- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
- Messages
- 27,199
- Reaction score
- 14,222
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Trump cannot refuse to leave. He cannot deny a loss. He does not have to agree to accept voting results. He can simply leave when he loses or be removed via force if he’s stupid enough to be do *that*.
Just as Joe cannot just stroll into the WH should he lose, President Ramp cannot jsut decide “Not fair“ and sue until he’s given what he wants. He can certainly sue. He can certainly entertain his own opinion. But once we have spoken, it doesn’t matter what he says.
Let’s try to keep this in perspective as we freak out closer to the election. There is nothing that says the SC gets to decide a damn thing where oru elections are concerned. THis is a GOP created new myth designed to define down voting. Don’t take the bait.
You are wrong.I don’t think that’s what that post was so either you grabbed the wrong FB meme or you just liked the colors here.
You are wrong.
Your entire post was predicated on your wild speculation that Trump won't leave the WH if he loses the election.
You have NOTHING to support that speculation.
You are wrong.
Your entire post was predicated on your wild speculation that Trump won't leave the WH if he loses the election.
You have NOTHING to support that speculation.
Yes, for the most part, state supreme courts are the last word on state law, and each state decides its own election process. The SCOTUS would only step in in cases where the law conflicts with federal law or the Constitution itself. States have deadlines for certifying electors, and can't treat one group of voters with greater scrutiny than another group, for example.There is nothing that says the SC gets to decide a damn thing where oru elections are concerned. THis is a GOP created new myth designed to define down voting. Don’t take the bait.
You are wrong.
Your entire post was predicated on your wild speculation that Trump won't leave the WH if he loses the election.
You have NOTHING to support that speculation.
Why should I have a position on your conspiracy theory?What will your position be if he refuses to do so? I think we all know what your response will be and what your actual position is.
Doesn't matter if you specifically stated anything at all. Your thread is based on wild speculation.Please quote where I specifically stated Trump has stated he will not leave if he loses the eleciton in that post.
If you cannot, then we’ll just agree you thought the colors were pretty. Thx.
He didn't say he won't, either.Yes there is! He refuses to say he will! Why?
Yes, for the most part, state supreme courts are the last word on state law, and each state decides its own election process. The SCOTUS would only step in in cases where the law conflicts with federal law or the Constitution itself. States have deadlines for certifying electors, and can't treat one group of voters with greater scrutiny than another group, for example.
Doesn't matter if you specifically stated anything at all. Your thread is based on wild speculation.
Why should I have a position on your conspiracy theory?
Why should I have a position on your conspiracy theory?
You are wrong.
Your entire post was predicated on your wild speculation that Trump won't leave the WH if he loses the election.
You have NOTHING to support that speculation.
I'll leave the conspiracy theories up to you and your ilk.You probably shouldn't. You know we'll rub your nose in it if the worst fears prove to be true. Obviously you think it's a possibility, otherwise you would have no problem giving your opinion. Such an easy path to the high road for you, but you're afraid to take it. That's what you get for supporting an asshole, I guess.
Please...don't cry.Your comment is based on making up stuff about the thread. Fruit of a poison tree.
So what happened to states rights?Yes, for the most part, state supreme courts are the last word on state law, and each state decides its own election process. The SCOTUS would only step in in cases where the law conflicts with federal law or the Constitution itself. States have deadlines for certifying electors, and can't treat one group of voters with greater scrutiny than another group, for example.
He didn't say he won't, either.
That means you are speculating whether he will or won't.
Please...don't cry.
It's unmanly.
I still think Trump is purposefully triggering the media and his opposition, just to react the way we are seeing this thread play out.
States don't have a right to take away constitutionally-protected rights.So what happened to states rights?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?