Although it's not "net neutrality" in and of itself because it's a platform and not an isp, Facebook exercises on a platform level what you can expect on a provider level. On Facebook, the extent to which you are able to reach your followers is strangled, meaning you're only able to reach a tiny fraction of them at a time. This is a problem if you're using Facebook to reach your followers to promote your business. However, Facebook allows you to reach a greater (but not total) number of followers if you pay a fee. That's internet non-neutrality in practice, and that will be the model of the internet in the future.
Now, if you don't have a business website, you won't care about customers reaching you so you won't notice that. You will, however, very much notice when an internet connection has been slowed to a crawl for a website that didn't pay for the fast lane, and you'll likely grow bored or frustrated with that site and not return to it. And of course, that's assuming there isn't an entirely separate package for accessing that website in the first place.
View attachment 67225187