McCarthy ignores of course that Sussman declares under oath in his response that the EOP data all preceded Trump. That's disappointing. He's supposed to be a serious former prosecutor. You'd think a declaration under oath by Sussman's team would get a mention, somewhere. It's a fact easily established at trial, and Durham could have easily addressed this claim in his next filing, but Durham left the time period deliberately vague, again.NYT is spinning, deflecting, and obfuscating - like you do. I know you won't read this, but some here will, at least those who want to know the truth. The Misleading Claim That Durham’s Reference to Trump White House Records Was Misleading
Again, NYT is spinning because they are complicit in spreading the Russia Hoax.
1 For example, although the Special Counsel implies that in Mr. Sussmann’s February 9, 2017 meeting, he provided Agency-2 with EOP data from after Mr. Trump took office, the Special Counsel is well aware that the data provided to Agency-2 pertained only to the period of time before Mr. Trump took office, when Barack Obama was President
Without leaks and media drama durham is bringing indictments. How did you find out? It's been over two years, where are the indictments?Durham is bringing indictments. He's doing so very carefully and without leaks and media drama.
Unlike every investigation that democrats run, which is intended only to feed media narratives.
This is an actual investigation, and the only time we hear what's going on is when court documents are filed. As it should be.
That's what we heard last year.Actually the indictment was last week. More will follow.
NYT is spinning, deflecting, and obfuscating - like you do. I know you won't read this, but some here will, at least those who want to know the truth. The Misleading Claim That Durham’s Reference to Trump White House Records Was Misleading
Again, NYT is spinning because they are complicit in spreading the Russia Hoax.
Give up. It's not teh NY Times it's Durham himself that said your media was lying.
Hang in thereDurham is bringing indictments. He's doing so very carefully and without leaks and media drama.
Unlike every investigation that democrats run, which is intended only to feed media narratives.
This is an actual investigation, and the only time we hear what's going on is when court documents are filed. As it should be.
Seriously?
WTF?
Facts are facts no matter how ****ed up an individual is.
Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing (Published 2022)
The special counsel implicitly acknowledged that White House internet data he discussed, which conservative outlets have portrayed as proof of spying on the Trump White House, came from the Obama era.www.nytimes.com
Let's hear from the cultists now, just a few days removed from the false narrative placed on the Durham filing by the fake hate media.
Come on, don't hide.
Your media makes fools of you. When will you renounce cult realizing you are being played for a dupe?
It's OK to be conservative. It is not OK to have false facts which the last 5 years has become the norm.
Argue about philosophy as we once did, don't deny reality.
Be Americans again.
Those capable of recognizing facts and reality.
I should have incl by "Ex post facto SNARK warning". Nonetheless, the fact that counts the most is the fact that the RW Trump cult Rep/cons don't count facts. It may be very well their reality that takes the House and Senate in this yrs election. What do you think of that reality? How about the reality of the fact that the Dems are cowards that don't do **** to defend democracy or get out in front of issues while the Rep/cons smear them for, how many yrs?
Real in their minds. Not real though.Alt reality is real to those who believe.
Likely to be realized.Whether certain individuals truly believe it, a whole lot of Rep/cons support that alt reality and with enough others can get a so supporting Rep/con Congress elected this year. That's reality.
We'll know more when this goes to trial.
WTF??
I had no idea you were capable of such stupid posts. Are you for real?
Theoretically, yes. Of course, neither will ever spend a second in prison.Trump will be arrested longgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg before Hillary.
LOL
Your failure to understand the context of today's reality is shared by the great majority of elected Dems who think it so unreal they need not respond, and thus let the attack on democracy and civil liberties go unchallenged to any meaningful extent. Though I certainly intended a degree of SNARK in my post, it is a fact that there are enough Rep/con/Trump cult voters who support alt reality that could have them in control of both the House and Senate after the 2022 election. If you don't get that, it is you and others like you who are too stupid to count the fact of those votes that could make alt reality THE reality. The Dems are the most politically stupid party I've seen in my lifetime. You can't get politically dumber than Dems. Get that straight. WTF is that you don't get that. When the Rep party says that the 1/6 attack on the Capitol was of "ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse.", you better believe that fascism is on the rise and it's not something to be ignored, as the Dems have been largely ignoring much the same thing for many yrs.
Seems to me it is up to justice to defend democracy at present. Do you disagree?
what I think he is worried about is having a judge rule that because of the media coverage, he is using the information as a political weapon , and dismiss it.Nowhere in the article is Durham saying that Fox is lying. He said that "members of the media" may have "misinterpreted" claims that he made in a previous filing.
He was probably talking about the left-wing media claiming it's a nothing burger.
It's you who is lying.
Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing (Published 2022)
The special counsel implicitly acknowledged that White House internet data he discussed, which conservative outlets have portrayed as proof of spying on the Trump White House, came from the Obama era.www.nytimes.com
Let's hear from the cultists now, just a few days removed from the false narrative placed on the Durham filing by the fake hate media.
Come on, don't hide.
Your media makes fools of you. When will you renounce cult realizing you are being played for a dupe?
It's OK to be conservative. It is not OK to have false facts which the last 5 years has become the norm.
Argue about philosophy as we once did, don't deny reality.
Be Americans again.
very nice. that explains it. going in my sig.NYT is spinning, deflecting, and obfuscating - like you do. I know you won't read this, but some here will, at least those who want to know the truth. The Misleading Claim That Durham’s Reference to Trump White House Records Was Misleading
Again, NYT is spinning because they are complicit in spreading the Russia Hoax.
very nice. that explains it. going in my sig.
Real in their minds. Not real though.
In the post Loser #45 era, a distinction that must be constantly reinforced with every Trumplican/Trumpster lie.
Likely to be realized.
I fail to see what that has to do with your post on the first page.
WTF? Just say you were wrong for making such a dumb post and move on. This crap makes no sense.As unreal is the Rep/con beliefs are that make up their own reality, it is real to them as much as any fact-based opinion that logic would conclude is real by the rational mind. But it is those beliefs are what is dictating the reality of the world we live in, specifically in America. It is that unreal belief that has filled the SC with a majority that supports those beliefs, diluting our democracy. I said " You have your reality, they have theirs. Who's to say which is real?" So, guess who is saying which is real? And convincing the nation of such by various rule of our 3 govt branches, especially the SC? The ones with or without the facts? Who do you hear most often speaking-out in favor of their beliefs and against the other party, the Rep/con or Dem party?
I say leaving the defense of democracy in only the hands of justice, the SC being the highest form of justice in America, is ignoring reality.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?