• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Early US intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites, sources say

Yeah, that's awkward on Donald's part. Declaring a Donald-brokered ceasefire before he even knew whether his strikes were successful. If they weren't, now Iran can return to the status quo while Donald has to figure out how to worm his way out of his own ceasefire "deal" and if he doesn't, Israel will attack anyway and make Donald look like a cuck on the world state.

Poor baby.
Well they might turn back to their tried and true "Fake News" cries.
 
Well they might turn back to their tried and true "Fake News" cries.
Wouldn't that just be the most deliciously ironic situation for Iran to find itself in: your nuclear enrichment facilities aren't destroyed, but Donald is scared of losing face so you say to the world, "oh woe is us, our nuclear facilities were completely and Strongly obliterated by Donald's powerful bomb, oh shucks I guess no nukes for us" then you quietly get back to processing ore.

And Donald won't even listen to his own intelligence community telling him if this happens, because his ego won't allow him to hear it.
 
I'm a Trump supporter......you didn't see me yesterday, did you? Does it make you angry that Trump possibly could have done something right and correct? Is it an impossible thing to ever accept?
It certainly my would surprise the shit out of me!

And make me immediately suspicious that he was just doing what an actual competent individual told him to do.
 
Trump said immediately after the bombing that their weapons program was "obliterated".

Maybe that was reckless as satellite photos we're even available yet.
As usual trump speaks bullshit. He had no way of knowing the results, but stupidly proclaimed success.
Trump operates in ignorance.
 
Or…Trump prematurely claimed “obliterated” when he could have easily said the missions went off exactly as planned, commended our military and said that the extent of the damage done would be forthcoming as intelligence evaluated after the fact.


But nope…he went with “completely obliterated” and backed himself into this f*cking corner like a moron.
As he always does.
 
I know @Allan thinks I'm wrong to favor odds Trump will nuke, but with all this public  winning we know he is going to overcompensate.

Who in the room can or will talk him out of it?
 

Early US intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites, sources say!


FAKE NEWS!!!


KING-DICTATOR-MAGAT-PRESIDENT Trump says those sites were "obliterated", a beautiful thing!

I have to believe our President on this one, he would never lie or speak falsely to the American people or the world!
 
"Low level loser" aptly describes Leavitt.

Indeed.

Baghdad Barbie also claimed that dear leader came up with the motto peace through strength.

Baghdad Barbie literally admits the intelligence exists.

She on one hand says it was classified top secret but still leaked, then turns around and calls it an ‘alleged assessment’.

Only in the world of cult45/47 can something that doesn’t exist be leaked.
 
Trump said it was "obliterated". Rush to judgement?
Worse.
Trump has a routine.
He jumps to the conclusion that he WANTS to be true, then yells that it is.
“I won.” Even though he didn’t.
“They were building a nuke” based on “a feeling” he had. His own intel folks said Iran was not building a nuke.
“Totally obliterated” before there was any way of knowing.
He is a very twisted, lying idiot.
 
I know @Allan thinks I'm wrong to favor odds Trump will nuke, but with all this public  winning we know he is going to overcompensate.

Who in the room can or will talk him out of it?
Yes, but the way he overcompensates is by whining furiously on Truth Social about how unfair his whole life is.
 
Journalists protect source's privacy. Nothing new.
It is perfectly acceptable and should be taken as gospel when KING-DICTATOR-MAGAT-PRESIDENT Trump and Trump Administration company quote "unnamed sources" or even make up "unnamed sources", but it is totally not alright when anyone LEFT of the Centerline does it.

It is an unwritten rule all MAGATS et al know by heart.
 
Back
Top Bottom