• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

First Rudy and now Alan Dershowitz

apdst

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
133,631
Reaction score
30,937
Location
Bagdad, La.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
In the past six months or so this Mueller thing has become more and more overtly political. When the SDNY jumped in the political bent became not just open knowledge buy a rallying call for new appointees. The primary was run on the promise to make the "investigation" as political as possible.

We're no longer operating under a system of Constitutional justice. We're operating under a system of political "justice" and that's a REALLY bad thing.

I think they've opened Pandora's box.
 

Mach

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
24,432
Reaction score
17,910
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
You brought it up.

I brought up Dershowitz, the topic.
You brought up Clinton, then asked a bait question about Clinton as follow-up.

And you're baiting again, claiming I brought up Clinton.
 

Mr Person

A Little Bitter
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Oct 14, 2015
Messages
59,975
Reaction score
51,350
Location
Massachusetts
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
I bet Derzo****z is going down too!

For what? Sullying his reputation as a great lawyer by using the "collusion isn't a crime" gambit when he knows full well what the appointment letter and Code of Federal Regulations actually require Mueller to look into?

I mean, at the very least Harvard shouldn't let him teach anymore. If an attorney fell for the "collusion" line I couldn't trust their opinion on anything, because the attorney knows what I just said and if they didn't know it, they know how to find out about it.

But going down in the Mueller investigation? Hey wait a minute.... maybe you meant that bout Dersh in a different sense, and in regard to Trump.
 

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,557
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
For what? Sullying his reputation as a great lawyer by using the "collusion isn't a crime" gambit when he knows full well what the appointment letter and Code of Federal Regulations actually require Mueller to look into?

I mean, at the very least Harvard shouldn't let him teach anymore. If an attorney fell for the "collusion" line I couldn't trust their opinion on anything, because the attorney knows what I just said and if they didn't know it, they know how to find out about it.

But going down in the Mueller investigation? Hey wait a minute.... maybe you meant that bout Dersh in a different sense, and in regard to Trump.

Brennan said well known names are going down in the next 60 days. I have no doubt that Derzo****z is on that list. Possibly in connection to Epstein. How that relates to Mueller as of now, I don't really know, but there's connections within the Trump business world and it'll make you wonder why Derzo****s went for Trump in the first place. It's more and more that there is no genuine support in the elite media for Trump save for a few Fox News hosts, the rest are criminals he has blackmail on.
 

apdst

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
133,631
Reaction score
30,937
Location
Bagdad, La.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
I brought up Dershowitz, the topic.
You brought up Clinton, then asked a bait question about Clinton as follow-up.

And you're baiting again, claiming I brought up Clinton.

You brought up people connected to Epstein. I brought up people connected to Epstein. :lamo
 

Mach

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
24,432
Reaction score
17,910
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
You brought up people connected to Epstein. I brought up people connected to Epstein. :lamo

Wrong, the thread is about Dershowitz's inexplicable, shameful defense of team-Trump.
I brought up Dershowitz's connection to the Trump administration that could be cause for such insanity (via Acosta and the Epstein case).

You brought up other people, unrelated to the OP, connected to Epstein, because you're gas-lighting as usual.
 
Top Bottom