• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Does the Democrat Party now have its very own KGB?

Does the Democrat Party officially have its very own KGB?

  • Based on the facts; definitely No!

    Votes: 51 73.9%

  • Based on the facts; obviously Yes!

    Votes: 17 24.6%

  • I'll let you know after I've dissected the facts!

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Total voters
    69
Empirica said:
The fairy tale says; if the glass slipper fits then it must be Cinderella. 👸 Right? 🧚‍♀️ Right! 🤷‍♀️

So since the KGB slipper obviously fits the FBI, it must be the new American KGB by default!👍
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now back to the business at hand...
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Obtaining a Warrant.
(1) In General. After receiving an affidavit or other information, a magistrate judge—or if authorized by Rule 41(b), a judge of a state court of record—must issue the warrant if there is probable cause to search for and seize a person or property or to install and use a tracking device.

(2) Requesting a Warrant in the Presence of a Judge.
(A) Warrant on an Affidavit. When a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government presents an affidavit in support of a warrant, the judge may require the affiant to appear personally and may examine under oath the affiant and any witness the affiant produces.
(B) Warrant on Sworn Testimony. The judge may wholly or partially dispense with a written affidavit and base a warrant on sworn testimony if doing so is reasonable under the circumstances.
(C) Recording Testimony. Testimony taken in support of a warrant must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device, and the judge must file the transcript or recording with the clerk, along with any affidavit.

(3) Requesting a Warrant by Telephonic or Other Reliable Electronic Means. In accordance with Rule 4.1, a magistrate judge may issue a warrant based on information communicated by telephone or other reliable electronic means.
www.law.cornell.edu

Rule 41. Search and Seizure

www.law.cornell.edu www.law.cornell.edu

Take into consideration the following three very important elements:

(1) The blatant in-your-face actions and inactions of the FBI exposes its obvious political bias and true agenda.

(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.

(3) And this latest FBI warrant served on our former President Trump is an attempt to prevent his GOP candidacy for POTUS in 2024.

How could seven chaotic years of meaningless testimonies & evidence possibly justify this continuous flow of warrantless warrants?

But there is one thing that is an undeniable fact.....Donald Trump absolutely scares the democrats to death!
Click to expand...
None of those three "very important elements" are evident here. These seem to be nothing but baseless assertions
 
Empirica said:
The fairy tale says; if the glass slipper fits then it must be Cinderella. 👸 Right? 🧚‍♀️ Right! 🤷‍♀️

So since the KGB slipper obviously fits the FBI, it must be the new American KGB by default!👍
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now back to the business at hand...
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Obtaining a Warrant.
(1) In General. After receiving an affidavit or other information, a magistrate judge—or if authorized by Rule 41(b), a judge of a state court of record—must issue the warrant if there is probable cause to search for and seize a person or property or to install and use a tracking device.

(2) Requesting a Warrant in the Presence of a Judge.
(A) Warrant on an Affidavit. When a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government presents an affidavit in support of a warrant, the judge may require the affiant to appear personally and may examine under oath the affiant and any witness the affiant produces.
(B) Warrant on Sworn Testimony. The judge may wholly or partially dispense with a written affidavit and base a warrant on sworn testimony if doing so is reasonable under the circumstances.
(C) Recording Testimony. Testimony taken in support of a warrant must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device, and the judge must file the transcript or recording with the clerk, along with any affidavit.

(3) Requesting a Warrant by Telephonic or Other Reliable Electronic Means. In accordance with Rule 4.1, a magistrate judge may issue a warrant based on information communicated by telephone or other reliable electronic means.
www.law.cornell.edu

Rule 41. Search and Seizure

www.law.cornell.edu www.law.cornell.edu

Take into consideration the following three very important elements:

(1) The blatant in-your-face actions and inactions of the FBI exposes its obvious political bias and true agenda.

(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.

(3) And this latest FBI warrant served on our former President Trump is an attempt to prevent his GOP candidacy for POTUS in 2024.

How could seven chaotic years of meaningless testimonies & evidence possibly justify this continuous flow of warrantless warrants?

But there is one thing that is an undeniable fact.....Donald Trump absolutely scares the democrats to death!
Click to expand...
isn't the director of the FBI a Trump appointee.......he is and as such political bias is out the window......the man is doing his job

the 'baseless warrants' have to be proven....apparently they are not baseless .....

and yes this warrant served on Trump is part of a process imo to prevent Trump from running in 2024.....and rightly so......the Constitution does not allow a felony against the government by anyone including the potus......Trump is not being witch hunted.....he is paying the price for his crooked administration.....for his own actions

Trump does not scare anyone.....but what he stands for and you people he represents is very scary.......you guys want a fascist nation and that simply cannot be allowed to happen.......but the truly scary thing is most of you don't even understand fascism
 
TheParser said:
The current period in American history seems familiar to the early 1930s when H*tl*r was preparing to seize control.

I remember seeing photos of Nazi members in the German legislature turning their backs whenever a non-Nazi member went to the rostrum to speak.

Will we see Democrats in the House & Senate turn their backs on Republican speakers?

It seems that all democracies eventually come to an end.

The Democratic Party has decided to disqualify the Honorable Donald J. Trump.

If they succeed, NO Republican should run.

Of course, I hope that the American people will peacefully resist the Democratic dictatorship.

(I expect Canada and Mexico to close their borders to the hordes of American refugees.)
Click to expand...
good Lord man.....that's about the craziest post I have seen.......I assume it is satire
 
LOLOL i love how triggered right wingers are over this. Trump having those documents breaks the law, but they are required by their radical ideology to defend them anyway. And a right winger's favorite way to defend an action is just to attack instead.
 
The flaming lib said:
The entire Dem/lib/progressive establishment is scared shitless over the orange one. He’s stands against everything they believe. View attachment 67405802
Click to expand...
You’re so adorable with your little memes. You should send them to Trump so he has something to read in prison.
 
Taylor said:
Bonehead Biden just can't stop the stupid.
Click to expand...
Hahahahahahahah ya boy Donny got caught breaking the law but you just GOTTA whine about Biden somehow. So you go with the generic insults.

Absolutely pathetic.
 
Empirica said:
The fairy tale says; if the glass slipper fits then it must be Cinderella. 👸 Right? 🧚‍♀️ Right! 🤷‍♀️

So since the KGB slipper obviously fits the FBI, it must be the new American KGB by default!👍
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now back to the business at hand...
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Obtaining a Warrant.
(1) In General. After receiving an affidavit or other information, a magistrate judge—or if authorized by Rule 41(b), a judge of a state court of record—must issue the warrant if there is probable cause to search for and seize a person or property or to install and use a tracking device.

(2) Requesting a Warrant in the Presence of a Judge.
(A) Warrant on an Affidavit. When a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government presents an affidavit in support of a warrant, the judge may require the affiant to appear personally and may examine under oath the affiant and any witness the affiant produces.
(B) Warrant on Sworn Testimony. The judge may wholly or partially dispense with a written affidavit and base a warrant on sworn testimony if doing so is reasonable under the circumstances.
(C) Recording Testimony. Testimony taken in support of a warrant must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device, and the judge must file the transcript or recording with the clerk, along with any affidavit.

(3) Requesting a Warrant by Telephonic or Other Reliable Electronic Means. In accordance with Rule 4.1, a magistrate judge may issue a warrant based on information communicated by telephone or other reliable electronic means.
www.law.cornell.edu

Rule 41. Search and Seizure

www.law.cornell.edu www.law.cornell.edu

Take into consideration the following three very important elements:

(1) The blatant in-your-face actions and inactions of the FBI exposes its obvious political bias and true agenda.

(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.

(3) And this latest FBI warrant served on our former President Trump is an attempt to prevent his GOP candidacy for POTUS in 2024.

How could seven chaotic years of meaningless testimonies & evidence possibly justify this continuous flow of warrantless warrants?

But there is one thing that is an undeniable fact.....Donald Trump absolutely scares the democrats to death!
Click to expand...
why are you trying to run cover for a thief?

do you live in San Francisco?
 
Elmo said:
A private citizen is keeping boxes of sensitive classified documents in his home. He has been asked repeatedly to cooperate and return them to the government. He refused.

Imagine there's a totally nonpartisan law enforcement agency. What specific actions do YOU think such an organization should take to resolve the situation?
Click to expand...
But did Trump have the power to declassify documents while he was in office. Politifact reluctantly admits that he did, even if DT didn't dot all the i's and cross all the t's.

Risch said, "The minute the president speaks about it to someone, he has the ability to declassify anything at any time without any process."

We found broad agreement that a president, using powers granted by the Constitution, is able to declassify essentially anything. However, experts added that Risch’s comment was not entirely on point for the particular situation involving Trump.

In this case, it appears Trump didn’t actually use his declassification power before talking to the Russian officials, and just because Trump’s actions were legal doesn’t necessarily mean they were wise. These caveats add nuance to analyses of what Trump did.

The statement is accurate but needs clarification and additional information, so we rate it Mostly True.
Click to expand...
 
Based on the FACTS definitely NO.

Have a nice day!
 
Phys251 said:
Soon he will live rent-free in prison. :)

And you righties will melt down again. :LOL:
Click to expand...
Not going to happen, but it might be a fun and decent reason to have a party if it did happen.
 
Ouroboros said:
But did Trump have the power to declassify documents while he was in office. Politifact reluctantly admits that he did, even if DT didn't dot all the i's and cross all the t's.
Click to expand...
FFS even if he had the right, he didn't exercise it. We're dealing with highly sensitive classified info, so dotting the i's and crossing the t's is a COMPLETELY NECESSARY STEP. Without that step, it remains classified and therefore illegal for some random private citizen to possess.
 
Empirica said:
The fairy tale says; if the glass slipper fits then it must be Cinderella. 👸 Right? 🧚‍♀️ Right! 🤷‍♀️

So since the KGB slipper obviously fits the FBI, it must be the new American KGB by default!👍
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now back to the business at hand...
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Obtaining a Warrant.
(1) In General. After receiving an affidavit or other information, a magistrate judge—or if authorized by Rule 41(b), a judge of a state court of record—must issue the warrant if there is probable cause to search for and seize a person or property or to install and use a tracking device.

(2) Requesting a Warrant in the Presence of a Judge.
(A) Warrant on an Affidavit. When a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government presents an affidavit in support of a warrant, the judge may require the affiant to appear personally and may examine under oath the affiant and any witness the affiant produces.
(B) Warrant on Sworn Testimony. The judge may wholly or partially dispense with a written affidavit and base a warrant on sworn testimony if doing so is reasonable under the circumstances.
(C) Recording Testimony. Testimony taken in support of a warrant must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device, and the judge must file the transcript or recording with the clerk, along with any affidavit.

(3) Requesting a Warrant by Telephonic or Other Reliable Electronic Means. In accordance with Rule 4.1, a magistrate judge may issue a warrant based on information communicated by telephone or other reliable electronic means.
www.law.cornell.edu

Rule 41. Search and Seizure

www.law.cornell.edu www.law.cornell.edu

Take into consideration the following three very important elements:

(1) The blatant in-your-face actions and inactions of the FBI exposes its obvious political bias and true agenda.

(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.

(3) And this latest FBI warrant served on our former President Trump is an attempt to prevent his GOP candidacy for POTUS in 2024.

How could seven chaotic years of meaningless testimonies & evidence possibly justify this continuous flow of warrantless warrants?

But there is one thing that is an undeniable fact.....Donald Trump absolutely scares the democrats to death!
Click to expand...
The fact that with in ~ 12 hours Hillary had already had Hats/ Merch ready to be sold let's the people with Brains know that they
were in cahoots with the FBI planning an extravaganza Media Blitz!... So all the Sheep can think there's something really going on.
news.yahoo.com

Hillary Clinton promotes 'But Her Emails' merch after FBI search of Trump's Mar-a-Lago

A day after federal agents conducted a search of the former president's home, the 2016 Democratic nominee responded by promoting merchandise emblazoned with what has become the sardonic response to his many scandals.
news.yahoo.com news.yahoo.com

Just like they did when they raided Roger Stone....
 
TheParser said:
The current period in American history seems familiar to the early 1930s when H*tl*r was preparing to seize control.

I remember seeing photos of Nazi members in the German legislature turning their backs whenever a non-Nazi member went to the rostrum to speak.

Will we see Democrats in the House & Senate turn their backs on Republican speakers?
Click to expand...

Republicans literally censure Republicans who aren't considered loyal enough to Dear Leader, so wtf are you talking about? :ROFLMAO:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom