- Joined
- Jul 29, 2009
- Messages
- 34,478
- Reaction score
- 17,282
- Location
- Southwestern U.S.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Just another day at the office for MSNBC and their #1 liberal hate monger.
[/B]| RealClearPoliticsschultz_hatred_for_americas_first_black_president_not_a_reason_to_oppose_syria_attack_.html]Schultz: Hatred For Our First Black President Not A Reason To Oppose Syria Attack
Just another day at the office for MSNBC and their #1 liberal hate monger.
Schultz: Hatred For Our First Black President Not A Reason To Oppose Syria Attack | RealClearPolitics
I see what you are trying to do here Grim 17 and I have something to say about it.
To wit:
I am not a person who automatically agrees with anything that anyone, including Ed Schultz, says about anything.
But I do believe that Mr Schultz makes a valid point here.
There are plenty of valid reasons to oppose a U.S. Military attack on Syria.
Anyone who is opposed to it because they 'think' that shutting it down will hurt the 1st Black American elected to the office of President of the USA has more problems than I have time to talk about here, but, unfortunately, there are plenty of people on the far right in the USA who have those problems and the U.S. Congress voting against an attack on Syria will not make those problems go away.
The only way to eliminate those problems that I know of is a one way trip to a graveyard for those who have them.
I'll just add that I noticed some time ago that some losers on the right will use any chance that they find to try to slam Obama and anyone associated with him. I've also noticed that Obama is still in the White House and it is very likely that he will be there until another Democrat takes his place in 2017, whether anyone on the right likes it or not.
I'll also add that ignoring racism has never made it go away, it must be attacked every time that it raises it's ugly head.
I could say a lot more but I'll just leave it at that for now.
If anything that I have said here hurts anyone's 'feelings', well, that's just tough-deal with it. I have no sympathy whatsoever for you.
"At the heart of racism is the religious assertion that God made a creative mistake when He brought some people into being." ~ Friedrich Otto Hertz
With me? In a very special place of disdain.If Ed Schultz is the #1 Liberal hate-monger, where does Glenn Beck sit on the list of far-right hate-mongers?
Of course they do, but didn't I just read you doing a pretty good attempt at justifying Schultz' statements?Every political group in the USA has its own hate-mongers. Anyone who is surprised by this knows very little about politics on this planet.
So now the entire GOP is out of touch and running out of time. Nice..."Better days are coming." ~ But not for today's out of touch, running out of time, GOP.
I see what you are trying to do here Grim 17 and I have something to say about it.
To wit:
I am not a person who automatically agrees with anything that anyone, including Ed Schultz, says about anything.
But I do believe that Mr Schultz makes a valid point here.
[snip...]
With me? In a very special place of disdain.
Of course they do, but didn't I just read you doing a pretty good attempt at justifying Schultz' statements?
So now the entire GOP is out of touch and running out of time. Nice...
With me? In a very special place of disdain.
Of course they do, butdidn't I just read you doing a pretty good attempt at justifying Schultz' statements?
So now the entire GOP is out of touch and running out of time. Nice...
Mr. Shultz's points were totally unconnected as he stated two (main?) things 1) racial hate is a motive alleged to apply to those here (but somehow only in the GOP) that oppose Obama's (evolving?) Syria adventure plans, yet the reason that "the world" opposes the Obama Syria adventure is because of what the Bush administration did in Iraq.
Mr Schultz opposes this "mini war" nonsense but not based on either of those reasons. In essence Mr. Schultz has decided that he alone knows what is in the hearts of others, and naturally only the hearts of those in the "far right" among the GOP are racist to oppose this planned "mini war".
Mr. Schultz wants Obama to start the war (that he personally opposes) but by allowing those demorats in the house (which he agrees with) to vote no becuse he wants to compel the GOP (hardliners?) to pick up their slack for Obama's political success. Mr. Shultz feels that if you were for total war A (Iraq?) then you should be for "mini war" B (Syria) or you must be a racist.
Anyone who expects or even hopes that someone's argument for or against anything will be reasonable and consistent is out of touch with reality.
I see what you are trying to do here Grim 17 and I have something to say about it.
To wit:
I am not a person who automatically agrees with anything that anyone, including Ed Schultz, says about anything.
But I do believe that Mr Schultz makes a valid point here.
There are plenty of valid reasons to oppose a U.S. Military attack on Syria.
Anyone who is opposed to it because they 'think' that shutting it down will hurt the 1st Black American elected to the office of President of the USA has more problems than I have time to talk about here, but, unfortunately, there are plenty of people on the far right in the USA who have those problems and the U.S. Congress voting against an attack on Syria will not make those problems go away.
The only way to eliminate those problems that I know of is a one way trip to a graveyard for those who have them.
I'll just add that I noticed some time ago that some losers on the right will use any chance that they find to try to slam Obama and anyone associated with him. I've also noticed that Obama is still in the White House and it is very likely that he will be there until another Democrat takes his place in 2017, whether anyone on the right likes it or not.
I'll also add that ignoring racism has never made it go away, it must be attacked every time that it raises it's ugly head.
I could say a lot more but I'll just leave it at that for now.
If anything that I have said here hurts anyone's 'feelings', well, that's just tough-deal with it. I have no sympathy whatsoever for you.
"At the heart of racism is the religious assertion that God made a creative mistake when He brought some people into being." ~ Friedrich Otto Hertz
This kind of "reasoning" (I use the term loosely) makes me want to puke. There is something intrinsically wrong with people who blame everything on skin color. We really need to change the definition of racism.
They didn't vote for him because he's black and they're racist.
They hate him because he's black and they're racist.
They're making a big deal about Benghazi because he's black and they're racist.
They don't like Obamacare because he's black and they're racist.
They won't vote for the president's Syria plans because he's black and they're racist.
They want him to fail because he's black and they're racist.
They oppose his policies because he's black and they're racist.
Schultz has no valid point. Too many people have taken their strategy from the Junior High School Girls' Playbook. Whenever there's a need for a put down, leave it to a 14-year-old to say, "You're (She's) just jealous." Substitute "racist" for "jealous" and I think you get the picture.
Nobody buys this **** except idiots who watch these ridiculous infotainment programs or who are impressed by the likes of Jesse Jackson. Or who are RACIST THEMSELVES.
Now. Hand me a puke bag.
I'll just repeat what I said above: Ignoring racism has never made it go away.
Anyone who thinks there is no racism in the USA hasn't spent much time on the internet.
Anyone who is upset by anything that Ed Schultz (Or anyone else on TV or the radio.) has to say needs to learn how to change the channel.
But I do believe that Mr Schultz makes a valid point here.
I have a theory...people on message boards who complain the most about left wing pundits calling out the some of the right for possible racism? They are probably the same ones who have been calling Obama a KenyanMarxistMuslimWhohatesAmerica the past 5years.
Just another day at the office for MSNBC and their #1 liberal hate monger.
Schultz: Hatred For Our First Black President Not A Reason To Oppose Syria Attack | RealClearPolitics
Have I in the last 5 years called Obama:
A Kenyan... No
A Marxist... No
A Muslim... No
A person who hates America... No
Conclusion:
So much for that brilliant theory of yours.
It seems Grim17 IS that one viewer. The whole place will shut down if he stops watching.How does this network have more than one viewer?
How does this network have more than one viewer? Their ONLY line of defense is crying, "Racist!!!!111"
It seems Grim17 IS that one viewer. The whole place will shut down if he stops watching.
I complain about it, and I never called Obama any of those things either. So far your theory is garbage. Why don't you put your thinking cap on here for a moment and try to grasp what is really going on. Let me give you a hint: opposition to Obama has nothing to do with his skin color. It has to do with his ideology. If you don't understand that, then maybe you shouldn't be posting.Don't know....are you one of the people on message boards.complaining about some of the GOP being called racists?
I have a theory...people on message boards who complain the most about left wing pundits calling out the some of the right for possible racism? They are probably the same ones who have been calling Obama a KenyanMarxistMuslimWhohatesAmerica the past 5years.
I complain about it, and I never called Obama any of those things either. So far your theory is garbage. Why don't you put your thinking cap on here for a moment and try to grasp what is really going on. Let me give you a hint: opposition to Obama has nothing to do with his skin color. It has to do with his ideology. If you don't understand that, then maybe you shouldn't be posting.
Just another day at the office for MSNBC and their #1 liberal hate monger.
Schultz: Hatred For Our First Black President Not A Reason To Oppose Syria Attack | RealClearPolitics
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?