• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DOJ: White supremacists hoped to ignite “race war” by attacking power grids

tacomancer

Christian Capitalist Social Democrat
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
63,145
Reaction score
45,084
Location
NE Ohio
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal

EdwinWillers

"Who will tell us the truth?"
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Messages
10,745
Reaction score
7,793
Location
Red Colorado
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Three guys in their early 20's with far too much time on their hands, who likely spend most of it at their playstations, and who probably don't know the first thing about power substations or how to attack them.

Not saying their intentions aren't bad - they most definitely are.
Nor am I downplaying the consequences were they to make good on their intentions, to even a single substation - it wouldn't be good.

That said, even if they were successful in taking down one substation, the grid is far more resilient than that.
Substations lose main power transformers more often than people realize - and these yahoos, thinking they can take one down with a rifle, well - they'd probably get caught firing the rifle long before any of their bullets had the desired effect.

Again, I'm not downplaying their intentions, but I think it's a bit hyperbolic to think the intentions of three 20-somethings represent "right wing fascists and white supremacists." Most guys at that age don't even know what either of those labels even means - EVEN IF they were self-professed as either or both.
Moreover, the number of such imbeciles in our nation is so incredibly small that believing them some sort of "threat to our way of life" - let alone the "#1 threat" is even more of a stretch.

If our "way of life" is truly that fragile that a handful of 20-somethings are its #1 threat - we need to be more concerned about the former rather than the latter.
 

Rawley

Sedition Apologist™ and Charter Cult Member™
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 16, 2020
Messages
25,283
Reaction score
7,932
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative

Gateman_Wen

Official disruptive influence
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
19,684
Reaction score
20,791
Location
Middle of it all
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Three guys in their early 20's with far too much time on their hands, who likely spend most of it at their playstations, and who probably don't know the first thing about power substations or how to attack them.

Not saying their intentions aren't bad - they most definitely are.
Nor am I downplaying the consequences were they to make good on their intentions, to even a single substation - it wouldn't be good.

That said, even if they were successful in taking down one substation, the grid is far more resilient than that.
Substations lose main power transformers more often than people realize - and these yahoos, thinking they can take one down with a rifle, well - they'd probably get caught firing the rifle long before any of their bullets had the desired effect.

Again, I'm not downplaying their intentions, but I think it's a bit hyperbolic to think the intentions of three 20-somethings represent "right wing fascists and white supremacists." Most guys at that age don't even know what either of those labels even means - EVEN IF they were self-professed as either or both.
Moreover, the number of such imbeciles in our nation is so incredibly small that believing them some sort of "threat to our way of life" - let alone the "#1 threat" is even more of a stretch.

If our "way of life" is truly that fragile that a handful of 20-somethings are its #1 threat - we need to be more concerned about the former rather than the latter.
Nobody claimed they were competent, just evil.
 
Top Bottom