• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Elections 2012! Tomorrow!

Well, to a LOT of us it feels like we are already in that abyss, perhaps you hadn't heard. And it wasn't the socialists who put us here.

When you think you are in the abyss already, I think you are lacking imagination. It can well go way, way deeper.

And no, it weren't just socialists who spent like drunken sailors. Conservatives did that too. But I was not talking about "socialists" or "conservatives" in general, but about Sarkozy and Hollande. And everything I read about Hollande suggests that he has no ideas whatsoever beyond spending money France doesn't have, or about spending Germany's money, as if there was no problem with debt.
 
Actually you are. You need a damn good reason not to allow banks and such into a country, especially if you are in the EU.
You don't have to ban them, just put up some sensible regulations.

To blame the markets is just childish. Most countries did not experience a financial meltdown. If the markets were the cause, then all countries should have collapsed. Maybe countries, such as Ireland may realize that increasing household debt with 120% of GDP in 10 years was not a good choice.

The problem is mismanagement. It is just silly to blame individuals or companies, if they did nothing illegal.
 
When you think you are in the abyss already, I think you are lacking imagination. It can well go way, way deeper.
You mean more than 24% unemployment, 45% youth unemployment, rampant fuel price inflation, swingeing public service cuts, even higher retirement ages, etc etc? Use your imagination and tell us how much worse it could be.
 
You mean more than 24% unemployment, 45% youth unemployment, rampant fuel price inflation, swingeing public service cuts, even higher retirement ages, etc etc? Use your imagination and tell us how much worse it could be.

I'll let you know when the first mass protestors set European cities on fire after pillaging. ;)

Seriously, though, yes, the situation is bad. I just don't see that spending money that isn't there is a solution.
 
I'll let you know when the first mass protestors set European cities on fire after pillaging.
Well, that might be the day that someone in charge will have to start doing something drastic to end corporatist capital's throat-grip on western society. That day is surely not that far away. And that is me being serious!
 
I'll let you know when the first mass protestors set European cities on fire after pillaging. ;)

They have in the UK..parts of major cities burned for days.. has not even happened in Greece!

Seriously, though, yes, the situation is bad. I just don't see that spending money that isn't there is a solution.

The money IS there that is the problem. The lies about the Spanish situation are so rampant that it is astonishing.

For example, only today on CNBC was a so called expert claiming the massive personal debt of the Spanish.. it is utterly lie and either he is uttering this lie because he is stupid and dont understand economics or he is trying to earn a quick buck in speculation.

Fact is that personal debt in the UK and US are far far far far higher than in Spain. The problem in Spain is the debt of the companies, mostly the building sector. However that is counted as "personal debt" in a lot of statistics and hence it inflates the numbers. Credit card debt in Spain is relative to most other major economies relative low .. and especially compared to the UK and US. Of course they are no Italians... who also have been under attack for "too much debt".. owed to themselves..

Another thing is the supposed massive Spanish public debt.. it is still lower than Germany's and France and far lower than the US and UK. Funny that the country with the lowest debt ratio and falling deficit is under threat but countries with higher debt and no control over the deficit are having money thrown at them..

So under any normal banking situation Spain should be a much better risk than most other countries since its debt is relatively not that high.. but nope not in this Anglo-American financial world.

Like it or not, the building boom in Spain was fuelled by non Spanish buying holiday homes, and hence pricing out the average Spaniard. Hell I know quite a few late 30s and early 40s that still live with their parents because housing prices and rents have been too high. It is a very common problem in Spain. It is also something most so called "experts" never mention or I suspect, know about. They just expect that all the building and selling happened to domestic audiences like in Ireland, the US and UK.. nope!

But in the end, it is all the doom and gloom talk that is hurting everyone.. along with the lies and glossing over certain countries situations /wave Ireland.
 
You mean more than 24% unemployment, 45% youth unemployment, rampant fuel price inflation, swingeing public service cuts, even higher retirement ages, etc etc? Use your imagination and tell us how much worse it could be.

Yea but how much of the 24% is actual unemployment ... you know what I mean :)
 
You mean more than 24% unemployment, 45% youth unemployment, rampant fuel price inflation, swingeing public service cuts, even higher retirement ages, etc etc? Use your imagination and tell us how much worse it could be.

Sure.
1. Unemployed in Spain get an average benefit of 10000 euros per year. What if only 20% can get formal employment. And the rest get no unemployment benefits.
2. People in Spain receive health care and medicines. What if you couldn't?
3. Spain has an active police force, what if no one would help you?
4. Only 300K household in Spain have no income or benefits, most of them probably live on saved up money. There are 1.5 million households with no income. What if none of them received any benefits? What if there was no retirement benefits?
5. What if wages were 1/10 of what they are now?

You have no idea how lucky you are, being born in a developed country. What I just described is an average African country. Things can get a lot worse.
 
T
Like it or not, the building boom in Spain was fuelled by non Spanish buying holiday homes, and hence pricing out the average Spaniard. Hell I know quite a few late 30s and early 40s that still live with their parents because housing prices and rents have been too high. It is a very common problem in Spain. It is also something most so called "experts" never mention or I suspect, know about. They just expect that all the building and selling happened to domestic audiences like in Ireland, the US and UK.. nope!

But in the end, it is all the doom and gloom talk that is hurting everyone.. along with the lies and glossing over certain countries situations /wave Ireland.

Only about a million people have a holiday home in Spain. That is not the reason property prices increased.

I saw what was happening in Spain, it was crazy. They just kept on building, far into the countryside, and just assumed more and more people would move to Spanish coast. The new construction did not decrease costs, because people didn't want to live there. In fact it probably increased housing costs. If the government had a problem with high housing costs, then public housing will solve that problem. Let the government build middle class apartments, and let any Spanish person who is not rich buy them.

What really increased costs was the credit-boom of companies, households and financial institution's. More money in the market means higher housing prices.
 
Only about a million people have a holiday home in Spain. That is not the reason property prices increased.

LOL the hell it was. House prices in my area, rose and rose because Swedes, Germans, Fins, Danes and especially Brits demanded holiday homes in the sun. I have owned this house since 1978 and lets just say... the prices around here are crazy compared to then, and it is full of non Spanish. My direct neighbours are Dutch with a bunch of Brits and Swedes in and a few Spanish.

I saw what was happening in Spain, it was crazy. They just kept on building, far into the countryside, and just assumed more and more people would move to Spanish coast. The new construction did not decrease costs, because people didn't want to live there. In fact it probably increased housing costs.

Sorry but you dont seem to understand a thing about what happened. Yes some building companies built whole cities near Madrid and other major cities inland in the hope that non Spanish would buy these homes or even the Spanish themselves.. it never happened because the non-Spanish did not want to live there and the Spanish could not afford them.. and it is especially those homes that are a problem today. Hell they even built an international airport that can handle the airbus jumbo.. near a town of 50k in the middle of Spain .. that of course was an utter failure and a few billion out the window.

Now on the coast it is a whole other ball game. Here it was Germans, Brits, Danes and so on that drove up prices and drove the massive building on the Costa Del Sol and similar places. Did the Spanish themselves participate.. sure, because the better off from Madrid and up north also want a holiday home in the sun.. but a huge portion of the price rises was due to demand from non Spanish. Hell we have whole enclaves of Fins, Swedes, Danes, and whole freaking towns of British on both sides of Malaga all the way to Gibraltar. Estepona for example is a British haven.. well was, since many Brits dont have the money any more and are heading home. And even to this day, prices in a certain stretch of the coast still have rising prices and it is all fuelled by foreign demand.

If the government had a problem with high housing costs, then public housing will solve that problem. Let the government build middle class apartments, and let any Spanish person who is not rich buy them.

I think that is the solution for the big ghost cities that is for sure. One thing for sure, we dont need more building in Spain (on a mass scale).. at least for a while.

What really increased costs was the credit-boom of companies, households and financial institution's. More money in the market means higher housing prices.

Of course cheap credit was a driver also, but demand was the biggest driver, and that demand came from non Spanish in the sunny areas of Spain. Problem was that the northern areas, Madrid and such, also wanted in on the building boom and hoped people would want holiday homes there.. well there are no beaches in Madrid..

And I do know of the statistics that state that 80% home ownership in Spain.. it is simply not something that I see in my daily life. Most young people (under 40) live in rented homes or at home with their parents. I wonder if the statistics include homes owned by building companies.. which is a huge number and are skewing the figures..

For one.. if there was such a higher home ownership in Spain then with 25% unemployment I would expect to see a massive amount of delinquencies and evictions.. you know like in the US.. but last I looked it was no where near the US numbers.

And that is backed up by other statistics that state that while housing prices went up nutso like, the real wage of the average Spaniard did not, hence most could not afford the new homes. So why did the housing prices go up... there must have been some sort of demand .. oh yea from Brits and Germans.

As for your "only 1 million" homes sold to non Spanish... hog wash. There is alone 250 to 350k Brits living in Spain, add to that all the other nationalities, and the add to those who (like me at first) bought a summer house... that is WAY over 1 million. And that is only estimates... there are official estimates here on the Costa Del Sol based on water and electricity consumption that the registered inhabitants is between 20 to 40% under what the actual number is.. depending on the season.
 
Anyway, it seems like LePen isn't going to move her support to Sarkozy but Menchelon is happy to get behind Hollande. Looks to be in the bag for Hollande. Looks like stock markets wobbled a bit after these results, thouh its unclear whether it was the surprising good performance of the far right or a near certain Hollande victory was the cause.

This might be a long term boon for the National Front. By refusing to compromise or coalesce with their nearest ideological compatriots, they avoid being associated with the further pain the French economy is likely to face over the next few years. Menchelon will be muddied by association with Hollande's government.
 
LOL the hell it was. House prices in my area, rose and rose because Swedes, Germans, Fins, Danes and especially Brits demanded holiday homes in the sun. I have owned this house since 1978 and lets just say... the prices around here are crazy compared to then, and it is full of non Spanish. My direct neighbours are Dutch with a bunch of Brits and Swedes in and a few Spanish.
Oh.. come on, you live in Costa Del Sol. If only foreigners are to blame, then only Costa Del Sol should experience a housing boom..

But you pretty much refuted your own argument. You said, they build huge ghost cities outside Madrid. I never been to Madrid, but one thing I know. It is not a dream of foreigners to live in Madrid. So why did they construct so many houses? because there was a building boom based on cheap credit.

And yes, the number is correct. While there are 250-350K british people in Spain. They do not have 250-350K homes. The number of houses according to this source is 1.5 million Ciudadanos Europeos I would assume no more than 1 million were built the last decade. That is not going to massively increase house prices all over Spain.

You ask about why home ownership is 80%. I can tell you why it is so high. It is because of rent control and the difficulty of evicting tenants, which limits the amount of properties for rent. When they say 80% home ownership, they mean 20% rent their property. There is no way to classify if a person living with his parents wants to live with his parents.


Sorry but you dont seem to understand a thing about what happened.
Then why do you confirm my arguments? The fact that the irresponsible building boom was not exclusive to Costa Del Sol, proves my argument that easy credit was the cause. And you agree with my solution, to build public housing and sell them to any Spanish person who is not rich. If they combined this with limits on credit to households and corporations, and removed their dumb rent laws. Then property prices would decline, it would be easier to find a cheap place to rent and the building boom would have been limited. Hence, unemployment would not be 25%.
 
Anyway, it seems like LePen isn't going to move her support to Sarkozy

Thats because Sarkozy is so unpopular..

but Menchelon is happy to get behind Hollande. Looks to be in the bag for Hollande.

Hardly... Sarkozy can easily win still.. 2 weeks can change everything.

Looks like stock markets wobbled a bit after these results thouh its unclear whether it was the surprising good performance of the far right or a near certain Hollande victory was the cause.

Nope that was because of bad economic news, not these elections.



This might be a long term boon for the National Front. By refusing to compromise or coalesce with their nearest ideological compatriots, they avoid being associated with the further pain the French economy is likely to face over the next few years. Menchelon will be muddied by association with Hollande's government.
 
So unpopular? But he can still win in two weeks? Which is it? If he can't get the nf vote he's toast.
 
Oh.. come on, you live in Costa Del Sol. If only foreigners are to blame, then only Costa Del Sol should experience a housing boom..

But you pretty much refuted your own argument. You said, they build huge ghost cities outside Madrid. I never been to Madrid, but one thing I know. It is not a dream of foreigners to live in Madrid. So why did they construct so many houses? because there was a building boom based on cheap credit.

The hell I did. The cheap credit did fuel the boom, I have never denied that, but there would have never been a boom if there was no demand.. and that demand was in large part because of non-Spanish. Now that the building companies got greedy and deluded to think that Germans would want to live inland some where does not mean that one of the main drivers of prices across the country was Brits and Germans and so on.

And yes, the number is correct. While there are 250-350K british people in Spain. They do not have 250-350K homes. The number of houses according to this source is 1.5 million Ciudadanos Europeos I would assume no more than 1 million were built the last decade. That is not going to massively increase house prices all over Spain.

Seriously.. is that your source? So 1.6 million homes owned by non Spanish, plus how many millions owned by tourism companies to rent out during the tourism season? You do realize that Spain is the second biggest tourist destination after France on the planet right? 30 million people visit Spain each year, and 10 million of those approx on the Costa del Sol. You can not tell me that an industry that caters for 30% of GDP (tourism) does not impact prices on housing and other goods. We have whole complexes here owned by management complexes that rent out to tourists... and there is a lot of those.

Sadly there are very few reliable statistics on foreign home ownership in Spain.

You ask about why home ownership is 80%. I can tell you why it is so high. It is because of rent control and the difficulty of evicting tenants, which limits the amount of properties for rent. When they say 80% home ownership, they mean 20% rent their property. There is no way to classify if a person living with his parents wants to live with his parents.

LOL....Even your own so called source states that 80% number is for older people and the number falls the younger you get. As for evicting tenants.. yea it is not easy, but it aint easy in any country... you need to do your legal work.

Then why do you confirm my arguments? The fact that the irresponsible building boom was not exclusive to Costa Del Sol, proves my argument that easy credit was the cause.

Never said it did not have a factor.. but cheap credit or not, the building companies would not build unless there was some sort of demand. And at those prices it did not come from the locals and that only leaves foreigners and the tourism industry. Had there not been the external factor, then the demand would have been "natural" and not created any where near the boom that was created.. because the buyers had limited funds. Now the Brits and Germans did not have limited funds (relatively) and wanted homes.. and that drove up prices because there was demand.

And you agree with my solution, to build public housing and sell them to any Spanish person who is not rich.

Not BUILD, but nationalise.. they have a 1 million homes rotting, so why the hell build more? It is not like they are in the middle of no where these homes, they are just not priced correctly for Spaniards and are unattractive for northern European holiday goers.

If they combined this with limits on credit to households and corporations,

LOL you dont listen... the main Spanish banks are healthy and have been through out the crisis. That is because they did in fact limit lending relatively to non Spanish banks. It was Barcleys and co that gave out 110% mortgages (and STILL do lol)... Where the banks, especially the CAJAs went wrong, was to the corporations. Nepotism and local corruption fed these companies with cheap credit, and that has killed off quite a few CAJAs and forced them to merge. But they still only account for a small % the total banking industry.

and removed their dumb rent laws.

Oh you mean the rent control on some buildings? Sure, but that wont do jack**** for the market. Rent prices have fallen a lot the last 5 years. Spain is an example of the free market going nuts.. there was not controls and regulation which in turn meant prices could be pressed up easily. No one asked questions when permits were given out, or people just built without.. and no one asked questions when Russians and motorcycle gangs and the like came and bought up masses of land and houses with northern European and Eastern European prostitution, drug and gun money.

Then property prices would decline, it would be easier to find a cheap place to rent and the building boom would have been limited.

Property prices have been declining.. but there is still demand for homes in the sun. Now the areas where prices have fallen the most are areas where there is no one from abroad that want to live...The problem is that the building companies and banks are sitting on a ton of homes and waiting for better prices that will never come. If they release them on the market, then the prices will drop dramatically.. but the building companies refuse to do that as long as the government keeps them solvent. The banks have written off most of the bad debt any ways.

Hence, unemployment would not be 25%.

Spanish unemployment has always been high even during the boom times. Fraud is considerable. Hence the 25%.. well 23.6%, is an inflated number.

But also, one thing that many forget... debt follows you, so you might get evicted from your home, and the home sold, but you still owe the money. That is VERY different than in most countries, including the US where you can basically walk away from debt. It is something they have to address here.

Any ways I tire of this and need food.. we cant agree, so lets agree to disagree on most points until we can find reliable statistics.
 
So unpopular? But he can still win in two weeks? Which is it? If he can't get the nf vote he's toast.

He is unpopular but he can still win... depends on how the next 2 weeks go. 2 weeks in politics is a long time.. ask Rick Perry.

That Le Pen did not support him, does not mean that her supporters wont vote for him to prevent the left for taking over. It is nothing but damage control by Le Pen... it is like how Bush was persona non grata among most Republicans in the run up to the 2008 elections.. they distanced themselves but they could not change their political leaning and the last 8 years of history. Same is with Sarkozy... Le Pen has far more in common with Sarkozy than with the left, but cant be seen to favour him because of how unpopular he is.. it might effect elections across the country that come later in the year.

So if Sarkozy looses then they can say we did not support him, and if he wins then they also can say we did not support him... even though they did :)
 
In terms of economic policy lepen has little in common with sarkozy. She wants to increase the scope of the civil service, engage in protectionism and isolate France from Europe.

Lepen dislikes NATO and antlanticism.

Foreign policy is not shared, lepen has way more of a hard on for the francophonie.

Immigration attitudes are somewhat shared. I don't think we'll see much cross-over. Don't really see how sark getting 1% less than Hollande makes him so unpopular that lepen wouldn't support him if they were ideologically aligned
 
In terms of economic policy lepen has little in common with sarkozy. She wants to increase the scope of the civil service, engage in protectionism and isolate France from Europe.

Lepen dislikes NATO and antlanticism.

What.. Le Pen has policies on other than immigration? :)

Immigration attitudes are somewhat shared. I don't think we'll see much cross-over. Don't really see how sark getting 1% less than Hollande makes him so unpopular that lepen wouldn't support him if they were ideologically aligned

And that is where Sarkozy has his chance.. immigration is key for voters of Le Pen and if Sarkozy goes nuts on immigration then he stands a chance. Sadly that is what most right wing parties are doing these days across Europe when they are under pressure.
 
And that is where Sarkozy has his chance.. immigration is key for voters of Le Pen and if Sarkozy goes nuts on immigration then he stands a chance. Sadly that is what most right wing parties are doing these days across Europe when they are under pressure.

That may be so but 'immigration' (rightly/wrongly) is on the mind of many parts of the electorate across Europe. This has been due to the wholly inadequate non-existent debate by most mainstream party's. The UK one of the worse offenders for not addressing the issues correctly.

Paul
 
What.. Le Pen has policies on other than immigration? :)

Sure they do. Nationalists by definition oppose globalism (from international corporations to financial institutions to immigration to pro-active foreign policy). They're as far away from the Reagonthatcheromics style right-wing you identified earlier as well as the neo-liberalism of Blair and Sarkozy you can imagine. I don't think 15% of French people are voting on racism alone.

How they intend to order their societies once they close themselves off from the outside world if given the chance is another question. They will be quite different. For instance, the BNP would attempt to promote the Christian nature of Britain whereas the NF would attempt to promote the secular identity of France. It would depend on how each modern nation was initially founded. Sinn Fein, a nationalist party in Ireland which is one of the rare instances it is not described as far right (while still sharing a similar anti-globalist outlook as the others) simply wouldn't get on with a BNP led UK.
 
Oh.. come on, you live in Costa Del Sol. If only foreigners are to blame, then only Costa Del Sol should experience a housing boom..

But you pretty much refuted your own argument. You said, they build huge ghost cities outside Madrid. I never been to Madrid, but one thing I know. It is not a dream of foreigners to live in Madrid. So why did they construct so many houses? because there was a building boom based on cheap credit.

And yes, the number is correct. While there are 250-350K british people in Spain. They do not have 250-350K homes. The number of houses according to this source is 1.5 million Ciudadanos Europeos I would assume no more than 1 million were built the last decade. That is not going to massively increase house prices all over Spain.

You ask about why home ownership is 80%. I can tell you why it is so high. It is because of rent control and the difficulty of evicting tenants, which limits the amount of properties for rent. When they say 80% home ownership, they mean 20% rent their property. There is no way to classify if a person living with his parents wants to live with his parents.



Then why do you confirm my arguments? The fact that the irresponsible building boom was not exclusive to Costa Del Sol, proves my argument that easy credit was the cause. And you agree with my solution, to build public housing and sell them to any Spanish person who is not rich. If they combined this with limits on credit to households and corporations, and removed their dumb rent laws. Then property prices would decline, it would be easier to find a cheap place to rent and the building boom would have been limited. Hence, unemployment would not be 25%.

You make a few good points. The housing boom was not solely driven by foreigners seeking second or retirement homes, as your point about the development around Madrid is correct. You are wrong that it was driven by easy consumer credit however. Getting credit in Spain, especially getting a mortgage, has always been much more difficult than in many other European countries and the US. The 100%+ mortgage never existed here. Nowadays getting a mortgage is virtually impossible for anyone but the very wealthy.

The housing boom was driven by very lax building regulations and highly corrupt practices between developers and planning authorities. The majority of the municipal corruption cases that are ongoing relate to bribery, malfeasance and influence peddling between construction developers and local politicians. Developers were building speculative urbanisations funded through massive loans from investment bankers and playing fast-and-loose with zoning and planning regulations. There's a very good example not far from me with the Algarrobico hotel. Despite the Law of the Coast being clear that such a development is illegal, the local authorities in Almería turned a blind eye for years until the regional government acted on the protests of local opponents.

The high levels of home ownership in Spain is not a result of easy access to consumer credit, but a historic situation due to the absence of any social housing. Municipal housing is virtually unheard of in most of Spain. People live in the family home far longer than in most countries and they build their own houses, often over a period of years, bit-by-bit, as and when they can afford to and usually without resorting to bank loans.

I don't understand your point about rent controls. I'm not aware of any such legislation. Perhaps you can show me some links to them. There is an issue about the difficulty of evicting tenants who either fail to pay rent or who contravene their lease terms. That does make some people wary of renting out property long-term. There has to be a balance between owners' rights and tenants' rights. Back in the days of Franco a tenant could be evicted on the flimsiest of pretexts and had no legal protection. Current legislation seems to have swung the pendulum too far in the opposite direction.
 
Last edited:
You are wrong that it was driven by easy consumer credit however. Getting credit in Spain, especially getting a mortgage, has always been much more difficult than in many other European countries and the US. The 100%+ mortgage never existed here. Nowadays getting a mortgage is virtually impossible for anyone but the very wealthy.
You are right, but I am not talking about individuals. I am talking about corporations. Corporations were living on easy credit. And they were driving property prices higher.

Rent control in Spain is moderate. But it becomes pretty terrible when it is very difficult to evict a tenant. You will agree on a price with the tenant, but then during the next 5 years you are only allowed to increase prices according to CPI. That means increasing the price with only 1-3% per year. Property taxes for an apartment depends on the value. So if you buy an apartment for 100K euros, rent it out for 150 euros a week in 2000. Then you pay 20 euros a week. In 5 years, the property has doubled in value. So the property taxes are now 40 euros a week. But according to consumer price index you can only rent it out for 170 euros a week.

The trouble of evicting tenants is the major problem, but the rent control makes it worse.
http://www.globalpropertyguide.com/Europe/Spain/Landlord-and-Tenant

Exane+Corporate+debt+as+percentage+of+GDP+22-03-12.jpg
 
Last edited:
You make a few good points. The housing boom was not solely driven by foreigners seeking second or retirement homes, as your point about the development around Madrid is correct. You are wrong that it was driven by easy consumer credit however. Getting credit in Spain, especially getting a mortgage, has always been much more difficult than in many other European countries and the US. The 100%+ mortgage never existed here. Nowadays getting a mortgage is virtually impossible for anyone but the very wealthy.

Yes I know and that is what I have been saying. But it was easy for non Spaniards.. Barcleys had and still have 110% mortgages in my area.

The high levels of home ownership in Spain is not a result of easy access to consumer credit, but a historic situation due to the absence of any social housing. Municipal housing is virtually unheard of in most of Spain. People live in the family home far longer than in most countries and they build their own houses, often over a period of years, bit-by-bit, as and when they can afford to and usually without resorting to bank loans.

Ahh yes of course, that would explain my experience.

I don't understand your point about rent controls. I'm not aware of any such legislation. Perhaps you can show me some links to them. There is an issue about the difficulty of evicting tenants who either fail to pay rent or who contravene their lease terms. That does make some people wary of renting out property long-term. There has to be a balance between owners' rights and tenants' rights. Back in the days of Franco a tenant could be evicted on the flimsiest of pretexts and had no legal protection. Current legislation seems to have swung the pendulum too far in the opposite direction.

Under Franco there was a limit on foreign ownership of land, which lead to some rather interesting methods of avoiding those rules. My old neighbour, a Dutch woman married originally to an American, owned the farm next to our home.. We bought our finca from her.. her day labours use to live in the home and she kicked them out hehe.. Any ways, we never understood why she wanted to sell and we later found out it was because she owed taxes. She later sold a bit of land extra to pay taxes.. When she died we found out that she actually owned a huge portion of the area (many square KM), and had done so by buying the land in her kids, grandkids and so on names.. so technically she only owned what she legally could and the rest was owned by her family members.. in reality it was her who was farming the land though. We also found out she had 10+ million on a bank account in the US.. which is ironic considering her tax problems. She was also some sort of noble.. but that is another story.
 
Last edited:
You are right, but I am not talking about individuals. I am talking about corporations. Corporations were living on easy credit. And they were driving property prices higher.

Rent control in Spain is moderate. But it becomes pretty terrible when it is very difficult to evict a tenant. You will agree on a price with the tenant, but then during the next 5 years you are only allowed to increase prices according to CPI. That means increasing the price with only 1-3% per year. Property taxes for an apartment depends on the value. So if you buy an apartment for 100K euros, rent it out for 150 euros a week in 2000. Then you pay 20 euros a week. In 5 years, the property has doubled in value. So the property taxes are now 40 euros a week. But according to consumer price index you can only rent it out for 170 euros a week.

The trouble of evicting tenants is the major problem, but the rent control makes it worse.
Property Law in Spain | Real Estate Laws

View attachment 67126461

FFS then we are pretty much in agreement.... That is exactly what I was trying to say at least. The whole statistical issue between corporations in the personal debt numbers.. oh well.

25 degrees here, and sun.. the reason people move here :)
 
Back
Top Bottom