but not answers. Cowardly evasions.
Your opinion is pathetic.
What you are saying is that you are being a coward every time you fail to answer a question. Correct?
That position is absurdly idiotic regardless of to whom it is applied.
Even though my replies were on topic, no one has to answer any question. Period.
Not answering specific questions has not a damn thing to do with cowardness. But your thoughts are so stupid you do not understand that.
Yes, of course I did. Citations and all.
Wrong as usual and not even paying attention to the argument made.
As previously pointed out, you posted reports with the false claim you were arguing. That is not "proving" anything but a a lack of logical thinking on your part. Had you bother to inform yourself of the topic you chose to engage in you would have known you were wrong from the get. As it was an order to facilitate release not an order to facilitate return. And even though you didn't know what you were talking about you chose to argue anyways.
On what world does providing links to reports with they same false information you are arguing prove that what you are arguing correct?
It doesn't. No such world exists.
If you could have refuted the facts you would have.
You did not argue a fact. You made a claim that you could not and still can not prove is true, and as already pointed out, if you read the order of the Court you will find your assertion to be false.
That is a lie on your part. Figures. It also clearly shows you do not know what running away actually is.
Interesting. You are the one with the initial claim. That is on you to prove. Not on me to disprove it. And as I suggested you should get what the Court actually said. But of course you didn't. You returned with false reports.
Maybe next time you will listen when someone is telling you that your argument is wrong and that the reports you provided are false.
Or maybe think there was a reason that the person is telling you to get what the Court actually said. But, noooooooo, not you.
You just can't listen to good advice or accurate information.
Regardless. I told you shortly after the person provided the information that it had been provided. All you had to do was look a few posts back to find it. But noooooo, not you, so confident in your own idiotic arguments. iLOL
That is on you for not searching it out then when I told you it had been posted.
You posted no such thing and will run away and evade again instead of answering.
Yep, you clearly also do not know what running away is. And your failing to read all that has been posted is not on me, but is your failure.
Heck, I have even provided a link to the actual SCOTUS order in this thread. Which just shows you do not know what you are talking about or bother reading all that has come before. That too is all on you and no one else.
SCOTUS' order was to facilitate release, not to facilitate return. Have you got that yet?
Are you going to apologize to everyone for making such a bone headed argument
after you were informed it was wrong?
