- Joined
- Sep 15, 2020
- Messages
- 7,541
- Reaction score
- 5,435
- Location
- ve, ver, vis, vis, verself
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
No, only shills believe what you believe.Its not the far left that believes that, it is the wild and crazy Trump cult.
He's a vegan who wants to ban chocolate milk. Seriously, how is this a conservative? He attacks people who oppose "Build Back Better."My plan includes: Building one digital platform for New Yorkers to access all City services Bringing the City to the community by delivering services in storefronts and in-person in lower-income neighborhoods Creating a Recovery Score to track our progress with analytics
A more equal city Finally, the City must do a far better job of maximizing its resources and using its regulatory powers to help deal with structural economic and social issues. That includes prioritizing spending on programs, services, and contractors that reduce inequality. It also means revisiting regulations that discourage growth, particularly of our Black and Brown owned small businesses.
My plan includes: Prioritizing minority- and women-owned businesses for City contracts Eliminating the fees for starting a small business Instituting a warning system for violations that do not pose immediate danger Maximizing the use of City assets — particularly office buildings for affordable housing
Economy
Our city is in serious economic trouble. The pandemic has cost us hundreds-of-thousands of jobs and billions of dollars in revenue.
And the deep hole we find ourselves in is not entirely due to COVID-19. Our economy was built on uneven ground: pervasive inequality, with just a few sectors accounting for most jobs, and vast wealth disparities. Before the pandemic, Latino and Black households in the city averaged approximately half the income that white households did.
Eric Adams Speaking Infront of Outdoor Dinning Area Our recovery starts with public health and public safety. But there are other things we can and must do immediately to save our economy. Some things will take years. Some things will take a generation. But we must get started now on all. Here’s how we bring back New York better than ever.
Step 1 - Protect what we have built and who built it Since the pandemic and its disastrous impact on this country’s economy, we have seen a significant downturn that is far worse than most American cities’. Estimates are that, even after the COVID crisis is somewhat under control, New York City will have half-a-million fewer jobs than before the pandemic. We have to right the ship, fast.
Step 2 - Create a stronger, deeper, fairer 21st Century economy New York City must position itself to lead in the industries of the future: the green economy, healthcare/biotech, digital technology and cybersecurity. Our workers were unprepared for this even before the pandemic. Invest in green infrastructure projects through a municipal bond program.
Step 3 - Create an equitable economy that gives everyone the opportunity to thrive Black and Brown communities were sidelined as the New York City economy flourished. For instance, the communities I grew up in — Brownsville and South Jamaica — continue to experience significant unemployment while massive development and economic expansion occurred in other parts of the city. Those communities have waited long enough — now we will build an inclusive economy for them that is equitable and enduring.
IOW, Constitutional rights = whites, only!New York City.
All one can do is to shake one's head -- and keep away from that horrible, horrible, horrible place.
It needs another Mayor Giuliani to clean it up.
But in 2022, the courts will not allow stop & frisk.
A shame!
In a crime-ridden neighborhood, how would cops know if someone is innocent of carrying guns unless they stopped them?Sounds like if they did better police work, they'd get better results. You know, like maybe investigating crimes, instead of stopping innocent people on the street?
Thank you for forcing me to google "IOW." (I am an 85-year-old computer illiterate.)IOW, Constitutional rights = whites, only!
In a crime-ridden neighborhood, how would cops know if someone is innocent of carrying guns unless they stopped them?
And what is wrong with collecting guns from 10 percent of the people they stop and search? That sounds like a good rate of return to me.
You feeling sorry for the people who lost their illegal firearms?
Making people on the streets aware (again in crime-ridden neighborhoods) they might be stopped at any time seems to me to be a good deterrent to carrying weapons. Just ask the scumbag thugs in South Chicago who engage in "mutual combat" on the streets without being arrested.
SO what is your problem with 'stop and frisk' in crime-ridden neighborhoods? You afraid more idiot thugs are to be restrained because they are carrying illegal weapons?
So 'thug' is some sort of trigger word for you. Like 'snowflake'?The usage of the word "thug" tells me all I need to know about you. You aren't worth my time.
Tata.
You must be a MSNC fan then lol.Really.
I know damned well his party affiliation. Your post only knows what nut job media tells you.
Real Trump stupid stuff.
So 'thug' is some sort of trigger word for you. Like 'snowflake'?
How about these synonyms below? They all describe the same kind of trash that make cities dangerous places in which to live. Pick one you like better if you are so offended.
You're not from South Chicago are you?
ruffian
hoodlum
bully boy
bully
bandit
mugger
gangster
terrorist
gunman
murderer
killer
hitman
assassin
hooligan
vandal
Yardie
tough
bruiser
hired gun
rough
bovver boy
lager lout
chav
hoodie
ned
hood
goon
roughie
hoon
cutthroat
desperado
myrmidon
It's tells me lots about what triggers you.Yet out of all those synonyms, you chose to use "thug."
Very telling.
He's not wrong.Eric Adams rips BLM, anti-cop activists after night of NYC shootings
Three people were killed and at least 13 others were wounded in a series of shootings that rocked parts of The Bronx and Brooklyn late Tuesday and early Wednesday.nypost.com
Uh oh, the libs arent gonna like him going off-script.
He didn't say BLM was the problem.He says, according to the article "that those who protest against police brutality should also acknowledge the scourge of gun violence." It goes on to give one quote: “The lives of these black children that are dying every night matter,” Adams said. “We can’t be hypocrites.”
On what evidence does he base his assertion that those protesting police brutality are not aware of the scourge of gun violence? It seems to me it is quite the opposite. On the other side we have those who are fine with police brutality and tolerate gun violence just fine - "the price we pay for freedom" they like to say.
He's just trying to change the subject. His billion dollar police budget and police constantly swarming the subways couldn't stop this shooting, but BLM is the problem.
He's not wrong.
Adams is eventually going to shame black leaders (including BLM terrorist leaders) in the city to get involved with the criminals, thugs, and drug dealers in the city (do you think they're all black?) to help curb the gun violence perpetrated by black criminals.He's not wrong.
BLM is not always the problem. The idea here is for BLM to be part of the solution to gangbanger shootings on the streets of NYC.He didn't say BLM was the problem.
Thank you for your thoughtful reply.
It is really an intractable problem.
Most violent crime in our large cities (such as here in Los Angeles) is committed by young gentlemen of two certain ethnicities. So stop & frisk is bound to catch in its grasp some or even many innocent young gentlemen.
You mentioned the 4th Amendment. Maybe that is why the Los Angeles Police Department has just ordered its officers to avoid stopping drivers unless they really have a good reason to do so.
Personally, I feel there is no way to really stop violent crime, which will no doubt get even worse in the coming decades as the country continues its inexorable population change, so people will just have to take their chances when they step outside.
Have a nice weekend!
He says, according to the article "that those who protest against police brutality should also acknowledge the scourge of gun violence." It goes on to give one quote: “The lives of these black children that are dying every night matter,” Adams said. “We can’t be hypocrites.”
On what evidence does he base his assertion that those protesting police brutality are not aware of the scourge of gun violence? It seems to me it is quite the opposite. On the other side we have those who are fine with police brutality and tolerate gun violence just fine - "the price we pay for freedom" they like to say.
He's just trying to change the subject. His billion dollar police budget and police constantly swarming the subways couldn't stop this shooting, but BLM is the problem.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?