- Joined
- Mar 7, 2011
- Messages
- 44,814
- Reaction score
- 20,221
- Location
- A very blue state
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
and yet, the authors of the Stand Your Ground law, have ALL said that Zimmerman cannot use the law as a defense in this case.
...YOU are the one saying following someone is intimidation. I've been followed before by someone, I didn't shoot them.....
Again, the police dispatcher (likely had Zimmerman's 50 plus call record in pulled up too) told Zimmerman not to handle the problem. The fact of the matter is that had Zimmerman not decided he was a one man vigilante, Martin would be alive and with his family now. Of course we have the actual recording of Martin speaking to his girlfriend as Zimmerman stalked him and he was afraid. End of the day, Zimmerman killed Martin. He will get to pay for that, at least in a civil suit, hopefully in a criminal one too.Again, Zimmerman might have felt he could handle the problem. However, if the kid wasn't really scared and attacked Zimmerman, Zimmerman would be in the right to shoot the kid.
So far many people are just assuming Martin is this nice happy go lucky kid with no aggresive act in his body. We don't know what actions the boy took either.
That's all I'm saying is we don't know all the facts and people are making Zimmerman guilty automatically. It is not illegla to get out of your car.
Again, the police dispatcher (likely had Zimmerman's 50 plus call record in pulled up too) told Zimmerman not to handle the problem. The fact of the matter is that had Zimmerman not decided he was a one man vigilante, Martin would be alive and with his family now. Of course we have the actual recording of Martin speaking to his girlfriend as Zimmerman stalked him and he was afraid. End of the day, Zimmerman killed Martin. He will get to pay for that, at least in a civil suit, hopefully in a criminal one too.
so, the kid was soo scared he callled his girlfriend and not the cops.
Well, they actually said it wasn't their intent. Whether or not he can use it as a defense should be decided by a grand jury or a judge, ideally. I guess in this case, the Sanford PD has decided that they are the grand jury.
It is the fact that Zimmerman ignored the 911 operator's advice not to follow Martin that former Sen. Peaden says disqualifies him from claiming self-defense under the law.
"The guy lost his defense right then," Peaden told the Miami Herald. "When he said 'I'm following him,' he lost his defense." Rep. Dennis Baxley, Peaden's co-sponsor in the Florida House, agrees with his former colleague, telling the newspaper that the law does not license neighborhood watch or others who feel "like they have the authority to pursue and confront people. That is aggravating an incident right there."
No I agree with you about the facts and Zimmerman's automatic guilty, but there are plenty who are screaming he is in no way guilty as well. And I know we do not know much about Martin. But I was just saying that it was stupid beyond all stupid to get out of that car. The kid knows you are following him and you are going to get out and walk up to him?
Noone is saying Zimmerman was very bright. However, being stupid isn't illegal and it doesn't mean you are guilty just because you are stupid.
yes, following someone in a car and then on foot, in the middle of the night and the rain, is pretty intimidating.
Martin was right to be in fear.
Yip this is what my "legal experts" tell me, read friends and clients who are lawyers.Actually, both co-sponsors said this:
Author of "stand your ground" law: George Zimmerman should probably be arrested for killing Trayvon Martin - Crimesider - CBS News
I agree, but his stupidity reads as aggresive, and Martin in his mind, was probably defending himself. And as of now, I am not sure of his innocence and guilt because the police dropped the ball and it makes it harder to tell, but he made incredible stupid and wrong decisions and a young kid died because of it.
What they are saying now doesn't matter. It's what the law indicates, it's written down. I think SYGL as written is exactly what they intended, and it worked as intended. The only thing that screwed it up was national news. There is still a chance for someone to use the SYGL to apply perfect justice, but maybe not the way that was intended by the authors.and yet, the authors of the Stand Your Ground law, have ALL said that Zimmerman cannot use the law as a defense in this case.
Or assuming a white guy who shot a black kid in an affluent neighborhood must have been a racist?
Now that the "CONCERN" for justice is growing nationwide by soon to be millions of people who have no idea whatsoever what the facts are, the alledged shooter has virtually no chance in this country of getting a fair trial. This mob of uneducated civilans act only out of emotion, not out of intellect. Now Da Rev., convicted coke dealer Al Razor-Sharpton sees another chance to get on Teee-Veee. Do not charge this man with anything as it will be a waste of money to try to convict now. O.J. was aquitted for one reason-fear of riots by the same people. Let them riot as long as they burn their own homes which they bought with free federal money
Yes, but again, you don't know the kid's actions either. If the kid was not aggresive, he might be alive as well.
All I'm saying is we don't know.
I would saying calling a black kid a "#@$#@ Coon" is a pretty racist thing to do.
Uhm what is perfectly legal? I'm pretty sure all of the above, including ignoring police dispatch directives, culminating in the death of the person you are following is not only illegal, but prosecutable. Following a thorough investigation that is, which this incident did not receive.And perfectly LEGAL
Again, the police dispatcher (likely had Zimmerman's 50 plus call record in pulled up too) told Zimmerman not to handle the problem. The fact of the matter is that had Zimmerman not decided he was a one man vigilante, Martin would be alive and with his family now. Of course we have the actual recording of Martin speaking to his girlfriend as Zimmerman stalked him and he was afraid. End of the day, Zimmerman killed Martin. He will get to pay for that, at least in a civil suit, hopefully in a criminal one too.
Has it actually come out as that being what he said?
I agree and with the situation under intense scrutiny now there should be some serious consideration. But too much rabble rousing doesn't improve the justice system. The excessive attention on the Casey Anthony case most likely fouled the process and tainted the jury pool.
Uhm what is perfectly legal? I'm pretty sure all of the above, including ignoring police dispatch directives, culminating in the death of the person you are following is not only illegal, but prosecutable. Following a thorough investigation that is, which this incident did not receive.
...And if Martin thought he was being stalked, he could have called the police. He didn't.
The dispatch was not an actual police officer therefore not illegal to ignore.
And if Martin thought he was being stalked, he could have called the police. He didn't.
Yes, it was on the 911 call.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?