• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal [W:234, 1861]

Re: The F.B.I. recommended no charges for Hillary Clinton over her use of email

truthatallcost said:
We saw that some US companies are "too big to fail", even though some certainly deserved to fail.

Now we see that some US citizens are too big to go to jail. Different justice is meted out depending on who you know, and Hillary Clinton happens to know quite a few very powerful people, such as Loretta Lynch.
Click to expand...

You do not like her.

In fact, you hate her.

We get that.
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

jamesrage said:
I was merely stating that she could do something really horrific and nothing would happen to her.
Click to expand...

What you stated was:

There could be a video of her molesting little kids and stomping on the heads newborn puppies and kittens and nothing would happen to her.
Click to expand...


That IS hyperbole, James.

So when you said you had not used hyperbole...you were wrong.

Why not acknowledge that you were.
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

It is unfair to call Hillary careless. She clearly cared enough to make sure so many emails were deleted.
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

Johnson said:
Do us all a yuuuge favor, would you? After you type out a post, take a minute and read it back to yourself and ask yourself "self, does what I wrote here make any sense? Is it coherent? Can it even be considered English?" Then, if the answer to any of these questions is "no", re-write your post as many times as it takes in order for it to be readable. Whatever point you've been hammering at like a testosterone-ridden chimp for the last few weeks might have more of an effect if people could actually read and understand what it is you're trying to write.
Click to expand...

Can this be understood...... science says conservatives are more wise than liberals.. THE VOTERS...Check science to see if you are not too scared to.
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

Frank Apisa said:
What you stated was:




That IS hyperbole, James.

So when you said you had not used hyperbole...you were wrong.

Why not acknowledge that you were.
Click to expand...


you liberals do NOT understand that this is your very worst nightmare.. THIS has shown that liberal voters voting destroys and is a national security issue for the nation and wakes up the conservative military and the wise to totally stop unwise voters with a wisdom test for voters....BOTH this hillary issue and the UK vote to exit the more liberal euro union and with the stock markets agreeing that UK was the winner are the clues that proves this WILL HAPPEN
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

SailaWay said:
Can this be understood...... science says conservatives are more wise than liberals.. THE VOTERS...Check science to see if you are not too scared to.
Click to expand...

Post a link to ONE scientific study that claims that conservatives are "more wise" than liberals and I'll eat a buffet of crow. I'm more than happy...hell I'm downright ecstatic to "check science" but I seriously doubt that even with extensive investigation, I won't find any proof that "science says conservatives are more wise than liberals."
 
Re: clinton walks

upsideguy said:
Well, from a theological perspective, there is not one person on the face of the earth that is innocent (even small children and babies)....

From an American legal perspective, we are all entitled to the presumption of innocence. Hillary Clinton was investigated and there was not sufficient evidence presented from that investigation to warrant a charge. Even if charged, she was entitled to the presumption of innocence.... even more so without evidence to bring a charge.

Now, perhaps you do not believe in the American legal system and prefer to be sole judge, jury and executioner? Many of us, however, believe in the institution that is America. Many of us can respect America's laws and its legal protections that include a due process that protects us from being unfairly charged, convicted and jailed (or labeled a criminal) for crimes we did not commit.

Sorry, but you don't get to say that in America (of course you can say it, but saying it is unAmerican). She is innocent, by America's definition.
Click to expand...

She was found too stupid to know what she is doing which means no crime because of insanity....the FBI should have then recommended a straight jacket and definantly recommend her not to hold public office.. this was totally DISGRACEFUL
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

Johnson said:
Post a link to ONE scientific study that claims that conservatives are "more wise" than liberals and I'll eat a buffet of crow. I'm more than happy...hell I'm downright ecstatic to "check science" but I seriously doubt that even with extensive investigation, I won't find any proof that "science says conservatives are more wise than liberals."
Click to expand...


SAT Math test scores.... this test for logic which is the most valuable part of IQ's ... also the younger one is the more liberal and as they age the more conservative.. THE REASON is they have learned ............. this is the slam dunk proof worldwide
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

AliHajiSheik said:
It is unfair to call Hillary careless. She clearly cared enough to make sure so many emails were deleted.
Click to expand...

Years after she was no longer SoS and only after the fact that she had a private server holding all those government documents came to public light did she delete them.

BTW... IIRC after she quit being SoS she was a civilian and had no government position and still doesn't. Why was she still in possession of government documents?
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

WHY in the world did the FBI director say that she was extremely careless as sec of state and NOT THEN RECOMMEND that she not to be allowed to hold higher office because of being too stupid... he said her not being charged with a crime was because of no intent and she did all that because of being extremely careless.....her around a red button... this has to take the cake the FBI director not charging her with a crime because she was too dumb and him letting her go to maybe become President... is the FBI DIRECTOR INSANE??
 
Re: clinton walks

MaggieD said:
You're kidding, right? Although her actions did not rise to the criminal level IN THE OPINION OF THE FBI, that by NO MEANS shows lack of smoking guns. She was reckless, careless and compromised the security of the United States of America.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that speech was utterly bizarre. His opening statement was:

"Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities."

And then he goes on to detail all the ways she was grossly negligent... and then suggest no charges be brought because he felt it wasn't intentional?

He can't even manage to remain consistent within his prepared speech.
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

Did you listen to the FBI Director? I paraphrase him saying, "I thinks she's guilty as a mother****er, however I will not recommended charges be brought against her.......of course if anyone else were to do this that doesn't mean there wouldn't be consequences."
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

the director didn't even recommend her not to hold important positions because of being a gross negligant person
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

jmotivator said:
Yeah, that speech was utterly bizarre. His opening statement was:

"Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities."

And then he goes on to detail all the ways she was grossly negligent... and then suggest no charges be brought because he felt it wasn't intentional?

He can't even manage to remain consistent within his prepared speech.
Click to expand...

American said:
Did you listen to the FBI Director? I paraphrase him saying, "I thinks she's guilty as a mother****er, however I will not recommended charges be brought against her.......of course if anyone else were to do this that doesn't mean there wouldn't be consequences."
Click to expand...

And all of her supporters are intentionally ignoring that very fact.
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

Kal'Stang said:
And all of her supporters are intentionally ignoring that very fact.
Click to expand...

The only thing that matters to leftwingers is winning the election.
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

SailaWay said:
SAT Math test scores.... this test for logic which is the most valuable part of IQ's ... also the younger one is the more liberal and as they age the more conservative.. THE REASON is they have learned ............. this is the slam dunk proof worldwide
Click to expand...

I don't follow
 
Re: clinton walks

MaggieD said:
You're kidding, right? Although her actions did not rise to the criminal level IN THE OPINION OF THE FBI, that by NO MEANS shows lack of smoking guns. She was reckless, careless and compromised the security of the United States of America.
Click to expand...

What I don't get--and I admit, I haven't been following this story that closely--is why the outrage is directed all towards Hillary and not Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, who both did the very same thing. What did Hillary do differently?
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

American said:
The only thing that matters to leftwingers is winning the election.
Click to expand...

Through due process. Republicans have be using Hearings and collusion to derail Clinton.

If you wanna be honest, then lets cut the crap. We all know what the purpose of Benghazi/Email was to accomplish.

I am glad the FBI director had the balls to tell the GOP...were not participating. DOJ will do the same.

The GOP lost. The game is over. Deal with it.


Now you got Donald J. Trump. Let the people decide.
 
Re: clinton walks

Middleground said:
What I don't get--and I admit, I haven't been following this story that closely--is why the outrage is directed all towards Hillary and not Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, who both did the very same thing. What did Hillary do differently?
Click to expand...

If they are guilty of what Hillary did (hint: they aren't) then they should be charged as well. Hillary HOUSED HER OWN UNSECURED SERVER IN HER BASEMENT THAT HELD ABOVE TOP SECRET INFORMATION. Maybe you can see the difference in all caps?
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

iguanaman said:
And God help Colin Powell and Condi Rice for the secret emails that turned up on their servers too. They were both equally incompetent boobs who had no place in Govt. Powell actually emailed diplomats with his AOL account! To think that some actually asked Powell and Rice to run for President....the HORROR.

The Shocking Truth: Colin Powell?s Emails Don?t Matter
Click to expand...

It is good to hear you agree with me. I just can't imagine electing someone so incompetent to be our next president.
 
Re: clinton walks

Middleground said:
What I don't get--and I admit, I haven't been following this story that closely--is why the outrage is directed all towards Hillary and not Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, who both did the very same thing. What did Hillary do differently?
Click to expand...

Three reasons.

1: Neither Colin Powell or Rice are running for POTUS. If they were then it would be guaranteed that people would be hollering just as loudly as they are about Clinton. And I've no doubt that Democrats would be the ones hollering and the Republicans downplaying it. The idiocy abounds.

2: I don't know about others, but personally I didn't even know about them doing the same as Hillary until after Hillary was exposed. And frankly I believe that they should be prosecuted also.

3: Hillary has far more scandals in her past than either Rice or Powell put together and as such deserves far more scrutiny than them. No one with that many scandals could have gotten as far as Hillary has and still be able to actually be a leading candidate for POTUS without greasing a few palms here and there at the very least. Particularly in light of the fact that for many, even ONE scandal is enough to make them a pariah in the political world. If you want some examples then look towards all the Senators/Congressmen that have resigned or lost elections due to a simple sex scandal.
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

1751Texan said:
Through due process. Republicans have be using Hearings and collusion to derail Clinton.

If you wanna be honest, then lets cut the crap. We all know what the purpose of Benghazi/Email was to accomplish.

I am glad the FBI director had the balls to tell the GOP...were not participating. DOJ will do the same.

The GOP lost. The game is over. Deal with it.


Now you got Donald J. Trump. Let the people decide.
Click to expand...

And you will ignore the negligent manner in which Hillary handled classified material, as detailed by Comey?
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

1751Texan said:
Through due process. Republicans have be using Hearings and collusion to derail Clinton.

If you wanna be honest, then lets cut the crap. We all know what the purpose of Benghazi/Email was to accomplish.

I am glad the FBI director had the balls to tell the GOP...were not participating. DOJ will do the same.

The GOP lost. The game is over. Deal with it.


Now you got Donald J. Trump. Let the people decide.
Click to expand...

When are YOU going to ****ing get it that she compromised classified data at the highest level? Whether it was intentional or not is irrelevant. She did it!
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

SailaWay said:
SAT Math test scores.... this test for logic which is the most valuable part of IQ's ... also the younger one is the more liberal and as they age the more conservative.. THE REASON is they have learned ............. this is the slam dunk proof worldwide
Click to expand...

Whatever you think you've proven here...your "slam dunk" is not a link to the science that you claimed without doubt "proves conservatives are wiser than liberals". If the science is there, all you have to do is post a link. Otherwise you're just shouting crazy talk like a hobo screaming about the end of the world on a street corner.
 
Re: F.B.I. Recommends No Charges Against Hillary Clinton for Use of Personal Email[W:

1751Texan said:
Through due process. Republicans have be using Hearings and collusion to derail Clinton.

If you wanna be honest, then lets cut the crap. We all know what the purpose of Benghazi/Email was to accomplish.

I am glad the FBI director had the balls to tell the GOP...were not participating. DOJ will do the same.

The GOP lost. The game is over. Deal with it.


Now you got Donald J. Trump. Let the people decide.
Click to expand...

Yes, through due process. Where was that due process when people demanded that Zimmerman be tried despite the cops and even the prosecutor believing that no charges should be brought to bear due to self defense evidence? The people demanded that a trial be held, and one was held. Why is the same not being done for Hillary?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom