• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Elon Musk's X changes its terms of service to steer user lawsuits towards a Texas court instead of California. Which is fine. Just happens to be a com

ColdHardTruth

ColdHardTruth

SN/YN US NAVY
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 6, 2022
Messages
26,028
Reaction score
23,068
Location
Colorado
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
Elon Musk changed X's terms of service to send all legal disputes to a court in Texas. This is called judge shopping, and it isn't legal. The judge who runs that court is a Telsa investor. The judge in question needs to be disbarred, indicted, and tried.

Musk needs to be fined into poverty for this injustice.


www.rollingstone.com

X Looks to Steer Lawsuits to Musk's Favorite Tesla-Investor Judge

X's updated Terms of Service stipulate that legal complaints against it must go through the right-wing Northern District of Texas
www.rollingstone.com www.rollingstone.com

 
ColdHardTruth said:
Elon Musk changed X's terms of service to send all legal disputes to a court in Texas. This is called judge shopping, and it isn't legal. The judge who runs that court is a Telsa investor. The judge in question needs to be disbarred, indicted, and tried.

Musk needs to be fined into poverty for this injustice.


www.rollingstone.com

X Looks to Steer Lawsuits to Musk's Favorite Tesla-Investor Judge

X's updated Terms of Service stipulate that legal complaints against it must go through the right-wing Northern District of Texas
www.rollingstone.com www.rollingstone.com

Click to expand...
I seem to remember that X moved from CA to TX more than a year ago.

Seems a no brainer that any court action would need to happen in TX now.
 
ColdHardTruth said:
Elon Musk changed X's terms of service to send all legal disputes to a court in Texas. This is called judge shopping, and it isn't legal. The judge who runs that court is a Telsa investor. The judge in question needs to be disbarred, indicted, and tried.

Musk needs to be fined into poverty for this injustice.


www.rollingstone.com

X Looks to Steer Lawsuits to Musk's Favorite Tesla-Investor Judge

X's updated Terms of Service stipulate that legal complaints against it must go through the right-wing Northern District of Texas
www.rollingstone.com www.rollingstone.com

Click to expand...

Needs to be denaturalized and sent back to Johannesburg.
 
Elon is busy using the government to earn him some munnnayyyy!
 
Musk is all-in for Trump, he’s flagrantly breaking our laws to tilt the scales, betting that Trump will be in office to save him from being thrown behind bars.

The only thing more shameful than these crooks are those who vote for em.
 
Jury of your peers. That's why TX is better than CA.
 
Absentglare said:
Musk is all-in for Trump, he’s flagrantly breaking our laws to tilt the scales, betting that Trump will be in office to save him from being thrown behind bars.

The only thing more shameful than these crooks are those who vote for em.
Click to expand...
Ginger Ale said:
Elon is busy using the government to earn him some munnnayyyy!
Click to expand...
Checkerboard Strangler said:
Needs to be denaturalized and sent back to Johannesburg.
Click to expand...
Happy to hear Musk is getting under the skin of hateful leftists!
 
Cosmo said:
Happy to hear Musk is getting under the skin of hateful leftists!
Click to expand...
Folks got arrested for offering water to those in line to vote while Musk is offering literally millions of dollars in cash.

MAGA seems to want leaders who are criminals that operate above the law. This is hard to understand until you realize that MAGA is not driven primarily by tangible policy goals, but primarily by hating other Americans.
 
eman623 said:
I'm thinking a $300 billion dollar fine for the perfectly legal act of changing X's TOS may be seen as excessive by some.
Click to expand...

Changing the TOS is fine. Steering cases to a judge that is a Tesla investor is not.

It's a conflict of interest and it needs to cost the judge his job and his law license. It needs to cost Musk his balls.
 
Cosmo said:
What law specifically is Musk breaking?
Click to expand...
He's judge shopping.

The judge he chose is a Tesla investor which means as a matter of ethics, that judge cannot hear cases involving ANYTHING Musk owns or has a business interest in.

Musk is attempting to fix cases filed against X so that they go to a court that is biased.

This behavior needs to cost Musk every last cent he has.
 
Absentglare said:
Folks got arrested for offering water to those in line to vote while Musk is offering literally millions of dollars in cash.

MAGA seems to want leaders who are criminals that operate above the law. This is hard to understand until you realize that MAGA is not driven primarily by tangible policy goals, but primarily by hating other Americans.
Click to expand...
ColdHardTruth said:
He's judge shopping.

The judge he chose is a Tesla investor which means as a matter of ethics, that judge cannot hear cases involving ANYTHING Musk owns or has a business interest in.

Musk is attempting to fix cases filed against X so that they go to a court that is biased.

This behavior needs to cost Musk every last cent he has.
Click to expand...
ColdHardTruth said:
Trolling isn't going to help.
Click to expand...

16 posts in and nobody can substantiate the very simple thesis of this entire thread, the basic claim made by OP on which this entire discussion is based:
ColdHardTruth said:
it isn't legal.
Click to expand...

Let's see if we can get it substantiated in under 100 posts:
Cosmo said:
What law specifically is Musk breaking?
Click to expand...

...or will it be yet another text version of:
1729634839752.webp
 
Cosmo said:
16 posts in and nobody can substantiate the very simple thesis of this entire thread, the basic claim made by OP on which this entire discussion is based:


Let's see if we can get it substantiated in under 100 posts:


...or will it be yet another text version of:
View attachment 67538983
Click to expand...

I already explained this to you.

The judge who runs the court Musk chose is a Tesla investor. He is conflicted out. It's an attempt at judge shopping.

Judge-shopping is a practice where multiple lawsuits asserting the same claim are filed in the hopes of having one assigned to a favorable judge1. It is considered an abuse of the court system.

A conflict of interest refers to an interest that disqualifies a judge1. A judicial or arbitral decision consists of taking a side in such a conflict, allowing one interest to prevail over another in a reasoned way2. The Code of Conduct for United States Judges provides guidelines for conflicts of interest.

Here is the judicial code of conduct for Texas.


Canon 4: Conducting the Judge's Extra-Judicial Activities to Minimize the Risk of Conflict with Judicial Obligations A. Extra-Judicial Activities in General. A judge shall conduct all of the judge's extrajudicial activities so that they do not:(1) cast reasonable doubt on the judge's capacity to act impartially as a judge; or (2) interfere with the proper performance of judicial duties
 
Deport his ass.

Goddamn criminal immigrant. South Africa isn't sending their best people.
 
ColdHardTruth said:
I already explained this to you.

The judge who runs the court Musk chose is a Tesla investor. He is conflicted out. It's an attempt at judge shopping.

Judge-shopping is a practice where multiple lawsuits asserting the same claim are filed in the hopes of having one assigned to a favorable judge1. It is considered an abuse of the court system.

A conflict of interest refers to an interest that disqualifies a judge1. A judicial or arbitral decision consists of taking a side in such a conflict, allowing one interest to prevail over another in a reasoned way2. The Code of Conduct for United States Judges provides guidelines for conflicts of interest.

Here is the judicial code of conduct for Texas.


Canon 4: Conducting the Judge's Extra-Judicial Activities to Minimize the Risk of Conflict with Judicial Obligations A. Extra-Judicial Activities in General. A judge shall conduct all of the judge's extrajudicial activities so that they do not:(1) cast reasonable doubt on the judge's capacity to act impartially as a judge; or (2) interfere with the proper performance of judicial duties
Click to expand...
You linked to a code of conduct, not a law.
 
Cosmo said:
You linked to a code of conduct, not a law.
Click to expand...

For the judge, that is the law.

The judge is conflicted. He CANNOT hear cases involving Musk or any of his companies because he is an investor.

This is called a conflict of interest.

It's also banned in federal courts.
 
Cosmo said:
Nice alternate reality you've crafted for yourself. So you just make this stuff up and then roll with it?
Click to expand...
Your denial changes nothing.

He's a federal judge and federal judges are not allowed to do what he did.

Trolling is not going to help you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom