was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
The comment was in the context of Medicaid funding for abortion, the Chicago Tribune reported.
Eugenics is a set of beliefs and practices that aim to improve the genetic quality of a human population, historically by excluding people and groups judged inferior or promoting those judged superior.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Thought Roe v Wade Was About Eugenics: 3 Things You Need To Know
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Thought Roe v Wade Was About Eugenics: 3 Things You Need To Knowmoguldom.com
Sanger was a pro.life nutThat quote about "eliminating undersirables" (read: 'blacks') is eerily similar to Margaret Sanger's.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?