Citation needed (of Trump actually stating that).no trump openly states he tried to overturn it.
the sky is no color at all checkmate
Exactly comrade, there are no political rivals only defenders of democracy as defined by Kim Jung Biden versus enemies of the state. It's our patriotic duty to follow the guidance of our leader to exterminate the other by any means necessary.He was not speaking about political rivals. He made that clear. He was speaking about dangerous criminals, traitors, and insurrectionists out to subvert American democracy. It's OK to speak out about dangerous seditionists and enemies of American government in a a not-so-calm manner.
Yes! That’s why it’s OK for political parties and politicians to openly break the laws and brag about it, because going after them is always political.Exactly comrade, there are no political rivals only defenders of democracy as defined by Kim Jung Biden versus enemies of the state. It's our patriotic duty to follow the guidance of our leader to exterminate the other by any means necessary.
LOL I never voted for Trump, so your TDS is hilarious.Odd the things Trumpers get upset about. A red flood lit stage ....OMG. Hundreds and hundreds of classified and Top Secret documents stored in an unsecured manner at a resort........no biggie! This speech warning about a radical subset of RW'ers is nothing but a deflection ....'cause when it's all you got ...it's all you got.
They werent' insurrectionists. They were a mob of protesters run amok. That's all they were.But, they were insurrectionists, they committed insurrection. They tried to stop a constitutional transfer of power.
Uh, you didn't watch the speech, he targeted MAGA's, they are not half anything, let alone with half a brain.
But keep on showing us how MAGA you are.
PS, anytime you want to show how I, an atheist, "worships" anything....or for matter. anyone, go ahead and post it.
You would if Trump delivered that speech with that imagery. The only reason you don't pay much attention now is that it's Biden.Idk
I don't pay much attention to mood lighting.
Should I?
Today's WSJ article hit the nail on the head describing Biden's angry speech as satirizing "Get Smart".Man. One Biden speech has the Trump ball lickers in an epic hissy fit. What's wrong? Did he hit too close to home? You guys made your bed.
Some were and their trails start soon. However, I agree most weren't. The real insurrectionists were in the WH plotting how to stay in power in contravention of the Constitution.They werent' insurrectionists. They were a mob of protesters run amok. That's all they were.
Again, that's nonsense. They were plotting how to challenge the popular vote counts and challenge the electors. That's not unusual, and it's not illegal. Every election involves challenges to various electoral votes, and the House votes on them. They have the power to invalidate electoral slates.Some were and their trails start soon. However, I agree most weren't. The real insurrectionists were in the WH plotting how to stay in power in contravention of the Constitution.
You already undercut this argument with your own realization:They werent' (sic) insurrectionists.
You recognized the the insurrectionists identified themselves as insurrectionists.Maybe the unruly mob "identified as" an insurrection.
Not after the elections are Constitutionally certified by the States. At that point it is over. There is no provision to replace them during the official count. Eastman and Trump we're advised by WH counsel that what they were doing was illegal and a grand jury is currently hearing evidence. The judge who refused Eastmans request said there was potential evidence of criminal wrong doing.Again, that's nonsense. They were plotting how to challenge the popular vote counts and challenge the electors. That's not unusual, and it's not illegal. Every election involves challenges to various electoral votes, and the House votes on them. They have the power to invalidate electoral slates.
You would be wrong about that. I have zero problem with court challenges challenging results or votes. However, when States Constitutionally certify an election and seat the electors it's over! Losers can whine all they want but it's over and interfering with the peaceful transfer of power is unacceptable....or should be.You've bought the narrative that the Democrats sold which is that 2020 was proven to be completely valid and that no rightful objection to any votes could be made, and that no fraud occurred, so anyone who said the election was stolen was a traitor and attacking Democracy. However, in 2016, the Democrats claimed the election was "stolen" by Donald Trump and he was an illegitimate President because he stole the election by colluding with the Russians. Yet, for some reason, saying that - even though the 2016 election was no more proven to be invalid than 2020 - it's fine for Democrats to say that, but not fine for Republicans to challenge 2020.
Aww did he hurt your feelings?I watched it live, buddy. You can't gaslight me. He looked angry because that was the kind of speech this was - angry, hostile, insulting, and loaded with complete ****ing bullshit. The speech was ugly. And it was meant to be ugly.
I guess your answer implies exactly why CNN would alter and "doctor" the imagery, so as to make it seem less disturbing and bizarre. Right? That is why they DOCTORED the images - to help Joe Biden not look so bizarre....
Not one MAGAt has tried to prove Biden wrong.Aww did he hurt your feelings?
Hopefully, upon self-reflection, you will see the irony of this^ post, and, for your sake, not do it again, as to save yourself further embarrassment going forward.blah blah blah blah blah - nothing of substance in your posts.
Took a page straight out of the liberal playbookcomparing him to Hitler
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?