Here's a question: Is this topic entirely designed to bash left leaning individuals while offering nothing constructive in the manner of debate or discussion, while also ignoring the fact that the current Chairman of the Republican party, Michael Steele, is black and could easily be an indicator of the answer to this question?
And we have a winner! What makes it even more amusing is many of us liberals, probably most even, try and avoid the accusations of racism.
Pavlov was spot effing on.
An honest lefty (oxymoron) would attempt to answer the questions. Shall I copy / paste threads / comments devoted to labeling your ideological opposition as 'racists'?
An honest lefty only bothers to answer honest questions, not bait.
The date: November, 2020.
The circumstance: The first staunchly conservative black is elected POTUS.
The question(s): Would leftist's immediately drop their current and prolific accusitory 'racist' labeling of ideological opposition...... suddenly shift gears and rally the troops around parroting statements like "Well, shucks...she's a great lady....we just disagree with her ideology"?
Or:
Would such an occurrence render lefties speechless, redfaced, and rolling on the floor in apoploptic seizures?
It depends on the individual person and their views. . .
So...it's "bait" when a conservative presents an intellectual conundrum for the left, huh? Shall I....you know....copy / paste some lefty "bait"....?
Or....maybe, you'll answer the questions instead of doing everything possible to deflect from them.
Individuals and their views.....like those the Tea party rallys may have attracted?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?