- Joined
- Oct 13, 2016
- Messages
- 14,242
- Reaction score
- 7,597
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
No one is indoctrinating kids. It's ok for kids to know that Mrs. Johnson's wife baked cookies for the class. It's ok for kids to know that they don't necessarily have to like the opposite gender.
That's the lefts plan: "to weaponize this (or any) law against anything (and everything) heterosexual"
Define normal.The eventual goal will be to return to a society that actively promotes normal relationships
Not hating gay people isn't an opinion, so no opinion is being taught.Keep your opinions to yourself in K-3.
There’s a constitutional right for a multinational business to have quasi governmental powers over a for profit theme park development?It does matter because you're talking about treading on constitutional rights.
Actually that is very much an opinion.Not hating gay people isn't an opinion, so no opinion is being taught.
There’s a constitutional right for a multinational business to have quasi governmental powers over a for profit theme park development?
Somebody posted a tweet or some such that laid it out well. Where she said all children would be referred to by gender neutral pronouns and no hetero relationships would be discussed.That's the lefts plan: "to weaponize this (or any) law against anything (and everything) heterosexual"
But you’re ok with indoctrination you approve of.LOL! What a twisted conclusion. Go enjoy your LGBTQ lifestyle and leave indoctrinating K-3 children out of it.
The rabid right. You know, the “freedom”According to whom?
Fixing it would make it unconstitutional.Then the law will just be amended to fix it.
Three years of being different and their difference is a forbidden topic? Getting tortured by conservative’s kids and the teachers are forbidden by law to address it because it is a forbidden topic?There is NOTHING in the Florida law which even mentions the word "gay", and teachers at not prohibited from using that word, so maybe you should have taken the time to read the actual law before commenting from ignorance on it.
There is also NO unlimited free speech in an elementary school classroom anyway. Same way there is no unlimited free speech in a private work place. A teacher is not permitted to come to class and attempt to evangelize students to some particular brand of religious belief; every school district in the country has the ability to prevent that, even with the force of law behind them.
All the Florida law does is to provide a policy in which sexual topics are limited to age appropriateness. In this case until 4th grade and beyond. What it is so wrong with that?
No it doesn’t. The constitution does not protect communication of the idea sodomy is equal to naturally ordered actsFixing it would make it unconstitutional.
In violation of the equal protection clause.
It has to apply to all sexual orientations (including straight) or none.
The equal protection clause means groups, individuals, must be treated equally.No it doesn’t. The constitution does not protect communication of the idea sodomy is equal to naturally ordered acts
Keep your opinions to yourself in K-3.
No, the constitution requires no such thing.The equal protection clause means groups, individuals, must be treated equally.
If sexual orientation is off limits then it's off limits. If a book that has a family with parents who are gay is off limits, then books featuring parents whose sexual orientation is straight are also off limits.
If a gay kiss is off limits then so is a straight kiss.
Which rules out all of these.
To use one of your quotes, phys:Years from now, Florida's Don't Say Gay law is going to be taught in law schools as an example of how not to write a law.
Equal protection clause.No, the constitution requires no such thing.
To use one of your quotes, phys:
Years from now, Florida's Don't Say Gay law is going to be taught in law schools as an example of how to write a law that fires up a voter base and propels a politician into the national spotlight.
Your political fantasy might just be transformed into posters carried by crazed Liberals who march to overturn that popular law just signed by DeSantis:
You have to work the protests a little harder to get them on a poster that makes sense.
- I WANT mainstream, liberal parents to weaponize this law against anything heterosexual in the curricula.
- Straight IS a sexual orientation, which the law bans.
- Hell let's go for broke and get the Bible banned from Florida classrooms.
- And no more pictures of teachers' opposite-sex spouses on their desks, because that's obvious indoctrination
BLM did it and look where it got them.
Ever since I was 10 years old I had a fondness for the opposite gender.No one is indoctrinating kids. It's ok for kids to know that Mrs. Johnson's wife baked cookies for the class. It's ok for kids to know that they don't necessarily have to like the opposite gender.
Simply that your antipathy toward the new law is off track and on the wrong side of the national society.What exactly are you trying to say in that unhinged rant?
Ever since I was 10 years old I had a fondness for the opposite gender.
That's OK, right?
Simply that your antipathy toward the new law is off track and on the wrong side of the national society.
Ever since I was 10 years old I had a fondness for the opposite gender.
That's OK, right?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?