So are you dening that O'Rielly said what Mediamatters has quote him from saying? Are you denying that O'Rielly either used as Mediamatters says, a debunked report by conservative Kurtz or some swedish study that no one seems to be able to find?
So now you dont believe the definintion of falsification all of a sudden? How about you look it up in a dictionary.. there are a few online.
falsification - Definitions from Dictionary.com
I have never claimed that any of the other major news media are "not biased". I have claimed they are not AS biased as Fox News, but that was in a different thread long ago. And anyways we are not talking about bias at Fox News, but of a "Dan Rather" situation, which is using false or fabricated information in a story. And it is you that have attempted to divert attention away from the issue of Fox News by bringing in other news organisations that are not related.
Again your continuous pounding away against me is just another attempt to divert attention away from topic at hand. So far you have not mentioned anything that is at all relevant to the debate at hand. You have instead resorted to personal attacks.
It is you that sees Mediamatters as biased. It is you that refuses to accept Ofcom's ruling. It is you that refuses to accept the evidence presented. If the evidence is "tainted" then prove it. Prove that O'Rielly used an existing Swedish report on gay marriage with those statistics. Prove that the supposed quotes from Kerry were actually true.
We shall see. Its often hard to see anything in the massive amounts of bla bla and personal attacks.
About time, even though you again resort to personal attacks yet again.
Funny how you agree with me, but when it comes to Fox News , then they have never done so... and you claim not to be a Fox News fan? gezz. Hello, they have even ADMITTED to have used false/fake or made up facts.
Now if you had just posted this opinion in the first post you did, instead of resorting to personal attacks and the usual tactics, then we could both have spared lots of time.
I have put my money where my mouth is in this thread so to say, and you are the one thats avoiding it with long bla bla posts, personal attacks and refusing to believe the source of the evidence, not to mention refuse to answer simple questions. I see no reason to start a new debate on the same issue in another thread somewhere else.
If you are so headbent on debating it somewhere else, than in this thread, then fine you post what debate you want to debate with me.
Dare away. As I have stated, I see no reason to start a new debate on the same topic somewhere else. It will most likely result in the same personal attacks, avoidance tactics and other forms of right wing spin tactics as you have used in this thread. If you want to debate it somewhere else, then post, and maybe I will post there too, but as far as I am concerned you are just trying to avoid the subject yet again.
But I have no doubt that you will now claim (yet again) victory.
But let me remind you and others.
You are the one doing the personal attacks.
You are the one refusing to believe the opositions evidence and not debunking the evidence, but instead labling it coming from a "liberal website".
You are the one dismissing as jokes or mistakes, those episodes with false/fake or made up news/information on Fox News that are beyond doubt.
You are the one who attempted to divert attention towards the poster (me) or bring in other media (other than CBS).
You are the one who has continuesly used huge posts with no content to dilute the debate.
You are the one defending Fox News, and yet agree that using false/fake or made up facts is wrong. This is called a double standard if you dont know.
Now if you wish to debate without resorting to the above tactics, then fine I am game.