• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Doug Emhoff accused of ‘forcefully slapping’ NYC girlfriend

Is this any better or worse than 'Grab em by the P****. This is alleged to have happened. Trump was found civilly to have grabbed a reporter's ***** against her will. I am not condoning either attack. But this is a nothingburger compared with the guy who is running for president.

Emhoff is not running for anything. He slapped a girlfriend once 12 years ago. Oh my God !
True colors are on display
 
Don't see why this entire thread and its premise are relevant. Is Emhoff running for office? Does the spouse of a President suddenly have powers we have not heard about before?

Is this bit or news trivia even verified in any way?
Harris is married to this man who had an affair, impregnated the nanny, paid her off, then got a divorce. Past history coming out now. If he slapped this girl 12 years ago, it was probably not the first or last time.
Harris slept with older men to advance. But TRUMP!!!!
 

It's looking like the guy the Washington Post called "The Antidote to Toxic Masculinity" not only got his nanny pregnant, but forcefully slapped a woman he was dating for just a few months because she put her hand on the shoulder of a valet.

"Dougie," it would seem, is not all he's cracked up to be.

According to modern Trumpist thought, she totally had it coming for engaging in an activity that was not either cooking in the kitchen or being pregnant.

Trump, the actual candidate, is a rapist / sexual assaulter. And you're trying to tell me I have to vote for him because a non-candidate husband was accused of hitting someone in 2012?
 
What’s hysterical is watching MAGAs that WILL vote for someone who sexually assaulted women and has been convicted of 34 felonies pretend they actually care that maybe the spouse of a candidate slapped someone more than a decade ago. MAYBE. A tabloid says that MAGAs should care about this. So...here we are.


😂😂😂


Absolutely hysterical.

No, what's hysterical is watching you lot make every forum thread about MAGAS and the lame attempts to discredit any opinion they've offered.
 
According to modern Trumpist thought, she totally had it coming for engaging in an activity that was not either cooking in the kitchen or being pregnant.

Trump, the actual candidate, is a rapist / sexual assaulter. And you're trying to tell me I have to vote for him because a non-candidate husband was accused of hitting someone in 2012?

case in point ^
 
No, what's hysterical is watching you lot make every forum thread about MAGAS and the lame attempts to discredit any opinion they've offered
I find MAGAs amusing.

They're going to vote for a felon who is guilty of sexual assault - among other things.

Yet screech about Doug maybe slapping someone in 2012 because of a tabloid.


Yes...I find it hysterical.
 
Oh that civil trial where the jury didn't find him guilty of rape & where the judge tried to claim it really was rape?
Wait, he was charged with rape and found not guilty? :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: in a civil trial? :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

You need to brush up on US law.
 
So, Trump’s behavior makes Doug’s OK? Whataboutism is never a good look and means you have lost the argument.
Yep, diving right in...:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
Is this the Republican's October surprise? Going after her husband?

Doug is 100x a better choice for POTUS than Trump, but he's also not running for that position...so, you know, who cares that they found someone to accuse him of something that doesn't even register next to Trump's record of bad shit.

Also, people who are correct can make mistakes, but it can harm their leadership brand if they aren't Republican. Republican revel in the mistakes of their candidates.

What's next, mocking the attack on Paul Pelosi?

Don Jr Post:
View attachment 67535697
They’re not done with going after both families.
GOPs aren’t pro-life when it comes to the Walz kids.
 
yeah, they twisted it into his nanny..not his nanny...she isn't a nanny at all...she is a teacher at the school his kid attended...and it wasn't his child's teacher either. The affair that ended his marriage is his and his ex wife's business...they dealt with it...he ended up divorced because of it...I would venture to guess that about 60% of the Republicans on this board have cheated on their spouse....while not separated, like he was.
More than 50%...in Red states.
 
I would like to hear presidential candidate Harris explain how she reconciles potential first "gentleman's" past with domestic abuse in light of her very vocal past condemnations of domestic abusers and sexual assault perpetrators. There are allegedly three witnesses to Doug committing an act of domestic abuse.

I especially want to know if Kamala Harris really does “believe women” who are “survivors of sexual assault.
 
I find MAGAs amusing.

They're going to vote for a felon who is guilty of sexual assault - among other things.

Yet screech about Doug maybe slapping someone in 2012 because of a tabloid.


Yes...I find it hysterical.

Ahem. The thread topic, please.
Odd that you would think domestic abuse is amusing.

"Women are to be believed" Right?
 
I would like to hear presidential candidate Harris explain how she reconciles potential first "gentleman's" past with domestic abuse in light of her very vocal past condemnations of domestic abusers and sexual assault perpetrators. There are allegedly three witnesses to Doug committing an act of domestic abuse.

I especially want to know if Kamala Harris really does “believe women” who are “survivors of sexual assault.
We must believe women. Problem for you is this is a dude writing for a tabloid.
 
Harris is married to this man who had an affair, impregnated the nanny, paid her off, then got a divorce. Past history coming out now. If he slapped this girl 12 years ago, it was probably not the first or last time.
Harris slept with older men to advance. But TRUMP!!!!
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
Oh that civil trial where the jury didn't find him guilty of rape & where the judge tried to claim it really was rape?
Judicial system says what the judicial system says. Sorry, but your messiah is an adjudicated rapist. Learn to cope better.
 
No, what's hysterical is watching you lot make every forum thread about MAGAS and the lame attempts to discredit any opinion they've offered.
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
I would like to hear presidential candidate Harris explain how she reconciles potential first "gentleman's" past with domestic abuse in light of her very vocal past condemnations of domestic abusers and sexual assault perpetrators. There are allegedly three witnesses to Doug committing an act of domestic abuse.

I especially want to know if Kamala Harris really does “believe women” who are “survivors of sexual assault.
There is no proof that this allegation is even true....even the ex girlfriend told them to get lost.
 
No, what's hysterical is watching you lot make every forum thread about MAGAS and the lame attempts to discredit any opinion they've offered.
MAGA clones come discredited right from the factory.
 
Let's also remember, this is the same Doug Emhoff whose first wife ended their marriage because he impregnated his child's nanny.
 
Back
Top Bottom