- Joined
- Jun 20, 2018
- Messages
- 22,604
- Reaction score
- 9,988
- Location
- Miami, FL
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Is it though?
I would say a tendency to have strong emotional reactions to threats to the tribe in a world where the cynical manipulation of emotion is at the heart of every political and marketing message is quite useful in understanding where we are and how we got here.
Where virtually every message from the other side to its people is based on fear of some kind. With undertones that those fears may need to be addressed with patriotic violence.
Trump has stated repeatedly that he cannot lose the next election unless it is stolen from him. Unless the evil commie democrats commit massive coordinated fraud to impose their commie will on the American people by removing the only thing that stands between them and being forced into interracial gay marriages to Muslims, or what ever else the idiots believe.
Because the idiots are legion. We have all seen their glorious contributions to our mitigation efforts, which they have now been instructed were unnecessary in the forts place because things have improved. And they now believe.
The wholesale adoption of the tools of persuasion, developed through a century of research and experimentation in to human cognition, psychology and behavior, is how we got where we are today. Because it works. It is so ubiquitous we talk about it without thinking about it.
We call the discipline "narrative management" right now. It was "spin doctor" at one point. Both campaigns have heads of narrative management. People talk about "framing" in the news all the time. But nobody goes into what that is nor how and why it is used.
I have seen arguments that it can help people understand things better by providing a different perspective. And I would agree to an extent. Because the problem is that far too often its just encouraging a way of looking at a subject from just the right angle, in just the right light, if you squint just right, so that you adopt the perspective their clients pay them to encourage.
The entire discipline thrives on causing its subjects to misapprehend the topic at hand. That's where the money and power is at. It isn't about providing a new way of looking at a subject that results in a greater understanding. It's about providing a way to look at it that results in the understanding the client paid for in the target demographic.
Gingrich brought this into our politics. It changed our society. Don't believe me. It is a topic of great study because it marked such a clear turning point in our politics. So any search strung should yield an abundance of results.
We are adhere a society gets when it embraces cynical manipualtion as a sacred protected right. The problem of how do we protect the right to speak and address the fact that speech has been successfully "weaponized" is IMO the biggest thing we need to address.
We're about to see why, if I am reading this right.
My premise does perfectly explain the trump phenomenon.
Sorry WhatIf, but perhaps I did not explain myself clear enough. I said useless information simply because your explanation was so confusing and above most normal minds that understanding it was very difficult. You have done the same with this explanation you just gave. I see what you mean but even I, who considers myself relatively intelligent, had problems seeing and understanding what you said in a clear way.
I try to explain things in way that we all understand. Here is what I mean
Trump is like a Mafia boss that comes to town and tries to charge a fee of you for his protection, usually meaning a fee from him to personally not attack you. Evidently, if he was not in town, the protection would not be needed. He has in fact made the problem and the solution in one fell swoop with the only reason is for his own personal benefit. He has created the fear and then offered the solution.
This is exactly what Trump has done, created fear and then offered himself as the solution.
What is even worse and more worrisome is that he is so incompetent that he is actually incapable of protecting you from himself. So you pay for the protection but you are still completely at risk of him attacking you even if you paid his fee. It is the worst of both worlds.
Explaining things in this way that everyone can understand fully is better than what you said, which in some ways is basically the same, but confusing