- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 88,714
- Reaction score
- 65,726
- Location
- New Mexico
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
White nationalists
Black Lives Matter
ANTIFA
KKK
All one in the same.
Who didn't see this false equivelence bs coming?
White nationalists
Black Lives Matter
ANTIFA
KKK
All one in the same.
I highly doubt that there were very many Trump voters in the counter protesters. They caused just as many problems, if not more, than the idiot white nationalists did.
The way I see Dallas.... BLM had a history of shouting about death to police, in their main marching formations...
So..... this man was just acting on the words of previous BLM protests.
We don't know much more about this kid except he was hanging out with some of the white nationalists earlier in the day, hanging out with the "American Vanguard" group. I don't know if someone within the American Vanguard group managed to convince him to decided to run a bunch of people over or not, time will tell as more information is known (this did just happen yesterday after all). However, white supremacy had a history of violence back in its hayday.... not so much lately until now.
How do you know yet whether or not it was politically motivated?
So are you going to argue that in the context of the protests in VA where the driver killed other protesters, which you described as:Show me where i admitted that the driver was motivated by his political ideology. While you try to find something that does't exist, I'm going to get a bite to eat. I'll be back in a bit when you've given up.
So are you going to argue that in the context of the protests in VA where the driver killed other protesters, which you described as:
"an act of rage against a group of people who were on the other side of his thinking"
...was not about political ideology? Was it, as you keep absurdly distracting to a "sports" ideology?
Yer argument is insane.
You mean the southern Democrats that switched to republicants in the 60's because they opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act? The same "Dixiecrats" that supported segregation. Nice try, dude! Try as you may to paint Democrats as the party of hate it only points back at you and your party as the ones that condone race hatred.
And I've not seen any evidence that "BLM" was present in Charlottesville or, if they were, that any member of BLM committed any act of violence.
That is like saying that the black vote was at a all time high during Obama's election.
Are they racists for more of them sitting home during the last election because a black candidate wasn't running.
I don't have any doubt....but you keep avoiding whut "ideology" he acted "with rage" against. You are the one with the requirement to explain whut "ideology" he acted upon when you said:Do you know for a fact that the driver was politically motivated?
Do you know for a fact that the driver was politically motivated? What did he hope to change, politically, by doing what he did?
This will be entertaining to say the least.
opcorn2:
The Leftists came armed to do violence against a legal demonstration. They did violence. That makes them responsible.
The criminal is always responsible for ALL those injured in the commission of his crime, whether by accident or intent.
:ind:
Cut off the income of an already fringe person.
That won't cause anything bad to happen, not at all.
I know it feels good to **** with people like that, but you should ask if you should do that.
It's not a question of knowing how to post a video but whether doing so in this case would violate forum rules because of the content.
Lol ! Yea because Blacks are doing SOOO well in decades old Democrat strong holds like Detroit, Chicago, Flynt, Atlanta, LA, etc, etc etc......
Democrats went from overt racism like Jim Crowe to pushing policies that created and perpetuated generational dependence and policies that lead to the destruction of families and all in the name of securing a vote.
Nothings changed, your party still supports the plantation mentallity, and cities like Detroit prove it everyday.
Roughly half of Detroit residents are functionally illiterate and half of Californian children are on welfare so spare me your ****ing revisionsist bull ****
You are right... Their way of thinking is unacceptable. They need to be brought in for forced Re-education and ThoughtCrime. Just deploy the Thought Police in full numbers and we'll get these suckers just you wait.
True, Plantation owners weren't big fans of things changing. However, as is very visible between how young 20 something Americans feel about things politically, and how, even their parents, feel politically, and how their parents parents feel politically, things change over generations.
This is just my opinon (theory).. When black slaves arrived in the colonies fresh from africa in the earlier years, they were viewed by most as savages (that view isn't my theory, its real). It could be viewed that it made them easier to be viewed as such because they didn't know the language, weren't a part of "the religion" (meh), generally had different cultural values. Even in the north in the early days of slavery african slaves were viewed as savages originally. As those slaves had slave children raised in American slavery, they learned the language, practiced the religion, and thus became more viewed as "human". It was easier in the North, which was less dependent upon cheap labor for the abolitionist ideals to spread. In the south, the plantation owners had plenty of economical reasons to keep slavery alive and supported. I wouldn't have doubt that they kept the idea of superiority fueled with propaganda to maintain this support amongst those who weren't economically dependent upon it.
But I digress, how long it would have lasted... who knows. Outside as well as inside influences would have eventually brought it to and end even in the CSA if the south was left as a separate nation.
Honestly, I think economically the south would have been forced to rejoin the USA eventually if left on its own regardless.
I don't have any doubt....but you keep avoiding whut "ideology" he acted "with rage" against. You are the one with the requirement to explain whut "ideology" he acted upon when you said:
"an act of rage against a group of people who were on the other side of his thinking"
I want everyone to get a long and while it's retardedly idealistic, it's better than picking a side.
No employer should be forced to hold on to an employee whose antagonistic views go against the philosophy of the company. And before you say it, that goes for violence-endorsing ideologues both on the left and right.
It boggles the mind as to how you can reach the conclusion you did in such a record setting pace.
I support the free speech rights of every citizen of this country. I've said nothing to the contrary here or at any other point in my time here at DP (or in my lifetime for that matter). I've not even hinted that anyone deserved to die yesterday and for you to make that reach reverts back to the whole "mind blowing" thing I mentioned previously. It's quite clear that you haven't been paying attention at all in this thread and more specifically when it comes to my posts. I even called the white nationalists out as being the pieces of **** that they are in the very post you quoted me on. So since I don't favor either side, your vision isn't very clear at all. Better luck next time!
White supremacists and neo-nazis aren't interested in "getting along."
Did you see the twitter he linked?
They're attempting to get people fired who attended the rally.
Do you not see the issue with both escalation and other unintended consequences?
Lol ! Yea because Blacks are doing SOOO well in decades old Democrat strong holds like Detroit, Chicago, Flynt, Atlanta, LA, etc, etc etc......
Democrats went from overt racism like Jim Crowe to pushing policies that created and perpetuated generational dependence and policies that lead to the destruction of families and all in the name of securing a vote.
Nothings changed, your party still supports the plantation mentallity, and cities like Detroit prove it everyday.
Roughly half of Detroit residents are functionally illiterate and half of Californian children are on welfare so spare me your ****ing revisionsist bull ****
And the Nazis and neo confederates who came didn't intend to violence and weren't armed to the teeth?
By saying "its the left's fault" you mitigate the responsibility of the person who actually committed a crime.
If the shoe was on the other foot, if a left winger drove a car into crowd and blamed the right for his actions, would you except such an excuse?