You're making the assumption that gay soldiers aren't going to discriminate against straight soldiers.
How are you going to feel, when soldiers refuse to billet with soldiers who are of a different sexual orientation?
What exactly does that have to do with the gayness of a particular officer? A bad and unworthy officer discriminates. Their sexual orientation has nothing to do with it. Of course, you think that being gay makes you bad and unworthy...
You're making the assumption that gay soldiers aren't going to discriminate against straight soldiers.
How are you going to feel, when soldiers refuse to billet with soldiers who are of a different sexual orientation?
So, if you don't mind me asking, what about Gays serving openly would have made you decide not to serve?
I would not like to be in the Navy serving aboard ships at sea for periods of 90 days living in close quarters, showering, etc with men that were sexually attracted to me.........
I will just muffle my response....I won't let you bait me............Have a nice evening............
I would not like to be in the Navy serving aboard ships at sea for periods of 90 days living in close quarters, showering, etc with men that were sexually attracted to me.........
Good luck with that argument in any court.
If there is discrimination, it should be reported and addressed.
You're making the assumption that it won't.
I'll feel like Leavenworth will need to expand since they are refusing an order.
I think the UCMJ can take of that considering sex is only allowed on base between people that are married.
Its a fact, whether you like it or not about 90% of this country are God Fearing Christians (myself included) and would not want to serve with openly gay men for the reasons I have stated over and over.......
Its a fact, whether you like it or not about 90% of this country are God Fearing Christians (myself included) and would not want to serve with openly gay men for the reasons I have stated over and over.......
And, now we have homophobe accusation #2.
Well, that's the wrong answer, since you would be violating the rights of those soldiers. Wanna try again?
Yes, but sex, in the billets is very much prohibited.
That is all they have my friend.............the homophobe abd bigot card..........how stale and obnoxious it is..........
Yes, but sex, in the billets is very much prohibited.
:rofl
You said "but sex". :lol:
It wasn't bait. I was just trying to get you to understand why people call you that. It's comments like that. It's absurd. Of all the dangers our seamen face, sharing the same air with homosexuals isn't even on the radar. The only thing that would propell it to the top of the list is bigotry.
I think it comes from a basic ignorance of how the system actually works.
Did you see where IT said that soldiers who refuse to billet with other soldiers should go to Leavenworth? How would he look--as an officer--sending a female soldier to Leavenworth, because she refused to share a latrine with male soldiers?
And gays have been there.:roll:
And guess who the first poster was to notice? :ssst:
Have you looked at the latest polls of what young people have to say about it? Hello young people are the recruits!
Did you see where I said a legal order? Your example is not a legal order.
I'll feel like Leavenworth will need to expand since they are refusing an order.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?