• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Durham (1 Viewer)

N

noonereal

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Aug 31, 2018
Messages
60,337
Reaction score
27,397
www.nytimes.com

Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing (Published 2022)

The special counsel implicitly acknowledged that White House internet data he discussed, which conservative outlets have portrayed as proof of spying on the Trump White House, came from the Obama era.
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com

Let's hear from the cultists now, just a few days removed from the false narrative placed on the Durham filing by the fake hate media.

Come on, don't hide.

Your media makes fools of you. When will you renounce cult realizing you are being played for a dupe?

It's OK to be conservative. It is not OK to have false facts which the last 5 years has become the norm.

Argue about philosophy as we once did, don't deny reality.

Be Americans again.
 
noonereal said:
www.nytimes.com

Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing (Published 2022)

The special counsel implicitly acknowledged that White House internet data he discussed, which conservative outlets have portrayed as proof of spying on the Trump White House, came from the Obama era.
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com

Let's hear from the cultists now, just a few days removed from the false narrative placed on the Durham filing by the fake hate media.

Come on, don't hide.

Your media makes fools of you. When will you renounce cult realizing you are being played for a dupe?

It's OK to be conservative. It is not OK to have false facts which the last 5 years has become the norm.

Argue about philosophy as we once did, don't deny reality.

Be Americans again.
Click to expand...

You have your reality, they have theirs. Who's to say which is real?
 
Not one cultist has dared to face the music. The truth. That his insidious media has again made them a fool.
 
noonereal said:
Seriously?

WTF?

Facts are facts no matter how ****ed up an individual is.
Click to expand...

Durham presents facts, the left presents emotional appeals and deflection.
 
noonereal said:
www.nytimes.com

Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing (Published 2022)

The special counsel implicitly acknowledged that White House internet data he discussed, which conservative outlets have portrayed as proof of spying on the Trump White House, came from the Obama era.
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com

Let's hear from the cultists now, just a few days removed from the false narrative placed on the Durham filing by the fake hate media.

Come on, don't hide.

Your media makes fools of you. When will you renounce cult realizing you are being played for a dupe?

It's OK to be conservative. It is not OK to have false facts which the last 5 years has become the norm.

Argue about philosophy as we once did, don't deny reality.

Be Americans again.
Click to expand...

NYT is spinning, deflecting, and obfuscating - like you do. I know you won't read this, but some here will, at least those who want to know the truth. The Misleading Claim That Durham’s Reference to Trump White House Records Was Misleading
Durham further asserts, moreover, that Sussmann based his framing of Trump as a Russian spy on data Joffe had mined from EOP Internet traffic. There is no reason to doubt that this is true — indeed, in their pushback, Sussmann apologists are not claiming that EOP traffic mined by Joffe formed no part of Sussmann’s presentation to the CIA; they are claiming that the DNS data from EOP is from the Obama years (and they want you to believe it must all be from the Obama years, even though a small portion of it is almost certainly from Trump’s first weeks in office). Again, Durham was entirely transparent about that.
Click to expand...

Again, NYT is spinning because they are complicit in spreading the Russia Hoax.
 
Subieguy said:
he does, then where is the proof????
Click to expand...

Durham is bringing indictments. He's doing so very carefully and without leaks and media drama.

Unlike every investigation that democrats run, which is intended only to feed media narratives.

This is an actual investigation, and the only time we hear what's going on is when court documents are filed. As it should be.
 
Schism said:
Durham is bringing indictments. He's doing so very carefully and without leaks and media drama.

Unlike every investigation that democrats run, which is intended only to feed media narratives.

This is an actual investigation, and the only time we hear what's going on is when court documents are filed. As it should be.
Click to expand...
never mind a prosecutor discredited him yesterday!!
 
Schism said:
Durham is bringing indictments. He's doing so very carefully and without leaks and media drama.

Unlike every investigation that democrats run, which is intended only to feed media narratives.

This is an actual investigation, and the only time we hear what's going on is when court documents are filed. As it should be.
Click to expand...
Then why did you say this:

Schism said:
All in good time. Step-by-step, one Clinton stooge at a time. It's all going back to Hillary, her emails, and server.
Click to expand...
?

Your getting your "leaks" from somewhere. Someone is feeding you lies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top Bottom