One again with Dems, Libs, and Progs, any accusation is really a confession of what they themselves are guilty of.
This proven so often now, it should go without saying.
There are but not very many.There are liberals in this forum?
All I see are boiler plate authoritarian leftists.
He’s saying selective and political prosecutions happen in his DOJ.he was saying it about hunter's case.
not trumps cases.
If you'd step out of the Dem's MSM propaganda media echo chamber, you'd have already found out. Alternatively, you could search these forums for 'confession', not that I think you'd do either, but there it is."proven"...where? how? lol
This. I would agree with him if they had been prosecuted and found guilty for things they didn't actually do. Now I've stated numerous times that the strongest argument to classify the NY Trump criminal case in this manner is that it was a novel legal theory. What doesn't change is Trump didn't pay out his hush money payment in a way that wouldn't be problematic.Actually, Fetterman is wrong. Both Donald Trump and Hunter Biden are completely unremorseful, entirely too arrogant, treating people horribly, and law breaking pieces of shit.
He’s saying selective and political prosecutions happen in his DOJ.
so all you have is blather. lolIf you'd step out of the Dem's MSM propaganda media echo chamber, you'd have already found out. Alternatively, you could search these forums for 'confession', not that I think you'd do either, but there it is.
the Post, as usual, skews things a bit, as Trumpers love to do.
Lawfare has gone on for centuries with important people, so big deal. HOWVER, the point with Trump is that he DID payoff a prostitute, etc, etc-----a presidential candidate = it should have disqualified him. Hunter is not even a government worker, so who cares???
Trump's other law breaking is incredibly significant. Case closed.
There is NO "lawfare" and you know it-----------just because DJT says it?? Really??
Doesn't need to be frivolous at all----but fear of being irresponsible is necessary with humans....
Yeah, I know.Strange how much you have flip flopped on this.
Doesnt matter. They are either all lawfare or none of them is. Joe just made the case for the former.Fetterman is refering the NY state case against Trump, not the federal crimes we all watched him commit.
Deflection is all youve got, and its a fail.If that’s all you’ve got…?
Weisselberg plead guilty to all charges. Trump Org and Trump found guilty on all charges by two criminal court juries.
Manaforr and Stone found guilty by criminal court juries.., if patterns like the one you are attempting, matter.
BTW, post evidence of prosecutors and their families being targeted with threats of violence unless they prosecuted more severely, other than the threats against prosecutors and their investigators vs Hunter Biden.
I said Biden was talking about lawfare. Try remedial English at your local adult school.you said biden was talking about the trump cases too.
you: "He's right, These cases were all lawfare"
ALL lawfare.. your quote.
so you lied..again. lol
So you admit its lawfare. Thanks for proving my point.the Post, as usual, skews things a bit, as Trumpers love to do.
Lawfare has gone on for centuries with important people, so big deal. HOWVER, the point with Trump is that he DID payoff a prostitute, etc, etc-----a presidential candidate = it should have disqualified him. Hunter is not even a government worker, so who cares???
Trump's other law breaking is incredibly significant. Case closed.
Over/under when Fetterman changes party?
It has been "lawfare" for centuries..........changing it into a new term that sounds bad is insignificant. It's like used cars vs. "pre-owned" = same thing.So you admit its lawfare. Thanks for proving my point.
Fetterman slams legal cases against Trump, Hunter Biden in first Truth Social post: ‘Cases were both bulls—‘
Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., made a serious social media splash on Tuesday, becoming the first Democratic U.S. senator to post on President-elect Donald Trump’s platform, “Truth Social.”…nypost.com
He's right, These cases were all lawfare. Heck even Joe admitted that it was lawfare, but the libs in this forum kept saying otherwise.
Fetterman most certainly is entitled to his opinion, and it is a courageous one to make. Whether it's accurate or not … eh, it's a beauty is in the eye of the beholder type of thing. But no one will ever be as courageous as Jeannette Rankin, who held true to her pacifist roots and voted against the United States entering either World War:
Doesnt matter. They are either all lawfare or none of them is. Joe just made the case for the former.
Deflection is all youve got, and its a fail.
I said Biden was talking about lawfare. Try remedial English at your local adult school.
So you admit its lawfare. Thanks for proving my point.
Doesnt matter. They are either all lawfare or none of them is. Joe just made the case for the former.
Deflection is all youve got, and its a fail.
I said Biden was talking about lawfare. Try remedial English at your local adult school.
So you admit its lawfare. Thanks for proving my point.
You can still be courageous but controversial. I certainly would have voted for the war myself. But the fact is, she stayed true to herself and remained consistent in spite of overwhelming peer pressure. I wish we had a ton more politicians like her in that way!What are you supposed to do when well armed countries are attacking you and killing your citizens and causing huge property damage?
I'm all about peace but not everyone else is.
Trump is on audio recording showing highly classified documents to people.I agree that the trials against Trump were lawfare.
And trying to get a state SoS to find the votes he needs to win.Trump is on audio recording showing highly classified documents to people.
The only reason Bragg went after Trump is because of lawfare. He wanted to lock him up or at least taint him because he didn't want him to run for president again. That is the definition of lawfare.
There are liberals in this forum?
All I see are boiler plate authoritarian leftists.
I say it, too.That's what righties would say.
I say it, too.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?