• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Freedom of speech 'no longer exists' in Australia and the UK: Katie Hopkins

watsup said:
Hillary did not use terms like “we need to FIGHT” or to charge her VP with treason. Yet more false equivalence from you.
Click to expand...
Hillary like Trump alleged the elections were stolen.
 
watsup said:
We can read your narrative about blacks. It says much about who you are.
Click to expand...
But it is fine to ask about murder rates for whites?

What I say about blacks is this. Blacks have some outstanding citizens of America. Blacks have done a lot of good things for America.

Find fault with that authoritarian.
 
watsup said:
And yet there are Republicans in both the House and the Senate who are voting against Trump.
Click to expand...
Not enough of either.

I suppose you also accept the impeachment filed against Biden?
 
Robertinfremont said:
But it is fine to ask about murder rates for whites?

What I say about blacks is this. Blacks have some outstanding citizens of America. Blacks have done a lot of good things for America.

Find fault with that authoritarian.
Click to expand...

Then why was it that you only asked about blacks committing murder in Spfld instead of blacks AND whites. I say again, your narrative as shown by that question says a whole lot about who you really are.
 
Robertinfremont said:
I am pleased she has a column. I was led to believe by her interview she was now a ruined woman. No wonder her ruin thrills you.
Click to expand...

She has a newspaper column but “free speech””.. Sometimes your free speech is rejected because it’s bullshit, not because you are repressed..
 
BlueTex said:
She has a newspaper column but “free speech””.. Sometimes your free speech is rejected because it’s bullshit, not because you are repressed..
Click to expand...
My frees speech is not rejected for that reason. It is rejected to suppress my speech.
 
watsup said:
Then why was it that you only asked about blacks committing murder in Spfld instead of blacks AND whites. I say again, your narrative as shown by that question says a whole lot about who you really are.
Click to expand...
I see so you are butt hurt I asked about blacks and not whites. I did some checking and blacks are only about 4.5 percent of Springfield. Maybe now you feel better.
 
Robertinfremont said:
I see so you are butt hurt I asked about blacks and not whites. I did some checking and blacks are only about 4.5 percent of Springfield. Maybe now you feel better.
Click to expand...

You are the one who insisted on asking ONLY about black murders in Spfld. Why are you so hung up on blacks? What is your problem in that regard anyway?
 
watsup said:
You are the one who insisted on asking ONLY about black murders in Spfld. Why are you so hung up on blacks? What is your problem in that regard anyway?
Click to expand...
I have no such problem.
 
Robertinfremont said:
(YouTube, Facebook, Twitter daily censors)
Click to expand...
This right here shows your ignorance on what free speech rights are. These are privately owned platforms, and in the same way that I can kick you off my private property if I don't like what you say, so too do they have the right to limit and regulate what is on their private property. If there was a legal requirement that you be on such (which would be a freedom of association violation in and of itself), then there would be a case. But there isn't and freedom of speech has not been violated by these privately owned platforms.
 
maquiscat said:
This right here shows your ignorance on what free speech rights are. These are privately owned platforms, and in the same way that I can kick you off my private property if I don't like what you say, so too do they have the right to limit and regulate what is on their private property. If there was a legal requirement that you be on such (which would be a freedom of association violation in and of itself), then there would be a case. But there isn't and freedom of speech has not been violated by these privately owned platforms.
Click to expand...

Remember us making that argument about the Baker?

Google and Twitter and the major papers are corporations.

They are owned not by a person, but by groups of humans.

Corporations must follow other rules due to the public ownership of them.

I am not arguing this on free speech anyway. I am arguing that the media owned by the public follows other rules than you or I follow.
PS thank Democrats for those other rules.
 
Robertinfremont said:
Every human has the right to deny lies told about them. As you deny yourself.
Click to expand...

The evidence supports my posts. I note that you did not answer my question, Why was it so important to you to know about BLACK murders in Spfld, but not a word about white murders. That is evidence that supports my conclusion.
 
watsup said:
Denial.
Click to expand...
This is your bigoted statement .... You are the one who insisted on asking ONLY about black murders in Spfld. Why are you so hung up on blacks? What is your problem in that regard anyway?

It does not mean what you claim it means. The question put to me is why am I hung up on blacks

My correct reply is I am not hung up on blacks.

But perhaps it is you hung up on whites.

Factually I praised blacks and perhaps you want that to stop.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom