• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI Probe of Kavanaugh Is Expected to Wrap Up Very Soon

What leads you to that conclusion? If Kav is confirmed, millions of angry women, including Republican women, will be voting Dem.

Not ANY of the Republican women I know. They are about ready to flush the liberal Senators.
 
Or actually does the opposite. This hurts Democrats on November.

You lost the Presidency 34 states to 16. You lost the Senate. You lost the House. You have very few governorships. And now you've lost the Supreme Court for a generation, and Ginsburg is circling the drain.

But tell yourself what you desperately need to hear.

Uh, it was 30 states to 20 states, and the three states that put Trump (barely) over the edge was based on a few thousand votes, and that was more due to Hillary than Trump himself as a candidate.

The pendulum swings back and forth, and Trump and the GOP have done NOTHING to increase their support with anyone outside of their rabid base.
 
Your post makes absolutely no sense.

Maybe not to you, but it does take a remedial level of intelligence and a very small amount of effort to figure out what it means. Are you sure you cant figure it out?
 
It's obvious you're fabricating this. I've lived in MA. It's not Kansas.
oh gosh, you've lived in MA? Well there it is folks, I've been caught. Theres no way people, especially females were talking like this on the radio in MA if they knew this guy had lived there. You should have prefaced that you lived in MA. You sneaky devil, now my story much like Kavanaughs is falling apart against your compelling claim of once living in Ma. Why you heard future radio while living in MA...thats fascinating and some tuner you got there.
 
How would those millions of women who've experienced sexual assault and who have sons go on this?

What about the millions of women who've experienced sexual assault and have daughters?

What about the millions of women who've experienced sexual assault who don't have children at all?


How about the millions of women who've experienced REAL sexual assault, not just a grope, and are insulted by women who wait 30+ years to tell how someone tried to take their clothes off.
 
It appears that you had this response prepared and standing by, just waiting for the investigation to be over. The only remaining question is will you have the intestinal forttitude to give the FBI credit for doing their job, finally.

Surely you joke.
 
How about the millions of women who've experienced REAL sexual assault, not just a grope, and are insulted by women who wait 30+ years to tell how someone tried to take their clothes off.

They're part of the problem. And it's not millions. It's a few self centered ignorant hateful women.
 
How about the millions of women who've experienced REAL sexual assault, not just a grope, and are insulted by women who wait 30+ years to tell how someone tried to take their clothes off.

Notice too how the feminists dont have a good answer to the questioning of their morality for their constantly working to blur the lines and play like all things that women dont like that men do are major transgressions upon women on the scale of Whoopie's rape rape..... for how they have degraded women who are actually grossly trespassed upon by men.

THey dont care, women who are rape raped are collateral damage in their effort to drive their poltical agenda against men.
 
It should be more than obvious to any rational person that the fix is in and this so called investigation is a sham. The only remaining question is if Flake and Collins and Murkowski will have the fortitude to stand up and say it is.

How can they say it is?
They've all received the analysis report by Rachel Mitchell! Their intelligence - and integrity - will be put into question if they don't see through the sham of this alleged accusation(s)! That's where the sham is!

Will they be party to - in cahoots with the Dems - in destroying an innocent man's life and reputation?
That's the choice they'll have to make.
 
Ok, I was quoting you but I guess in some mythical world I wasn't responding to you.


Does that make you feel better?

this from you is NOT quoting me

Quote Originally Posted by dobieg View Post
I'm helping you with your snot blowing problem.

Maybe on the playground that passes for biting wit - but in actual debate it makes no sense.
 
why the outrage at an innocent man?
they should blame the people that did it to them

Kavanaugh didn't do anything to them.
ol yea i forgot that doesn't matter.
You are projecting your opinion as a solid fact. That’s a logical flaw.
 
It appears that you had this response prepared and standing by, just waiting for the investigation to be over. The only remaining question is will you have the intestinal forttitude to give the FBI credit for doing their job, finally.

I will be more than happy to credit them with doing their job - should they do it and the investigation is thorough and reaches all the proper witnesses who have publicly said they have information to offer but the FBI has not contacted them.
 
How can they say it is?
They've all received the analysis report by Rachel Mitchell! Their intelligence - and integrity - will be put into question if they don't see through the sham of this alleged accusation(s)! That's where the sham is!

Will they be party to - in cahoots with the Dems - in destroying an innocent man's life and reputation?
That's the choice they'll have to make.

The actions of Kavanaugh destroyed his own reputation.
 
You are projecting your opinion as a solid fact. That’s a logical flaw.

Nope i am stating facts as facts.

unless you think Kavanaugh is a bigger serial rapits than you already do and attacked all those women?
their misplaced outrage has no place. They should be blaming the people that did it to them no kavanaugh.

He has nothing to do with them being attacked
and there is no evidence that he has assaulted anyone.
 
How about the millions of women who've experienced REAL sexual assault, not just a grope, and are insulted by women who wait 30+ years to tell how someone tried to take their clothes off.

"Why don't sexual assault victims come forward sooner?"
 
Joking about him having his response canned and standing by, or joking about him having the intestinal fortitude to credit the FBI? I didn't joke about either.
Surely you joke.
 
You're wrong and I suspect you're in for quite a rude awakening if you think she'll vote "no" when the FBI report finds no conclusive evidence.

https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/10/02/po...ess/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/&rm=1

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Murkowski votes no on Kavanugh.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortn...eaking-murkowski-votes-no-on-cloture-n2525808

nSYBnTT.jpg
 
Is that your lunch? FBI report came back clean.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Really? I have not had the opportunity to read it. Perhaps you could reprint it here or provide a link to it ?
 
Is that your lunch? FBI report came back clean.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Now you're being dishonest. Man up and admit you were wrong when you said Morkowski would vote yes.

I hope you like crow. It could be an acquired taste for you.
 
Really? I have not had the opportunity to read it. Perhaps you could reprint it here or provide a link to it ?
Nice trolling. If there were anything incriminating, you can be sure Booker, Harris, Mazie or Feinstein would have mentioned it. But Flake who called for it in the first place gave Kav the thumbs up.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 
Now you're being dishonest. Man up and admit you were wrong when you said Morkowski would vote yes.

I hope you like crow. It could be an acquired taste for you.
I misread what you were talking about. Yes, I admit Murkowski was disappointing, but doesn't matter. Joe Manchin was a yes. It cleared 51-49. He'll be confirmed tomorrow, regardless.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom