• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Donna Brazile: I found 'proof' the DNC rigged the nomination for Hillary Clinton

American

American

Trump Grump Whisperer
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
96,461
Reaction score
33,781
Location
Western Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Donna Brazile: I found 'proof' the DNC rigged the nomination for Hillary Clinton | Fox News
The fix was in after all.




Last year's presidential primary between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders was rigged by the Democratic National Committee - just as Sanders' supporters suspected - to hand the nomination to Clinton, according to a bombshell claim by Donna Brazile. The onetime Clinton confidante, CNN commentator and former interim party boss made the explosive claim Thursday while touting a new book that could sever her ties to Team Clinton for good.
“I had promised Bernie when I took the helm of the Democratic National Committee after the convention that I would get to the bottom of whether Hillary Clinton’s team had rigged the nomination process, as a cache of emails stolen by Russian hackers and posted online had suggested,” Brazile wrote in a piece for Politico Magazine.
Click to expand...
Looks like Democrat voters really got screwed.
 
American said:
Donna Brazile: I found 'proof' the DNC rigged the nomination for Hillary Clinton | Fox News

Looks like Democrat voters really got screwed.
Click to expand...

The good news for Democrats is that the Clinton era is both shamed and dead. Donna Brazile was a part of that cabal of political corruption, and FINALLY someone has a thimble of courage to tell the truth. The DNC was bought and paid for by Clinton.

Brazeile no onger fears the Clintons...and like the death of Stalin, the repressed and fearful are getting out their knives on those who they secretly hated.
 
ataraxia said:
Bernie as president and the House and Senate in GOP hands... hmmm, I wonder how much would get accomplished? :lamo
Click to expand...

I'd wager more than trump has so far legislatively speaking... and that's with his own party.
 
American said:
Donna Brazile: I found 'proof' the DNC rigged the nomination for Hillary Clinton | Fox News

Looks like Democrat voters really got screwed.
Click to expand...
It may indeed be accurate. My gut says it is.

But it sucks to have to get this from Brazille, a terrible liar with no credibility. It would be better carried by a more trustworthy source. I suspect she's written the upcoming book because she is black-balled from legit major-media employment, after her leaked CNN debate questions to HRC.

She really tarnished CNN's reputation with that.
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Obviously they knew Bernie had no chance.
Click to expand...
In the nomination, or the election.

Bernie polled very well against Trump in the national. In fact, pretty much everyone on the Dem side did, except for Hillary. And here we are.
 
Chomsky said:
It may indeed be accurate. My gut says it is.

But it sucks to have to get this from Brazille, a terrible liar with no credibility. It would be better carried by a more trustworthy source. I suspect she's written the upcoming book because she is black-balled from legit major-media employment, after her leaked CNN debate questions to HRC.

She really tarnished CNN's reputation with that.
Click to expand...

And it wasn't even that big a deal, but it looked like it was, because she seemed to be working for them in an official capacity and not the network itself, but the Democrats
 
Chomsky said:
In the nomination, or the election.

Bernie polled very well against Trump in the national. In fact, pretty much everyone on the Dem side did, except for Hillary. And here we are.
Click to expand...

The pact was signed in 2015. So primaries. Though I do know the RNC works very closely with the campaign they think will likely win too. That's why the RNC was bending over for Trump even before the convention. With only two players on the DNC sides. Obvious is Obvious. Or so they thought...

Joe should have run, and he might have had a better shot.
 
Chomsky said:
In the nomination, or the election.

Bernie polled very well against Trump in the national. In fact, pretty much everyone on the Dem side did, except for Hillary. And here we are.
Click to expand...

Bernie would have beaten Trump I am quite sure, in fact I am sure that I said this by Jan/Feb 2016...

Everyone on the D side.....there was never supposed to be anyone but Hillary, The Party was clear on that even back to 2014, and only Sanders mattered, a guy who is not a Democrat and never really was.
 
Chomsky said:
In the nomination, or the election.

Bernie polled very well against Trump in the national. In fact, pretty much everyone on the Dem side did, except for Hillary. And here we are.
Click to expand...
Yet despite that, more Democrats turned out for Clinton than for Sanders. I'm not saying that the Clinton camp didn't play dirty (they did), but to believe Sanders lost because of some DNC tricks is just not holding liberal voters accountable for their own decisions.

Truth be told, the reason Sanders lost is because a lot orthodox feminists wanted a female president at any cost, and were willing to go with a ****ty candidate to do it. I'm not trying to sound like some winger that babbles on about SJW's, but that was a factor we simply can't ignore, or else were going to repeat it.
 
American said:
He had Hillary worried.
Click to expand...

More pissed than worried I would say as Clinton Corp had full control of the party, their demands got met.

Bernie was never going to pull a Barack, they had long ago made sure of that.

They are still pissed.
 
Last edited:
NeverTrumpGOP said:
The pact was signed in 2015. So primaries. Though I do know the RNC works very closely with the campaign they think will likely win too. That's why the RNC was bending over for Trump even before the convention. With only two players on the DNC sides. Obvious is Obvious. Or so they thought...

Joe should have run, and he might have had a better shot.
Click to expand...
Joe would have won!

One good or two good shouts of "That's malarkey!" in the debates, like he did against Ryan, would probably do it! :mrgreen:
 
lurchadams said:
Great timing Donna. Thanks, and please go the **** away. I hope your book sales tank.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I feel much the same way. These people always find moral courage after exhibiting it poses no more risk to them. It's like the politicians who retire and THEN tell us what's wrong with the party, and all the frauds they willingly joined in perpetrating when they benefitted from it.

In a way, I guess it's good for this to come out but Donna gets no high fives from here. We can't know for sure, but my guess is there's a roughly 100% chance if Hillary had won, she'd have taken the job she earned with the campaign and be showing up on TV as a staunch Hillary surrogate at every possible opportunity.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
Bernie would have beaten Trump I am quite sure, in fact I am sure that I said this by Jan/Feb 2016...

Everyone on the D side.....there was never supposed to be anyone but Hillary, The Party was clear on that even back to 2014, and only Sanders mattered, a guy who is not a Democrat and never really was.
Click to expand...
I believe you did say this.

And you were also correct all along, in that this was a "throw the bums out" year. So the Dems in turn nominate the most disliked bum on the planet! Only to see their bum beaten by an even more disliked non-bum.

(It was very much a non-bum year, and still might be)
 
Chomsky said:
Joe would have won!

One good or two good shouts of "That's malarkey!" in the debates, like he did against Ryan, would probably do it! :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

Fire off two shotgun shells!
 
Chomsky said:
Joe would have won!

One good or two good shouts of "That's malarkey!" in the debates, like he did against Ryan, would probably do it! :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

Biden spent a few months during 2015 with the top data guys who told him that he had almost no chance, it was already too late (After years of work by Clinton Corp to keep everyone including Biden out), so he did not run.

The fact that he now says "I thought I could beat Hillary" is revisionist history, because had he not believed the data guys he would have run.
 
Last edited:
I'm going to buy this book as soon as I get done contributing to the $10,000,000 Corey Feldman says he needs to make a movie exposing Hollywood. :lamo
 
MovingPictures said:
Yet despite that, more Democrats turned out for Clinton than for Sanders. I'm not saying that the Clinton camp didn't play dirty (they did), but to believe Sanders lost because of some DNC tricks is just not holding liberal voters accountable for their own decisions.

Truth be told, the reason Sanders lost is because a lot orthodox feminists wanted a female president at any cost, and were willing to go with a ****ty candidate to do it. I'm not trying to sound like some winger that babbles on about SJW's, but that was a factor we simply can't ignore, or else were going to repeat it.
Click to expand...
No, not claiming Bernie was robbed. The truth is, the majority Dem rank & file preferred HRC - though not overwhelmingly.

In a twist, the complete Dem despise for trump, especially younger voters, may now give the Dem Party the voter enthusiasm they needed in 2016, but didn't get due to Hillary.
 
The truth is that we all know Bernie got hosed by the nonsense with superdelegates that were already committed to Hilary regardless of how their state did in the primaries.

I wonder why we're picking this particular scab off at this particular moment in time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom