- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 31,344
- Reaction score
- 19,883
- Location
- East Coast - USA
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
I have yet to meet a single atheist that has even the most rudimentary moral compass.
I have yet to meet a single atheist that has even the most rudimentary moral compass.
What I listed are sins. I said a person would "slip the slippery slope to the sins the society calls you to". You said it's the same for an atheist, but what sins are you referring to?
I have yet to meet a single atheist that has even the most rudimentary moral compass.
Are you lesbian? It would be nice to know where you are coming from.
I have yet to meet a single atheist that has even the most rudimentary moral compass.
I have yet to meet a single atheist that has even the most rudimentary moral compass.
Do you **** little holes in the walls of high school gymnasiums after everyone has gone home? It would be nice to know what you’re coming in.
So, I'll take Yes as your answer.
So, I'll take Yes as your answer.
A conscience is what stops me from cheating on my wife. It is anecdotal to running a functional society.
You can take my question as a question. What do you put your dick in? If who I **** is relevant, who you **** must be relevant some how.
So I’ll take it as a yes on the high school gymnasiums.
Excellent! Now that we have established that you and I **** stuff, would you like to discuss your criteria for assessing a moral compass? What do you believe makes someone moral? How do you guage?
I’ll take it that you can’t actually provide us with any further information to show that your statement about atheists has any merit at all.
I'm not following you down your rabbit hole. Are you or are you not a lesbian?
I merely gave you my observation, which you clearly could not refute, that I have never met an atheist who had a moral compass. Take it or leave it, it is still true.
And who issued you that "conscience"?
Were you just wandering around in life and "discovered" it? Hardly.
I merely gave you my observation, which you clearly could not refute, that I have never met an atheist who had a moral compass. Take it or leave it, it is still true.
I merely gave you my observation, which you clearly could not refute, that I have never met an atheist who had a moral compass. Take it or leave it, it is still true.
So, how do you explain what Paul said?
"For when people of the nations, who do not have law, do by nature the things of the law, these people, although not having law, are a law to themselves. They are the very ones who demonstrate the matter of the law to be written in their hearts, while their conscience is bearing witness with them, and by their own thoughts they are being accused or even excused." Romans 2:14,15
So, how do you explain what Paul said?
"For when people of the nations, who do not have law, do by nature the things of the law, these people, although not having law, are a law to themselves. They are the very ones who demonstrate the matter of the law to be written in their hearts, while their conscience is bearing witness with them, and by their own thoughts they are being accused or even excused." Romans 2:14,15
We're atheists. We don't care what Paul said. It does not affect our ethical values, per se.
We're atheists. We don't care what Paul said. It does not affect our ethical values, per se.
Then you don’t wish to participate in this exchange. I did not sign up as a guest on the “Smallvoice Tells Us About Things He ****s” pop up talk show.
This is a thread about morals. You’ve made a couple of declarations and thus far refuse to expand on any of them. You keep this up and you’ll leave little doubt about moral compasses *and* intellectual backbones.
You cannot state any actual instance to show that your statement is true, and so we must make the conclusion that it has no merit in reality.