• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Facebook Bans Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos, Other Far-Right Figures

3leftsdoo said:
Nonsense. Incorrect. Facebook's unconstitutional conduct will be addressed by the Supremes.
Click to expand...

And another non-answers with nothing but platitudes and mindlessly simple "incorrect" responses. You have not proved one time what Facebook is doing is illegal (FYI, they are not) and that it will be addressed by the Supreme court (they have better things to do than help petty right wing hate posters who were stupid enough to get banned by FB).
 
3leftsdoo said:
Unlawful - As long as not arbitrarily determined, Facebook is within its rights.

Misleading - Illegal, as the Supremes will affirm.

Discriminatory - Illegal, as the Supremes will affirm.

Fraudulent - As long as not arbitrarily determined, Facebook is within its rights.
Click to expand...

It is not unlawful, as you yourself have stated, even leftists have been kicked off. And they don't need to justify their choice of who gets banned, if you break the rules they have the right to kick you off.

And again, if it is not unlawful (no reason it would be) it is also not illegal. Especially as they are not there to provide free speech to every idiot on the internet.

You stated both left wing and right wing got banned, so there is no discrimination you can prove and even if it was. There is no expectation of being free to speak your mind in a manner that breaks the rules of FB. They violated their agreement and got canned. Not illegal, not discriminatory and certainly not fraudulent. You have got no evidence, no logical position and you just keep failed responses alive by repeating them again and again. And they were nonsense when you posted them the first time and wrong again now.

Facebook is not mandated to provide free speech to anyone.
 
3leftsdoo said:
Free speech is evil; its exercise must be targeted for removal if even one listener is offended.

Incorrect. Both right and left are being silenced. Irrelevant. Good to know; some REALLY love Big Brother!
Click to expand...

Lol you consider Facebook big brother, what complete nonsense your comments are.
 
3leftsdoo said:
Indeed. Not at all. Nonsense, and some might say that endlessly asking the same already answered questions borders on trolling. :)
Click to expand...
:) if you had ever answered the question, maybe. Since you didn't, your continued refusal to do so acts only as an admission of your implicit acceptance of your defeat :)

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
 
Peter King said:
And another non-answers with nothing but platitudes and mindlessly simple "incorrect" responses. You have not proved one time what Facebook is doing is illegal (FYI, they are not) and that it will be addressed by the Supreme court (they have better things to do than help petty right wing hate posters who were stupid enough to get banned by FB).
Click to expand...

All addressed. :)
 
Peter King said:
It is not unlawful, as you yourself have stated, even leftists have been kicked off. And they don't need to justify their choice of who gets banned, if you break the rules they have the right to kick you off.

And again, if it is not unlawful (no reason it would be) it is also not illegal. Especially as they are not there to provide free speech to every idiot on the internet.

You stated both left wing and right wing got banned, so there is no discrimination you can prove and even if it was. There is no expectation of being free to speak your mind in a manner that breaks the rules of FB. They violated their agreement and got canned. Not illegal, not discriminatory and certainly not fraudulent. You have got no evidence, no logical position and you just keep failed responses alive by repeating them again and again. And they were nonsense when you posted them the first time and wrong again now.

Facebook is not mandated to provide free speech to anyone.
Click to expand...

Incorrect.

Makes no sense.

Arbitrary silencing of speech = unconstitutional. Incorrect. Possibly; yes. Incorrect; incorrect; correct. Incorrect. Nonsense.

Incorrect.
 
cpwill said:
:) if you had ever answered the question, maybe. Since you didn't, your continued refusal to do so acts only as an admission of your implicit acceptance of your defeat :)

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Questions answered multiple times. :) Utter nonsense. :)
 
3leftsdoo said:
Questions answered multiple times. :) Utter nonsense. :)
Click to expand...
I've already accepted your admission of defeat, man. Continuing to self-pwn by insisting that mythical posts which do not exist and which you cannot cite, summarize, nor link to should save you is humorus for the rest of us, but only makes you look dumber.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
 
3leftsdoo said:
Incorrect.

Makes no sense.

Arbitrary silencing of speech = unconstitutional. Incorrect. Possibly; yes. Incorrect; incorrect; correct. Incorrect. Nonsense.

Incorrect.
Click to expand...

Another non-response I see. Still no evidence, no cogent argument actually. Your posts are nothing but incorrectly stating incorrect.
 
Dittohead not! said:
Oh, I see.

Well, there is no material difference between DP and Facebook. One is bigger than the other, but both are platforms for people to cuss and discuss what's important to them.

So, he can't demonstrate said difference.
Click to expand...

There is no real difference. Facebook doesn't hold a monopoly on social media nor does it hold all access to the internet. It's a private system with a TOS, they don't have to "honor free speech". It is odd that they cannot address why somehow Facebook has to "honor free speech" but a place like DP doesn't.
 
Ikari said:
There is no real difference. Facebook doesn't hold a monopoly on social media nor does it hold all access to the internet. It's a private system with a TOS, they don't have to "honor free speech". It is odd that they cannot address why somehow Facebook has to "honor free speech" but a place like DP doesn't.
Click to expand...

Not so odd, really. It's difficult to acknowledge being wrong. It's lot's easier to keep repeating things like "incorrect," "makes no sense," or "already addressed."
 
Dittohead not! said:
Not so odd, really. It's difficult to acknowledge being wrong. It's lot's easier to keep repeating things like "incorrect," "makes no sense," or "already addressed."
Click to expand...

Yep, just stick to your assertion and declare it to be case closed.

 
cpwill said:
I've already accepted your admission of defeat, man. Continuing to self-pwn by insisting that mythical posts which do not exist and which you cannot cite, summarize, nor link to should save you is humorus for the rest of us, but only makes you look dumber.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Complete nonsense.
 
Ikari said:
There is no real difference. Facebook doesn't hold a monopoly on social media nor does it hold all access to the internet. It's a private system with a TOS, they don't have to "honor free speech". It is odd that they cannot address why somehow Facebook has to "honor free speech" but a place like DP doesn't.
Click to expand...

Addressed ad nauseam.
 
Dittohead not! said:
Not so odd, really. It's difficult to acknowledge being wrong. It's lot's easier to keep repeating things like "incorrect," "makes no sense," or "already addressed."
Click to expand...

This thread may be undead.

It now solely consists of the rote repetition of claims that issues repeatedly addressed have not been, and droning ad hom.

:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom