• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Early US intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites, sources say

Fletch said:
Except I wasnt commenting on that. Not sure we could know with certainty how much damage occurred in a secret underground facility we have no ability to gain access to, but if our strongest bombs failed to penetrate the site, then we may need to build a bigger bomb.
Click to expand...
Yup. More and bigger bombs is always the answer right? And then all the Warhawks and Neocons cheered in unison. It’s a good you’re against that sort of interventionism… on every third Tuesday during odd leap years.
 
Fletch said:
Its all just hate and snark, I get that. Its all you guys ever do. But you would think you would want the American military to be successful when it acts. But no, you hate trump more than you love America
Click to expand...
Not hate. Just deserts. And it has **** all to do with the officers and crew who did their jobs. Shame. Shame on you.

It's about Trump prematurely ejaculating "obliterated" and Leavitt telling the world not to believe their lying eyes.
 
Fletch said:
Yes. Its entirely possible that its the same source. But it is weird how gleeful you libs are to learn that our attempts to knock out Irans nuclear ambitions might not have worked as well as we hoped. Did you also cheer Carters failed raid to free the hostages back in 1980?
Click to expand...
Who is cheering? Is it wrong to point out that Donald is a failure? Pentagon advisors told them in January that the conventional weapons would not destroy Fordow.
 
TangoNoCash said:
Yup. More and bigger bombs is always the answer right? And then all the Warhawks and Neocons cheered in unison. It’s a good you’re against that sort of interventionism… on every third Tuesday during odd leap years.
Click to expand...
Will you be running around the streets waving the Iranian flag?
 
reinaert said:
Not hate. Just deserts. And it has **** all to do with the officers and crew who did their jobs. Shame. Shame on you.

It's about Trump prematurely ejaculating "obliterated" and Leavitt telling the world not to believe their lying eyes.
Click to expand...
Its hate. You are just trying to rationalize it
 
Fletch said:
Take all the time you need to compose yourself.
Click to expand...
Okay I think I’m ready. No I won’t be doing that. My official country flag at the moment is an upside down US flag.
 
Rexedgar said:
“Everyone knows what happens when you drop 14 30k bombs perfectly on their targets…………”





Baghdad Barbie settles it!
Click to expand...

So the assessment is real according to Leavitt.
 
trixare4kids said:
Rules for thee but not for anti-Trump leakers divulging top secret information to the likes of someone like Natasha Bertrand. I think her story is bullshit.
Click to expand...
Thank you for your valuable contribution.

/s
 
trixare4kids said:
Rules for thee but not for anti-Trump leakers divulging top secret information to the likes of someone like Natasha Bertrand. I think her story is bullshit.
Click to expand...
I mean, Trump had all those classified docs in improper storage in his golf course, so it seems like it's rules for all.

lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom